This post was originally posted in November 2015 but has since disappeared!
‘In fact the CST has been incredibly helpful to me in my work.’
 |
| Egotist extraordinaire |
 |
| The ego attacks Ali Abunimah |
Indeed this blog was set up to combat the anti-Semitism of Gilad Atzmon, Paul Eisen and Mary Rizzo 8 years ago. That is the meaning of its url – azvsas – anti-Zionism vs anti-Semitism. In 2012 we worked with others in the executive of Palestine Solidarity Campaign, including its Secretary Ben Soffa, to eradicate the present of the holocaust deniers and anti-Semites. This included the expulsion of an open holocaust denier from Brighton, Frances Clarke-Lowes. We worked with Palestinian comrades who understood the dangers of anti-Semitism to the Palestine solidarity movement and shortly after Ali Abunimah, Omar Barghouti and Professors Joseph Massad and Naseer Aruri, plus many others issued a statement GrantingNo Quarter: A Call for the Disavowal of the Racism and Antisemitism of Gilad Atzmon
 |
| Spedding prides himself on passing news to Electronic Intifada! |
‘Anti-Semitism’ is the theme tune of the Zionist movement though. It is an allegation made against every single Palestine solidarity activist. What is the effect? Tony Lerman, the founder of the Institute of Jewish Policy Research, before being witch hunted out of it by Zionist capitalists like Lord Kalms for being a dissident, put it like this:
‘‘The anti-Zionism equals anti-Semitism argument drains the word anti-Semitism of any useful meaning. For it means that to be an anti-Semite, it is sufficient to hold any view ranging from criticism of the policies of the current Israeli government to denial that Israel has a right to exist as a state, without having to subscribe to any of those things which historians have traditionally regarded as making up an anti-Semitic world view: hatred of Jews per se, belief in a worldwide Jewish conspiracy, belief that Jews generated communism and control capitalism, belief that Jews are racially inferior and so on. Moreover, while theoretically allowing that criticism of Israeli government policies is legitimate, in practice it virtually proscribes any such thing.’
If indeed anti-Semitism was prevalent in the Palestine solidarity movement, Spedding would provide us with specific examples. Instead he makes vague allegations in exactly the same manner as Zionist propagandists. It demonstrates not only a general sloppiness, politically and factually, but a political style borne more of personal and political opportunism than any commitment to the cause of Palestine.
It also suggests that Spedding is not even concerned about anti-Semitism and that he has other fish to fry. As I wrote in the Seamy Side of Solidarity
‘Like the boy who cried wolf, the charge of "anti-semitism" has been made so often against critics of Zionism and the Israeli state that people now have difficulty recognising the genuine article.’
In other words, if you are seriously concerned about anti-Semitism, then you should be very careful not to make false allegations of anti-Semitism because it merely immunizes people to the real thing.
When I campaigned to expose the undoubted anti-Semitism of Gilad Atzmon the most frequent comment I got from people is that allegations of anti-Semitism were one more example of a Zionist accusations. People were sick and tired of being accused of ‘anti-Semitism’ so much so that they no longer recognised the real thing. That is why false accusations of anti-Semitism are so dangerous and why incidentally Zionists actually don’t care at all about anti-Semitism. Their concern is the Israeli state and for that they are quite prepared to risk the safety of Diaspora Jewish communities.
My attention was also drawn to a series of Twitter comments by Spedding regarding the Zionist Community Security Trust. They tried to fit up the leader of Israel’s Northern Islamic Leagues, Raed Salah, by providing false information to the Home Office on alleged anti-Semitic comments that Raed Salah had made in Israel. In fact the evidence they supplied consisted of a doctored poem, printed in the Jerusalem Post which had words added to it to make it appear anti-Semitic. Words such as ‘You Jews’. Although the first stage Immigration Tribunal upheld the deportation order of Theresa May, the Upper Tribunal quashed May’s order and Raed Salah was freed. CST which had boasted of supplying the original information kept quiet about Justice Ockleton’s devastating judgment.
In a tweet to Timothy Horgan, Gary Spedding wrote that
I've never had any issues with the CST. In fact the CST has been incredibly helpful to me in my work.
