Quantcast
Channel: Tony Greenstein's Blog
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2413

Defend Jackie Walker, Vice Chair of Momentum from the Racists of the ‘Jewish’ Labour Movement

$
0
0

Jackie Walker is pilloried for saying that the Holocaust is the property of all humanity

Jackie Walker speaking at an LRC meeting in Brighton.  Also on the platform was John McDonnell
Another JLM supporter is quite certain that Jackie is not Jewish - why?   because she is Black
 
Just one of many abusive and racist tweets Jackie has received, courtesy of the JLM's campaign - notice how she is a 'pro-Islamist' - like the fascists Zionists are the most extreme Islamaphobes
 I wrote two  blog posts last week, Open Letter to John McDonnell – Don’t Condone the Race Baiters of the Jewish Labour Movement and The Jewish Labour Movement and its Political Lynching of Jackie Walker describing how Jackie Walker, Momentum’s Vice Chair, has come under sustained attack by the supporters of the Israeli state.  What Zionists cannot bear most of all is that Jackie Walker is both Black and Jewish.  Numerous abusive tweets (we only hear about abusive tweets directed at MPs) by people who could not possibly know her have confidently declared that she is not Jewish.  Why?  Because it is an article of faith amongst most Zionists that Black people are not Jewish.
William Fishman, a Jewish historian, tells how the Zionists played no part in Jewish socialism and trade union struggles in the East End - Zionism was a petit bourgeois delusion
In the early 20th century when there was a Jewish labour movement, Zionists were excluded as scabs

These racists are being led by Jeremy Newmark and Mike Katz of the inappropriately named Jewish Labour Movement (until 2004 it was known as Poalei Zion).  I say inappropriate because when there was a Jewish labour movement in this country, it wanted nothing to do with the Zionist movement, which was rightly seen as a scab movement.  The Zionists were, as the enclosed scan from William Fishman’s highly acclaimed East End Radicals shows, held in contempt by a very real Jewish labour movement which, at its peak, consisted of over 30 Jewish unions.  A labour movement which helped destroy Sir Oswald Moseley’s British Union of Fascists at the Battle of Cable Street, a struggle which the Zionists desperately opposed at the time along with their bourgeois cousins in the Board of Deputies of British Jews.

crocodile tears come easy to these Blairite Zionists
The Zionists and the race baiters of the Jewish Labour Movement have never got over the fact that at her investigation Jackie was cleared of anti-Semitism.  This was not surprising given that this indefatiguable fighter against racism and fascism in Thanet, helped lead the Kent anti-racist network in their fight against the National Front in Dover.  You will never see Zionist groups at an anti-fascist mobilisation or doing work with asylum seekers or against state racism.  Jackie made the ‘mistake’ of privately discussing, in a Facebook post with friends, the involvement of Jews in financing the slave trade.  It is a historical fact that at certain times Jews did indeed play a major part in financing the slave trade.  That does not mean and contrary to their allegations, Jackie has never said that it meant, that Jews therefore were the primary financiers of the slave trade.
It is because of these libellous attacks on Jackie that we asked John McDonnell to pull out of the JLM rally against ‘anti-Semitism’ last Sunday, which he did.

Zionist ‘anti-racism’ is purely an establishment affair.  It is a right-wing form of ‘anti-racism’ which pillories the victims of racism and presents the racists in an anti-racist garb.  It is an inversion of reality.  Zionism manages to turn the victims of settler colonialism, the Palestinians, into the racists whereas the settlers are seen as the victims of those whose land they colonise.  In the Zionist fantasy world, the Palestinians attack them, not because the colonists steal their land, water and resources – it is because they are Jewish! 
Jeremy Newmark - Chair of the JLM and accused of lying by an employment tribunal in Fraser v UCU where Newmark tried to argue that supporting a boycott of Israel was anti-Semitic
What is most obscene is the Zionist use of the Holocaust to justify their settler colonial project.  Zionism predated the holocaust, which began in 1941, by some 60 years.  There was no connection between Palestine and the holocaust other than the fact that the Zionist movement sought to use the oppression and desperate situation of the Jews in Germany between 1933 and 1941 for their own advantage.  What was despicable was that even during the Holocaust the Zionists preferred to look the other way.  At no time during the years 1941 to 1945 was there a concerted Zionist campaign to save even a fragment of the Jews in Europe.  The only interest of the Zionist movement was in emigration, selective emigration to Palestine. 
the Zionists have been waging a concerted campaign to expel Jackie Walker
It is a matter of historical record that the Zionist movement agreed a trade deal with Nazi Germany in August 1933, just when the Jewish boycott of Hitler was taking off world wide.  It was agreed to by the Hitler regime precisely because it would destroy the Boycott of Nazi Germany.  The Boycott had had a devastating effect on Germany’s economy.  As Edwin  Black wrote in the ‘Transfer Agreement’ 

