Quantcast
Channel: Tony Greenstein's Blog
Viewing all 2413 articles
Browse latest View live

When Jews are Tortured the Zionist Right Throws Stones and Protests - but it is Silent over the Torture of Palestinians

$
0
0

Elisha Odess, one of the suspected killers of Dawabshe family. Caption: “We only have the Lord Blessed be He. We only fear Him.”

Shorts
The Times of Israelreports that those suspect of the firebombing of the Dawabshe family in the West Bank village of Duma, three of whom died as a result, are being tortured. 

'Israeli detainees held in connection with an investigation into the fatal firebombing of a Palestinian home have alleged torture and abuse at the hands of their interrogators, as officials indicate they will move toward indictments in the case in the coming weeks.

One detainee reportedly alleged that he had tried to slit his wrists in despair over harsh interrogation methods, a claim swiftly denied by the Shin Bet security service.'

Several Jewish terror suspects have been arrested and are being interrogated by the Shin Bet on allegations of being involved with the July 31 firebombing of the Dawabshe family home in the Palestinian village of Duma.’
Two of Dawabsheh murder suspects in court

It is difficult to keep a straight face.  What torture?  The Israeli Police?  Surely not.  Palestinians are regularly tortured and the Zionist right call this 'anti-Semitism' and proudly proclaim that Israel’s security state is the most moral in the world.   Now, because of world pressure and because of internal political pressure too, Shabak (the security police) has been forced to move against those responsible.  Now there are cries of ‘torture’.
Right-wing Jewish extremists and police clash during a demonstration against the arrest of Jewish youth suspected of involvement in an arson attack in the West Bank village of Duma, December 20, 2015. (Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
I have no doubt that these youths have been badly treated and quite likely tortured.  But the hypocrisy of the settlers and the Zionist right beggars belief.  We should oppose the torture of settler youth in the same way as we should oppose the torture of Palestinians or indeed anyone.  But those who support torture of one section of the Palestinians cannot complain when their supporters are also tortured.  

Another Times of Israel article Right-wing activist arrested after attacking cops reported that 

About three hundred demonstrators blocked traffic in the Chords Bridge area, near the main entrance to the capital, and some hurled stones at police officers. Police in turn rushed the violent protesters in a bid to disperse the rally, arresting six activists.

One of the suspects arrested in connection with the Dawabsha murder, December 3, 2015. Under a court-issued gag order, the identities of the suspects cannot be revealed. (Screen capture)
Six police officers were wounded by violence directed at them by a small minority of the protesters, a police statement said.’
Amiram Benoliel, 21, one of key suspects in Dawabsheh arson-murders. His name and that of all the others I’ve published is under Shabak gag order.
Now this is very strange.  The Knesset has passed legislation providing for 3 year minimum prison sentences for stone throwers and up to 20 years imprisonment in certain cases.  In addition the Police and military usually open fire on Palestinian stone throwers, either with rubber bullets or live ammunition.  Yet that didn’t happen here.  On the contrary the Police merely ‘rushed the violent protesters’ in a bid to disperse them and arrested 6 of them.  No mention of prosecuting the stone throwers.  Why?  Because they are Jewish of course.

Shabak Torture Interrogations Fail to Yield Murder Confessions

The Dawabsheh arson murders and the investigation in their aftermath offer a lesson in the abject failure of the Israeli security system in dealing with Jewish terror.  It is a system built, not on the normal standards of policing in the western world in which evidence is gathered, witnesses interviewed, scenes reconstructed; rather, the emphasis is on extracting confessions, often by brute force.  In the case of Palestinians this will often work because the system is entirely stacked against them.  Even if they refuse to confess to a crime for which they aren’t guilty, they know they will go before a judge who will never reject the “evidence” offered by the Shabak and prosecution.  So essentially, they have a choice: either they confess and accept a “deal” (on the State’s terms); or they maintain silence and are convicted on much heavier terms.
Netanel Porkovich, suspected of being an accessory to the Dawabsheh murders
But it’s different with Jewish suspects.  Ironically, Justice is supposed to be blind.  But in Israel it is judges who turn a blind eye to the ravages inflicted on Palestinian prisoners.  But when it comes to Jews, they can see 20-20.  They might disregard claims of torture by the defense if there is a confession.  But without one, they will likely refuse to accept the trumped-up dossiers normally offered in the cases of Palestinian suspects and routinely accepted by judges as confirming guilt.
That doesn’t work with the Jews.  Even the terrorists.  Because they’re Jews, after all.  They have rights, even the bad ones.  So a judge will not accept a manufactured body of evidence in the absence of some other definitive admission or proof of guilt.  The Jewish accused, even minors like some of those in this case, know this.  They know that if they keep their mouths shut they can beat the system.