In response to an attempt of the CST to foist the discredited European Union Monitoring Committee Definition of anti-Semitism on Amnesty International, a definition which the Europe Union’s Fundamental Rights Agency has now scrapped from its website, Gary Spedding wrote that ‘The Parliamentary group does excellent work on anti-semitism. If you'd like, just ask’
The Parliamentary Committee on anti-Semitism was led by John Mann MP and the corrupt Dennis MacShane MP. It was a wholly Zionist outfit and MacShane and Mann got their comeuppance at the Fraser v University College Union Employment Tribunal, where an attempt was made to suggest that the Boycott of Israeli Universities was ‘anti-Semitic’ and discriminatory. The Tribunal ruled against the Zionists holding that:
‘We did not derive assistance from the two Members of Parliament who appeared before us. Both gave glib evidence, appearing supremely confident of the rightness of their positions. For Dr MacShane, it seemed that all answers lay in the MacPherson Report (the effect of which he appeared to misunderstand). Mr Mann could manage without even that assistance…. And when it came to anti-Semitism in the context of debate about the Middle East, he announced, “It’s clear to me where the line is …” but unfortunately eschewed the opportunity to locate it for us. Both parliamentarians clearly enjoyed making speeches. Neither seemed at ease with the idea of being required to answer a question not to his liking.’
These two characters were responsible for the ‘excellent work’ of the Parliamentary sub-committee on anti-Semitism!
With friends like these….
Below are the relevant e-mails (hat tip Timothy Horgan) and the continuous correspondence that
Gary Spedding foisted on me.
Gary Spedding @GarySpedding Apr 21
@TimothyHorgan1 @AG_ThorpeApps I've never had any issues with the CST. In fact the CST has been incredibly helpful to me in my work.
Timothy Horgan @TimothyHorgan1 Apr 21@TimothyHorgan1 @AG_ThorpeApps I've never had any issues with the CST. In fact the CST has been incredibly helpful to me in my work.
@GarySpedding Parliamentary Group on anti-semitism endorses dodgy Zionist EUMC definition - Thorpe-Apps motions tried to foist this on AI
0 retweets 0 likes
Reply Retweet
Like View Tweet activity
More
Gary Spedding @GarySpedding Apr 21
@TimothyHorgan1 The Parliamentary group does excellent work on anti-semitism. If you'd like, just ask @AG_ThorpeApps directly his view?
0 retweets 0 likes
Reply Retweet
Like
More
Timothy Horgan @TimothyHorgan1 Apr 21
@GarySpedding @AG_ThorpeApps It lacks credibility after MacShane. Also relies too much on questionable CST.
0 retweets 0 likes
Reply Retweet
Like View Tweet activity
More
Gary Spedding @GarySpedding Apr 21
@TimothyHorgan1 @AG_ThorpeApps I've never had any issues with the CST. In fact the CST has been incredibly helpful to me in my work.
GS=Gary Spedding TG=Tony Greenstein
(GS) This is starting to look a bit like one of those childish games where two kids continually pass the same insult back and forth until one of them gives up.
(TG) I thought you promised not to write anymore?
(GS) For someone as advanced in years as you
(TG) Ageism as well as opportunism and unionism. You do get around!
(GS) My activism is a matter of public record. I don't need to defend such in an email exchange with you.
(TG) So why are you then?
(GS) I'm not trying to prove anything to you. The people that matter - my Palestinian and Israeli colleagues - all know my record and that I work hard each and every day fighting for justice, accountability and peacebuilding.
(TG) Yes I’m sure that most people in the world, bar myself, know of your wonderful record. Do you know the meaning of narcissism?
(GS) You've never come across me because you're part of a fringe that no longer plays any serious role in Palestine solidarity in the UK or elsewhere. As I said, the people who really matter all know who I am and the work I do.
Indeed. The very definition of ‘people who really matter’ is that they know about you.
(GS) It doesn't bother me in the slightest that you do not.
(TG) It would appear that it does though!
(GS) it is not an SNP motion.
(TG) No it’s just signed by 28 SNP members out of 33. Strange that.
(GS) It is not my fault that you choose to remain blind to the anti-semitism that blights our movement.
(TG) I see. Anti-Semitism is now a ‘blight’ on the Palestine solidarity movement. Details? Anti-Semitism is marginal. Mainly because groups like Jews for boycotting Israeli goods and Palestine Solidarity Campaign dealt firmly and effectively with anti-Semitism when it reared its head. Perhaps when we were exorcising Gilad Atzmon, Paul Eisen and his acolytes you were in short trousers telling your granny to suck eggs. See http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/feb/19/greenstein
(GS) The Palestinians certainly aren't ignoring the errors of internationals that damage the just cause of Palestine by spreading conspiracy theories and promoting anti-semitic tropes.