’For the entire first half of 1933 exports were down 51%.  ‘That six month loss would have been greater except that the anti-Nazi boycott had not really commenced until late March.’ [p.223]

The Zionists preferred to break the Boycott because they wished to lay their hands on the wealth of German Jewry regardless of the fact that only the Boycott had restrained the hands of the Nazis.  Between 1933 and 1939 60% of capital investment in Jewish Palestine was from Nazi Germany.  The behaviour of the Zionists in Hungary and elsewhere has been well documented by more honest Zionists such as Ben Hecht in Perfidy.  Suffice to say, the allegations of collaboration brought by the survivors of the Hungarian holocaust in Israel resulted in the Kasztner Trial in Israel between 1953 and 1958.  The verdict confirming collaboration by the Zionist leaders in Hungary  caused the fall of the second Labour Zionist government led by Moshe Sharrett in 1955.
faced with the choice between rescuing half of Germany's children in Palestine and all of them in Britain, Ben Gurion openly said that he preferred the former
It is a matter of historical record that the Zionist movement was disinterested in the Holocaust whilst it happened.  I post here 4 pages from ‘The Burning Ground’ the official biography of Ben-Gurion by Shabtai Teveth.
Ben Gurion openly stated that the Holocaust would be used towards the 'building of our country' that was the Zionists main imperative
Ben Gurion and the Jewish Agency Executive (the govt. in waiting) did not put rescuing Jews from the Nazis above Zionist work to build their state in Palestine
Jackie Walker raised the JLM's hackles by questioning the uniqueness of the holocaust.  To the Zionists it is a cardinal principle that the Holocaust is the property of the Jewish people alone. 
Lucy Dawidowicz, a right-wing Zionist historian, in the Holocaust and the Historians argued that subsuming Jewish losses under a universal or ecumenical classification is to effectively justify anti-Semitism. To Elie Wiesel it was a “betrayal of Jewish history”.  [Norman Finkelstein, Holocaust Industry, p.45]    As Israeli journalist and historian Boaz Evron wrote, the real purpose of Zionist Holocaust awareness ‘is not at an understanding of the past, but a manipulation of the future’. 
For daring to raise the idea that mass genocide or holocausts might be the property of all humanity, that Africans, Cambodians, Jews and others have suffered at one time or another equivalent acts of genocide, Jackie Walker has been vilified.  First into the fray was that well-known anti-racist newspaper, the Daily Telegraph.  In a bizarre article Revealed: Jeremy Corbyn ally says Holocaust Memorial Day should not just be about genocide of Jews Jackie was attacked for being ‘insensitive and provocative’ i.e. debating the questions surrounding the holocaust and the lessons it imparts.  Particularly galling was her statement that it would be "wonderful" if Holocaust Memorial Day was not just about the genocide of Jews. 

Although in theory HMD is open to all, in practice it centres around the holocaust of the Jews.  Every other mass act of genocide is left on the periphery.  On this Jackie is absolutely correct.  In Israel school children are taken on trips to Auschwitz, not to learn about the lessons of racism but to reinforce their racism.  Racism has become ‘a basic element in the everyday life of Israeli youth’ according to an article in Ha’aretz.  Israeli Teenagers: Racist and Proud of It.  This racism is as much part of the Labour Zionist tradition as that of Likud. 