If Shabak and the Israeli police were a competent force they would muster the investigative skills necessary to prove this case.  But either they don’t have the skills or they refuse to use them.  What have the arson experts done at the scene of the crime?  Where are the police officers interviewing potential witnesses?  I doubt much, if any of this is done in such cases.  I know for a fact that Israeli police never question Palestinian witnesses regarding such crimes.  Another quirk of Israel’s racist legal and policing approach.

That is why, according to news reports and claims by Defense Minister Bogie Yaalon, the State’s case against the four murder suspects is foundering.  Yaalon has, I thought with rather too much of a smirk, said that the State doesn’t have sufficient evidence to prove its case.  This is, on its face, preposterous.  When four terrorists burn a house down and kill three people, there are reams of evidence.  If they can’t solve this case with real evidence and policing techniques they’re either the worst police force in the world, they’re just phoning it in, or they don’t want to solve the case (or all three!).

Yaalon is part of a powerful campaign by the settler lobby seeking to quash the investigation.  This is a political movement which controls many levers of power in Israeli society and reaches into the most senior ministerial offices.  Yaalon is one of them, as are many, if not most other ministers in this government.  They say the crime was heinous.  They say they have no tolerance for it.  But out of the other side of their mouths they do all in their power to sabotage the investigation.

What I find especially odd about all crimes of Jewish terror is that the ideology that underpins it is essentially rejection of the (secular) State.  The attackers in this case have very publicly expressed their hate for both the State and Zionism.  The ideological godfather of the latest iteration of the “Jewish Revolt,” Meir Ettinger (Meir Kahane’s grandson), believes (like many extremist terrorists) that by mounting enough terror attacks against Palestinian targets, it will prove the state to toothless and eventually lead to its downfall.  The fall of the secular state, so this narrative goes, will lead to the founding of a Torah-true theocratic State, a Davidic monarchy.

Amiram Benoliel, 21, one of key suspects in Dawabsheh arson-murders. His name and that of all the others I’ve published is under Shabak gag order.  Shabak released its own statement about their motives:

It is an extremist anti-Zionist ideological group whose purpose to exploit violence to destroy the established order, by means of terror attacks which would advance their goals.

One of the suspects, Amiram Benoliel, explicitly rejected the jurisdiction of the Israeli court according to this Facebook post on the page of the Kahanist Jewish Voice (full Hebrew statement here).  He demanded to be tried by a halachic court (beyt din) knowing full well that settler rabbis would never convict him.  In fact, he noted that he wished to be tried before Rabbi Yisrael Ariel, who was recently quoted as saying it was permissible to kill both Christians and Muslims if they rejected the seven Noahide Laws.  Ariel leads the Temple Institute, seeking to destroy the Noble Sanctuary and replace it with the Jewish Third Temple.

Benoliel’s supporters are quoted as saying on his behalf during one of his earlier 2014 Shabak detentions:

“The only to which we are subject is the law of the Torah.  We are proud of him for paying the price for remaining true to Torah.”

They further claim that secular judges tasked with hearing his case are “criminals” and “disqualified from hearing evidence according to the laws of the Torah.”

In all other societies which are functional, when a terror network attacks the State itself there is a fast and firm response.  The forces of the State unite to attack terror and uproot it.  If they do not, they risk undermining the very basis for the State’s existence.  That is why George Washington reacted so strongly to Shays Rebellion and firmly put down this farmers’ revolt in Pennsylvania at the outset of the American Republic.  It’s also why Ben Gurion commanded Rabin to attack the Alta Lena, which was bringing weapons meant to enable a Lehi militia that would be independent of the Yishuv’s official military forces.  To survive, a State needs to enforce discipline and allegiance.  Those who reject its sovereignty are, or should be, enemies of the State.
The strange case of the settlers is that they are essentially enemies of the State, but the State embraces them anyway.  In effect, and this is the really crazy part, the State turns on itself; eating itself from within.

It will be interesting to watch who wins in this case.  Will the settlers prevail and sabotage justice?  Is there anyone on the other side fighting on behalf of justice?  I have, in fact, queried my usual Israeli sources on this matter and heard silence in return.  Who speaks for the victims?  In Israel when it comes to Palestinian victims, even murdered ones, it appears no one.

The Shabak is playing some role in resisting the settler narrative.  But in this case it may be less because it seeks justice and truth and more because it’s methods of torture are coming under such fierce attack by the supporters of the terrorists.

It’s astonishing for the terror lobby to shrey gevalt about torture.  Since when have they ever raised a finger to defend the most widely tortured group within the Israeli security system: Palestinians? Why should anyone give a s*** for them in this their hour of need?  At least Israeli Jewish human rights NGOs have denounced torture and other forms of abuse both against Jews and Palestinians. 
But the terror lobby hates Palestinians so much they can’t abide speaking even a single syllable on their behalf, even when it would support their own cause in the long run.

So just in case the hasbara brigade intends to raise this as an issue in the comment threads, I pre-empt your argument: show me a member of the Jewish terror lobby who’s ever articulated a 
principled, consistent position on torture.  Then we can talk.