(TG) I see. An attack on internationals now? You certainly seem to be playing a few Zionist tunes. Which internationals might they be? ISM?
(GS) You haven't exposed anything. All you did was make a fool out of yourself and prove beyond any doubt that you couldn't care less about the issue of anti-semitism. That you couldn't care less about the concerns of Palestine solidarity advocates such as myself.
(TG) True, I’m not that much concerned about you. That’s the problem with narcissism – you can never understand why others don’t think of you in the same ways you do. I care about the people I work with, people I know are genuine and often anonymous Palestine solidarity activists, not self-seeking publicists with nothing to say.
(GS) That you don't respect the voices of Palestinians who are concerned about anti-semitism damaging the movement.
(TG) Not true. I have the greatest respect for Ali Abunimah and those who signed the statement calling on the movement to grant no quarter to Gilad Atzmon, who you seem unaware of. I also admire Ali for his previous statement regarding Israel Shamir. I also have great respect for the Electronic Intifada which Ali edits. https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/palestinian-writers-activists-disavow-racism-anti-semitism-gilad-atzmon
(GS) That you don't give a damn about the core principles of Palestine solidarity being anti-racist (including against anti-semitism).
(TG) I suggest you read the last sentence of my article Seamy Side of Solidarity http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2007/feb/19/greenstein It is quite clear: ‘You cannot oppose racism against the Palestinians and turn a blind eye to anti-semitism.’
(GS) It really doesn't matter how many times you repeat the lie; but the motion has nothing to do with Gerald Kaufman - except perhaps to demonstrate that anti-semitic rhetoric such as what he used in the meeting at Parliament is not part of any legitimate Palestine solidarity that we in the Palestine solidarity movement recognise.
I'm proud to have raised the issue of Gerald Kaufman's remarks directly with my colleagues in the Labour Party. This issue needed to be dealt with and now it has been. But the problem of anti-semitism within some of the Palestine solidarity movement still persists and must be challenged at every level.
(TG) So it does have something to do with Gerald Kaufman. I did a search of the Jewish Chronicle’s archives. There were over 50 mentions of ‘Arab money’. Racist? Indeed I found over 30 instances of ‘Jewish money’ before losing patience. So it’s a storm in a teacup, grist to the mill for those whose characterisation of Palestinians far exceeds anything Sir Gerald said.
(GS) Given your words to me I get the feeling that you are deeply upset that nobody in the mainstream Palestine Solidarity movement listens to you any more - I'm not confusing myself with the movement, it is you that seems to think being a founding member gives you some kind of ultimate authority. You aren't.
(TG) You shouldn’t attribute your own fears and feelings to others. Clearly you listened to me as I’ve been deluged with your verbal diarrhoea ever since.
(GS) My position on Northern Ireland is nothing to do with this discussion. I support the principle of consent and believe that it is for the people of Northern Ireland to determine their future either as remaining part of the United Kingdom OR becoming part of a United Ireland in the future. It is their choice on the matter and nobody elses. Only once people have worked on building peace and reconciliation to a point where those people are comfortable enough with each other that they refuse to resort to violence.
(TG) On the contrary there are very close comparisons with Ireland. As the first Military Governor of Jerusalem under the British Mandate said, the Zionist settlement was a ‘little loyal Ulster in a sea of hostile pan Arabism.’ The principle of ‘consent’ means a Unionist veto on a United Ireland. In other words a continuation of British gerrymandering. The decision on Partition is a decision for all Irish people, not just those who see their legacy as lying in the Plantation of Ireland.
(GS) Again, it is the people that matter who have confidence in me and the work I carry forward in order to push for social justice and human rights.
(TG) Me, me, narcicisstic me.
I'm not going to sit here and list all the work I have done in solidarity with Palestine.
(TG) That’s a relief
(GS) Suffice to say though that it certainly exceeds drafting a few Early Day Motions for submission to Parliament. As for BDS - I take my direction from the Palestinians at the core of the BDS movement. Not from an individual like yourself.
(TG) Good. I notice you don’t have much to say about it though. No doubt ‘anti-Semitism’ is a more important topic.
(TG) No I just question the motives about someone who claims to be a Palestine solidarity supporter and who witters on about anti-Semitism knowing nothing about it.