Again according to Ha’aretz, which is Israel’s sole liberal daily:   ‘Nearly half of Israel's high school students do not believe that Israeli-Arabs are entitled to the same rights as Jews in Israel’. The same poll revealed that more than half the students would deny Arabs the right to be elected to the Knesset. Poll: Half of Israeli High Schoolers Oppose Equal Rights for Arabs
This is the racism that the JLM should be focussing on.  Instead they invite Israeli racists to the Labour Party conference. 


The Independent reports Momentum vice chair Jackie Walker apologises over 'appalling' Holocaust comments quotes Jackie as saying that if she had caused offence she apologises.  Jackie is and has been under an immense amount of pressure by those whose agenda is defending the United State’s guard dog in the Middle East.  A state which has acted as the sponsor and supporter of every death squad regime in Central and South America. A regime which was the closest friend of Apartheid South Africa.  In reality Jackie has nothing to apologise for.  The Zionists of course take offence when anyone questions their bogus assertions of ‘anti-Semitism’ precisely because they and we know that there is no anti-Semitism crisis in Labour.  It is a great pity that Jeremy Corbyn has bowed to the prevailing wind.  However it won’t do him any good because, as Kipling observed, paying Danegeld merely increases the appetite of the blackmailer and that is what Jeremy Newmark, Katz and the JLM are in the business of - blackmail.

The other ‘crime’ of Jackie Walker was to say that ‘I was looking for information and I still haven’t heard a definition of anti-Semitism that I can work with’ Possibly this is because the Zionist movement have been busy peddling for years the discredited   European Union Monitoring Committee’s Working Definition of Anti-Semitism.  It was a working definition which the Fundamental Rights Agency deleted from their website.   This definition of ‘anti-Semitism’ tried to marry opposition to Israel and comparisons between Nazism and Zionism with anti-Semitism.  The University College Union and the National Union of Students rejected it and even the Zionists finally admitted that the EU had ditched the agreement [Israel lobbyists finally concede that EU has ditched anti-Semitism “definition”].  The JLM however, led by Jeremy Newmark, who was openly accused by an employment tribunal of lying on oath, pretended at its ‘training session’ that the EUMC definition was the standard definition.  That is a lie and he knows it.
According to the Independent ‘Senior members of Momentum are "fuming" at her remarks’.  If this is true then they should take a long and hard look at their own behaviour.  Cowardice rarely pays.  Any sign of weakness from Momentum’s leadership will be capitalised on by the Zionists and the Tom Watsons of this world.  Momentum needs to stand firm and reject the attacks on Jackie Walker.  If Lansman backs down now, we will remove him from the leadership of Momentum when eventually a conference is called.
According to the Independent, The Holocaust Education Trust, founded by the paedophile Blairite Greville Janner, accused Jackie Walker of undermining and belittling “the distinct nature of the tragedy itself”.  This is utter rubbish.  Placing the Holocaust in an anti-racist context rather than exceptionalising and essentialising it, is exactly the opposite of undermining and belittling it.
Exceptionalising it by suggesting that it could only happen to the Jews when holocausts and mass genocide have been the lot of many people is to take the holocaust out of history.  Essentialising it is to divorce the holocaust from the reasons it occurred, in other words it wasn’t fascism, the destruction of the German labour movement, the medieval myths fashioned into modern racism, it was something about the Jews themselves.  The Zionist idea of understanding the Jewish Holocaust is not to understand it.
The HET stated that ‘The deliberate use of term Holocausts – plural – undermines and belittle the distinct nature of the tragedy itself, ignores that genocides are the result of diverse and unique factors, and also deprives the Jewish community of their collective memory.”  This is nonsense.  It is precisely by placing the Jewish holocaust in a  relative and historical context that one can make sense of it.  There are also other questions to ask such as why the holocaust has taken on this importance over 70 years after it occurred when it was barely mentioned in the first 20 years after it occurred.  The answer seems obvious.  As Israel moves further and further to the racist Right, as mobs chanting ‘Death to the Arabs’ become a regular feature of Israel’s political scene (it used to be ‘Death to the Jews’ in Europe) so the Holocaust is the shield to deflect criticism of Zionist racism.  What is obscene is the use of the holocaust in order to justify today’s racism.
Tony Greenstein


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 2413

Trending Articles