On the Eve of Holocaust Memorial Day Israel has been Found by the International Court of Justice To Have Been Perpetrating a Genocide
Register in advance
for this webinar here
ICJ interim ruling on
genocide case against Israel - Live
It is a comforting myth, not least to the German State,
the heir to the Nazi murderers, to believe that the State of Israel was gifted
to the Jews in compensation for the Holocaust.
Like all such myths it carries within it the danger that
it will imbue those who claim to inherit the memory of those who died, with the
power to repeat what happened before. And thus it has come to pass that Israel has
been found to have perpetrated genocide in Gaza in the name of the Jewish Holocaust.
It is a myth that Israel was created because of the Holocaust.
If that were true why is there no Roma or Gypsy state? Why have the Gypsies and
Roma not been offered compensation equivalent to Germany’s reparations to Israel?
The Gypsies continue to be hounded and persecuted in Europe.
In fact the colonisation of Palestine by Zionist settlers
began in 1882 not 1945. The Holocaust was, as far as the Zionist leaders were
concerned fortuitous in that it enormously strengthened their project. As Noah
Lucas, a critical Zionist historian wrote in The Modern History of Israel:
‘As the European holocaust erupted,
Ben-Gurion saw it as a decisive opportunity for Zionism... In conditions of
peace,… Zionism could not move the masses of world Jewry. The forces unleashed
by Hitler in all their horror must be harnessed to the advantage of Zionism.
... By the end of 1942… the struggle for a Jewish state became the primary
concern of the movement.’
Even now Germany refuses to compensate Namibia for
the massacre of more than 70,000 Herero and
Nama people between 1904 and 1908, which was the 20th Century's
first genocide.
Namibia: The Price of Genocide | People and Power
It
is no surprise that Namibia’s anger boiled over
when Germany offered to join Israel’s case at the ICJ. It was in Namibia, then
a German colony, that Germany’s extermination program for the Herero and Nama
people became the
template for the Holocaust.
Eugen
Fischer was the Nazi doctor who helped
pioneer eugenics in the Third Reich. As director of the Kaiser Wilhelm
Institute for Anthropology (1927-42) Fischer provided the ‘scientific’ rationale
for the Nazi’s war of extermination.
On Shark Island in SW
Africa Fischer ran medical breeding experiments on the camp’s inmates. Racist
ideas developed in the colony were brought back to German institutions along
with the Africans’ skulls. In 1939, Fischer declared
When a people
wants … to preserve its own nature, it must reject alien racial elements,… The
Jew is such an alien and, therefore, when he wants to insinuate himself, he
must be warded off.
Fischer
conducted
medical experiments on children born from the rape of African women. His
research inspired Adolf Hitler and in the 1930s, Fischer taught his racist
theories to Nazi doctors. One of his students, Joseph Mengele, was
responsible for the medical experiments in the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp.
It is therefore appropriate that the German state, which never de-Nazified, has offered its support to Israel at the ICJ.
In
March 1988 Professor Yehuda Elkana, a child survivor of Auschwitz, wrote an article
in Ha’aretz, The Need to Forget. Elkana,
who later became Rector of the Central European University in Budapest,
before Netanyahu’s friend, Viktor Orban, the anti-Semitic Prime Minister of Hungary,
closed it down wrote of:
a profound existential "Angst" fed by a particular interpretation
of the lessons of the Holocaust and the readiness to believe that the whole world
is against us, and that we are the eternal victim. In this ancient belief,
shared by so many today, I see the tragic and paradoxical victory of Hitler.
Two nations, metaphorically speaking, emerged from the ashes of Auschwitz: a
minority who assert, "this must never happen again," and a frightened
and haunted majority who assert, "this must never happen to us again."
Elkana described how Israel sent children on
repeated visits to Israel’s holocaust propaganda centre, Yad Vashem asking:
What did we want those tender youths to do with the experience? We
declaimed, insensitively and harshly, and without explanation: "Remember!""Zechor!" To what purpose? What is the child supposed to do with
these memories? Many of the pictures of those horrors are apt to be interpreted
as a call to hate.
Israel also sends thousands of schoolchildren to Poland every year to
visit Auschwitz. As Ha’aretz columnist
Gideon Levy observed,
Remembering
the Holocaust is now for nationalists only. There’s no universal conclusion or
moral lesson.
Levy remarked, prophetically:
I have yet to hear a single teenager come back from Auschwitz and say
that we mustn’t abuse others the way we were abused. There has yet to be a
school whose pupils came back from Birkenau straight to the Gaza
border, saw the barbed-wire fence and said, Never again. The message is always
the opposite. Gaza is permitted because of Auschwitz.
Elkana told how Thomas Jefferson wrote that democracy and worship of the
past are incompatible.
Democracy fosters the present and the future. Too much of
"Zechor!" (Remember) and an addiction. to the past undermine the
foundations of democracy.