(GS) I'm not on any 'Zionist bandwagon' - all serious Palestine solidarity activists laugh each and every time nobodies such as yourself accuse us of being Zionists.
(TG) I wish I could claim to know what ‘all serious Palestine solidarity activists’ laugh or cry about. But who is the ‘us’? The royal we?
(GS) Lastly, I would advise you to heed the disclaimer that is quite clear in my signature. You do not have permission to publish, disseminate, distribute or copy this email or any attachements found herein.
(TG) Ok then I’ll just have to publish it without your permission!
(GS) Further contact will be considered harassment.
(TG) If you’re so concerned about harassment then you don’t need to reply
(GS) Also stop emailing MPs about this EDM. We are all laughing at you.
(TG) Your concern about MPs is touching. I suspect it wasn’t laughter that led you to contact me.
11th November 20.30
Tony,
This is starting to look a bit like one of those childish games where two kids continually pass the same insult back and forth until one of them gives up.
For someone as advanced in years as you I should have thought playground antics were very much a thing of the past. My activism is a matter of public record. I don't need to defend such in an email exchange with you. I'm not trying to prove anything to you. The people that matter - my Palestinian and Israeli colleagues - all know my record and that I work hard each and every day fighting for justice, accountability and peacebuilding.
You've never come across me because you're part of a fringe that no longer plays any serious role in Palestine solidarity in the UK or elsewhere. As I said, the people who really matter all know who I am and the work I do. It doesn't bother me in the slightest that you do not.
To respond directly about the EDM - it is not an SNP motion. It is a Palestine Solidarity motion that makes clear that anti-semitism has no place in our movement. That criticism of Israel is entirely legitimate. Criticism of Zionism is entirely legitimate. It is not my fault that you choose to remain blind to the anti-semitism that blights our movement. The Palestinians certainly aren't ignoring the errors of internationals that damage the just cause of Palestine by spreading conspiracy theories and promoting anti-semitic tropes. You haven't exposed anything. All you did was make a fool out of yourself and prove beyond any doubt that you couldn't care less about the issue of anti-semitism. That you couldn't care less about the concerns of Palestine solidarity advocates such as myself. That you don't respect the voices of Palestinians who are concerned about anti-semitism damaging the movement. That you don't give a damn about the core principles of Palestine solidarity being anti-racist (including against anti-semitism). By claiming that this is 'Zionist sectarianism' you are simply confirming that people such as yourself are willing to dismiss instances of anti-semitism - and thus be complicit in it. The motion does not attack Jeremy Corbyn over Gerald Kaufman's grotesque statements. The motion was drafted MONTHS ago. I speak to Jeremy Corbyn when I'm in Parliament. I send him my briefings every week. I'm non-party political and work with all those who will promote Palestinian human rights, peacebuilding, conflict transformation and most importantly justice.
It really doesn't matter how many times you repeat the lie; but the motion has nothing to do with Gerald Kaufman - except perhaps to demonstrate that anti-semitic rhetoric such as what he used in the meeting at Parliament is not part of any legitimate Palestine solidarity that we in the Palestine solidarity movement recognise.
I'm proud to have raised the issue of Gerald Kaufman's remarks directly with my colleagues in the Labour Party. This issue needed to be dealt with and now it has been. But the problem of anti-semitism within some of the Palestine solidarity movement still persists and must be challenged at every level.
Given your words to me I get the feeling that you are deeply upset that nobody in the mainstream Palestine Solidarity movement listens to you any more - I'm not confusing myself with the movement, it is you that seems to think being a founding member gives you some kind of ultimate authority. You aren't.
My position on Northern Ireland is nothing to do with this discussion. I support the principle of consent and believe that it is for the people of Northern Ireland to determine their future either as remaining part of the United Kingdom OR becoming part of a United Ireland in the future. It is their choice on the matter and nobody elses. Only once people have worked on building peace and reconciliation to a point where those people are comfortable enough with each other that they refuse to resort to violence.
I'm also not a refugee. Nor am I an 'advisor to the SNP' - I'm an independent cross-party volunteer in the UK, Irish and European parliaments on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Whether you think I'm qualified or not is again of no real consequence. Again, it is the people that matter who have confidence in me and the work I carry forward in order to push for social justice and human rights.
I'm not going to sit here and list all the work I have done in solidarity with Palestine. Suffice to say though that it certainly exceeds drafting a few Early Day Motions for submission to Parliament. As for BDS - I take my direction from the Palestinians at the core of the BDS movement. Not from an individual like yourself.
Again this is clearly about playing the 'better activist' game - the whole thing about your activism surpassing my own? You seem desperate to be validated.
As for your claim that I 'use MPs' or that this in some way is for the 'strengthen' my own career... I study Biology. My future is in the field of nature and the natural world. I don't have a career in the field of Israel-Palestine. There is absolutely no benefit or incentive for me in doing the work that I do except knowing that it furthers the causes of justice, equality and human rights.
I'm not on any 'Zionist bandwagon' - all serious Palestine solidarity activists laugh each and every time nobodies such as yourself accuse us of being Zionists.
Lastly, I would advise you to heed the disclaimer that is quite clear in my signature. You do not have permission to publish, disseminate, distribute or copy this email or any attachements found herein.
Further contact will be considered harassment. Also stop emailing MPs about this EDM. We are all laughing at you.
From: Tony Greenstein <tonygreenstein111@gmail.com>
Sent: 11 November 2015 18:53
To: Gary Spedding
Subject: Re: Anti-semitism and Palestine Solidarity (Early Day Motion 652)
Sent: 11 November 2015 18:53
To: Gary Spedding
Subject: Re: Anti-semitism and Palestine Solidarity (Early Day Motion 652)
Gary,
You said:
(GS) Now we get to the real issue I think. This is yet another case of activist egotism on your part.
(TG) There's certainly no activism on your part, just egotism.
(GS) I've seen it many times before.
Not all of us have your experience of course
(GS) The reality is I don't need a high opinion of myself.
That's just as well. But why do you keep mentioning it then?
(GS) Other people hold these high opinions about me and the work I do.
Strange. I've never come across one such person. You might think, as one of the original founders of national Palestine Solidarity Campaign, a member of Brighton PSC and a co-founder of Jews Against Zionism and Jews for Boycotting Israeli Goods I might, having spoken at dozens of meetings over the years and having met with hundreds of fellow activists, that I would have heard of you. Strange to say I've not once come across you or heard mention of you.
(GS) It's one of the reasons why I don't feel threatened by you in the slightest.
I realise you have difficulty in both reading and comprehending at the same time, but I have no desire or wish to threaten you nor have I. Of course just because you're obviously paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you - just count me out!
(GS) I know enough about your so-called work from these exchanges and also from what you have done over the past week.
You mean calling out an SNP Early Day Motion drafted by you which talked about the 'anti-Semitism' of the Palestine solidarity movement. Yup. I did expose this nasty little bit of Zionist sectarianism, which tried to attack Jeremy Corbyn over the Gerald Kaufmann affair. Indeed you boast of the part you played in it on your FaceBook page.
(GS) Your dismissive attitude reveals that you aren't interested in strengthening Palestine Solidarity in the UK or elsewhere.
You confuse yourself with the movement. Is a refugee from the Unionist Alliance Party in Northern Ireland and an unpaid adviser to the SNP is in a position to judge these things? My record on Palestine solidarity and BDS (something you don't mention) in Britain stands on its own merits. It's just that I don't like to see people use the struggle of the Palestinians to strengthen their own careers.
Having taken part in the disruption of supermarkets, the Jerusalem Quartet, the Israeli Philharmonic Orchestra, the closure of Ahava and Sodastream and been prosecuted and threatened with prosecution for these activities, despite being seriously ill, I think my record of activism surpasses that of yourself, which consists primarily of drafting Early Day Motions for SNP MPs.
I'm surprise that SNP MPs, despite most of them being relatively new, would allow someone like you to use them in this way.
(GS) If you were, then I think you'd not be so nonchalant about the very serious reality of anti-semitism.
As someone who is Jewish, I am in a better position to decide whether anti-Semitism is a 'serious reality' or not. Only the Zionists have an interest in talking up 'anti-Semitism' as part of their campaign to deflect attention away from the Palestinians. It's the old case of 'kill Palestinians, shout 'anti-Semitism'. It doesn't work any longer despite opportunists like you trying to hop on the Zionist bandwagon.
(GS) Your opinion of me matters very little. My performance is judged on how threatened the Israel advocacy groups feel by the work I do and I can tell you that they're terrified. Absolutely terrified.
Yes the sound of them quaking in their shoes is deafening. Scotland has produced some fine comedians - Billy Connolly and Frankie Boyle to name but two. Have you ever thought of changing your profession?