Elkana’s conclusion caused uproar in Israel:
we must learn to forget! Today I see no more important political and educational
task for the leaders of this nation than to take their stand on the side of
life, to dedicate themselves to creating our future, and not to be preoccupied
from morning to night, with symbols, ceremonies, and lessons of the Holocaust.
They must uproot the domination of that historical "remember!" over
our lives.
If we are going to commemorate the Holocaust every Holocaust
Memorial Day then we have to ask ‘to what purpose?’ If the Holocaust is going to
be used, as Israel uses it, to justify its genocide in Gaza and maybe the West
Bank too, then Elkana is right. It is best forgotten.
We have seen Israeli politicians proclaim
that the breakout from Gaza on October 7 was the greatest massacre of Jews since
the Holocaust. Not only is this factually wrong but it is morally and
politically wrong too.
Israel sees October 7 through the prism of the Holocaust
because it wants to avoid discussing the real reasons of what happened that day.
I leave to one side the question of what actually happened, as opposed to the
myth of organized rapes, beheaded
babies and all the rest.
It is no wonder that when Antonio Gutterez, the UN
General Secretary, said that October 7 did not happen in a vacuum Israel’s leaders
went
berserk, calling for his resignation. Israeli leaders want people to
believe that the events of October 7 happened, not because of Israel’s occupation
of the Gaza Strip for 57 years and its siege of 17 years but because Palestinians
are consumed by hatred of Jews. In other words our old friend, ‘eternal anti-Semitism.’
We are supposed, according to the Zionists, to
ignore the ongoing genocide in Gaza, the murder of 30,000+ people including
15,000 children, the murder of 120 journalists, hundreds of doctors and health
workers, the destruction of hospitals and homes and instead focus solely on the
700 Israeli civilians, the majority of whom appear to have been murdered by Israel
as a result of its Hannibal
Doctrine.
The decision of the ICJ, despite the fact that it
didn’t order a ceasefire, is welcome. Those who, even now, ignore the death
of Palestinians and instead can only remember
October 7 should be treated as the racists and genociders that they are.
On a personal note, I have myself put an end to a 40
year friendship with someone who wrote in a local
right-wing rag that ‘nothing the
Israeli state has done provides justification for the atrocities of that day.’
The whole article concentrated on attacking Hamas comparing it to ISIS as Netanyahu
did.
As the video below from two Israeli hostages show,
Hamas’s treatment of its captives is incomparably better than Israel’s
treatment of Palestinian prisoners, especially given Israel’s carpet bombing of
Gaza.
Hin & Ajam Were 2 Prisoners of Hamas
The
article railed against an anti-Semitic doctor in Durban without mentioning that
the South Africa Jewish community wholeheartedly supported Apartheid. South
Africa and Israel became close
military partners. Those Jews, like Ronnie Kasrils and Joe Slovo, who joined
the ANC and opposed Apartheid were ostracized by this right-wing Zionist Jewish
community.
Tonight
the Socialist Labour
Network and Jewish
Network for Palestine are holding a meeting on Holocaust Memorial Day. Our
message is that Never Again applies to everyone, including the Palestinians
currently fighting to live in Gaza.
We
should also remember the record of the Zionist movement during the Holocaust when
they not merely prioritized the building of a ‘Jewish’ State over the rescue of
Jews from the Holocaust but they actively opposed all rescue attempts where the
destination wasn’t Palestine.
Historian
Christopher Sykes wrote of the 1938 Evian Conference that Roosevelt called to
find a solution to the Jewish refugee problem and the Zionist attitude to it,
that:
From the start they regarded the whole enterprise with hostile indifference...
If the 31 nations had done their duty and shown hospitality to those in dire
need then the pressure on the National Home and the heightened enthusiasm of
Jews with Palestine would both have been relaxed. This was the last thing that the Zionist leaders wished for…. Even
in the more terrible days ahead they made no secret of the fact, even when
talking to Gentiles, that they did not want Jewish settlements outside
Palestine to be successful... The Zionists wanted to do something more for Jews
than merely help them to escape danger…. that such was the basic Zionist idea
is not a matter of opinion but a fact abundantly provable by evidence... [my
emphasis - Crossroads to Israel]
Nor
should we forget the response of David Ben-Gurion to the Kindertransport, a
scheme whereby the British agreed, after Kristallnacht in November
1938, to admit 10,000 unaccompanied Jewish children to England. He was furious
that they weren’t going to Palestine and in a speech to the Israeli Labor Party’s
[Mapai] Central Committee on 9 December 1938, he explained his reasoning:
If I knew that
it would be possible to save all the children in Germany by bringing them over
to England, and only half of them by transporting them to Eretz Yisrael, then I
would opt for the second alternative. For we must weigh not only the life of
these children, but also the history of the People of Israel.
Likewise
Chaim Weizmann, the first President of Israel and then President of the Zionist
Organisation told Malcolm MacDonald, the Colonial Secretary that ‘‘We shall fight you - and when I say fight
I mean fight.’
We
have to reclaim the Nazi Holocaust for everyone, not just for Jews people or
the Israeli state.
Tony
Greenstein