Have you ever heard of the term 'narcissism'?
(GS) It is by no means the only measure.
Anyway, I have nothing further to say to you
That's a relief
(GS) except that you should stop dismissing anti-semitism and start being part of the movement that is making real change for Palestinian rights.
Have you always told your granny how to suck eggs?
PS: Please do assume that everytime you put your foot in it and write such rubbish, that I will reserve the right to put it out on my blog and in public.
Tony Greenstein
Tony,
Now we get to the real issue I think. This is yet another case of activist egotism on your part. I've seen it many times before.
The reality is I don't need a high opinion of myself. Other people hold these high opinions about me and the work I do. It's one of the reasons why I don't feel threatened by you in the slightest.
I know enough about your so-called work from these exchanges and also from what you have done over the past week. Your dismissive attitude reveals that you aren't interested in strengthening Palestine Solidarity in the UK or elsewhere. If you were, then I think you'd not be so nonchalant about the very serious reality of anti-semitism.
Your opinion of me matters very little. My performance is judged on how threatened the Israel advocacy groups feel by the work I do and I can tell you that they're terrified. Absolutely terrified.
It is by no means the only measure.
Anyway, I have nothing further to say to you except that you should stop dismissing anti-semitism and start being part of the movement that is making real change for Palestinian rights.
Gary
you have a high opinion of yourself which isn't matched by your actions.
You should not ascribe motives to others which properly belong to you and you alone
You know nothing of my work for Palestine solidarity over the years. Absolutely nothing. You are just a jumped up student opportunist who has travelled round the houses by all accounts.
I have no wish to damage you. You are doing a good job on your own account.
There was nothing to indicate your correspondence was private nor did you state that it was so. If you had done then I would have treated it so. Otherwise everything is in the public domain - whether it is you or Atzmon (who made similar complaints).
Your arrogance is demonstrated by your belief that one's attitude to you is the measure by which one's contribution to Palestine solidarity should be judged. It isn't. Your work is damaging not helpful.
tony greenstein
Tony,
You did not have my permission to publish correspondence between myself and yourself.
This really needs to stop now. I'm tired of your condescending attitude. I have real work to be getting on with that actually does something for Palestinian rights and justice rather than the petty squabbles that you clearly feed on.
You need to understand that nothing you say damages me. Not one thing. All you have done is damage yourself with your attacks against me.
The breach of my privacy through the publication of private correspondence is not a political dispute. It is a legal one. And I have already sent the relevant letters and documentation to a solicitor who will decide what to do from this point.
Everything you have written is based on your own twisted interpretation of things and the attempt to smear me through defamation of character.
All this experience you claim to have counts for nothing where I'm concerned. It means nothing. It is nothing.
You aren't in this to promote Palestine solidarity. It's evident from your postings (and your interactions with me) that you are in this to serve your own agenda and your own interests. It's deeply insulting to the Palestinian people when so-called 'activists' like yourself come out the woodwork.
I'll continue working at the high standard and level I am so that one day Palestine will be free. I'll continue collaborating with Palestinian and Israeli human rights activists from a wide range of NGOs. I'll also continue fighting anti-Semitism in all its manifestations and building trust with the UK's various Jewish communities.
As I have already said; nothing you have written, nothing you are doing and nothing you have said is going to damage me. Israel advocacy organisations have tried exactly the same thing as you are doing now. It's almost as if you are an Israel advocate yourself. You use the same tactics as they do; lies, false assumptions and misrepresentations.
You have also embarrassed yourself in front of a wide range of individuals and groups. As I said; this really needs to stop now.
Mr. Gary Spedding
Gary,
Having practised in employment tribunals for over a decade and having been a legal advisor for the same time, your solicitor holds out no terrors. I also have experience of the libel courts having helped bring a successful action against The People some years ago as well as successful actions against David Aaronovitch and the Trades Union Congress.
Publishing conversations, private or otherwise, is not defamatory.
You say you do not wish to hear from me further. Fine. I was only responding to your email, just as I only responded to your use of FB's chat facility.
I don't generally advise trying to settle political differences in the law courts but be aware you will find libel a costly game and remember that not only is the truth an absolute defence but fair comment is also a defence following the Reynolds case. I only suggest this so that you don't waste your money.
My political points remain. Assuming you genuinely mean what you say, and I have no way of knowing this, then you need to reconsider your position.
tony greenstein