My right-wing readers will also blanch at my use of terms like “criminal lobby” and “terror lobby.”  But take one look at the group defending virtually all Jewish terrorists: Honenu.  Uri Blau, in his masterful investigative series, determined that American Jews sent nearly $250-million over the last five years to support settlements and other illegal and violent acts of insurrection.  Honenu has delivered nearly $40,000 to convicted terrorists like Avi Popper and their families.  Can you imagine a U.S. NGO raising funds to support convicted al Qaeda or white supremacist murderers in U.S. jails and giving the funds directly to the convicted criminals themselves?  What country in its right mind would countenance such behavior?  But Israel does.

As an addendum, I’ve e mailed the State Department press office asking for a comment on the presence of American citizens among the circles of the most rabid settler terrorists.  That includes Israel Keller, who is one of the four suspected Dawabsheh murderers.  I asked also if State would comment on the tax-deduction the U.S. government gives for those $250-million in donations which directly subvert U.S. policy regarding settlements.  The message was sent two days ago. Apparently, they’re not hurrying to reply.

There should, of course, be a tumultuous clamor from the international community and Diaspora Jewish groups against the looming failure of the Dawabsheh prosecution.  They should, as they did when it appeared earlier that Israel wouldn’t even bring charges, demand transparency and accountability.  There should be demands in no uncertain terms that if Israel doesn’t solve the case it will be immediately filed before the International Criminal Court, just as the Mavi Marmara case has been.  That would stuff a sock in the mouth of the criminal lobby otherwise known as settlers. Where are those voices? 

Tzur Israel Bengusi, teenager suspected terror cell member

The Israeli War on Christmas…and Christianity

$
0
0

Lehava's Benny Gopstein praises the Nazis’ mythical figure ‘The Eternal Jew’

Benny Gopstein is the leader of Lehava, a fascist organisation whose ‘charitable wing’ Hemla is part funded by the State of Israel.  It runs a hostel which caters for poor Israeli Jewish women who’ve been ‘rescued’ from relationships with Arab men.  Thanks to Tzipi Hotoveli, the Deputy Foreign Minister, Hemla  was given a grant by the government to continue with their ‘good works’.  This includes funding Gopstein’s own salary.  Israeli Nazi organisation funded by Government 
One of many varied posters for Der ewige Jude
Lehava’s main campaign is against Jewish-Arab relationships (as in Nazi Germany it's only relationships between the women of the master race and the men of the untermenschen which the racists are obsessed with).  In Germany Hitler specifically forbade the legal authorities charging Jewish women, who had relationships with Aryan men, with Rassenschande (racial pollution).  So it is with Lehava.  Jewish men having sex with Arab women is not a matter of concern though according to religious law they should do it out of sight and far away from their Jewish wives!
Gopstein in chains (Yonatan Sindel/Flash 90)
In August Gopstein came out with a call to burn down Christian churches.  Members of Lehava were recently convicted of arson at Jerusalem’s only mixed Arab-Jewish school, Hand in Hand, though unlike Palestinians guilty of arson received derisory sentences of two and two and a half years..  Now Gopstein has called for the expulsion of ‘the vampires’ of Christianity  from Israel ‘before they once again suck our blood.’  Lehava Leader Benny Gopstein Advocates Burning Churches & Mosques 
Poster for the film Der ewige Jude
This is the language of anti-Semitism and in particular feudal Christian anti-Semitism.  Now Zionism’s fruitcakes have adopted the same language.  But there is a marked contrast between the treatment of Arabs and Jews.  Raed Salah, leader of Israel’s now banned Northern Islamic League, has been sentenced to 11 months gaol on what are essentially trumped up charges of incitement to racial hatred. He has denied the interpretation placed on many of his comments and when he was subject to deportation proceedings in Britain, the government lost the case because it had relied on Zionist sources, the Community Security Trust for its evidence.  The evidence had been tampered with and one poem in particular had had words added to it ‘we Jews’ in order to make it appear to be anti-Semitic.

Indeed he was acquitted of racial incitement by the Jerusalem Magistrates Court.  It was only on appeal to the higher colonial court, the Jerusalem District Court, that the acquittal was reversed, thus demonstrating that the conviction was political not evidential in nature.
Leader of the far-right Israeli group Lehava, Benzi Gopstein on August 11, 2015. (Miriam Alster/FLASH90)
With Gopstein there is no dispute.  He has openly supported the burning down of Christian churches and now advocates their expulsion from Israel in another racist tirade. 
Lehava protestors
What is the response of the Israeli authorities to Gopstein’s comments.  Those who are always so eager to imprison any Palestinian who makes any untoward comment or gesture are strangely silent when it comes to Jewish racists.  Nothing, absolutely nothing.   Because Jewish racism is not only condoned but actively supported by the Israeli government and state.  From Netanyahu to members of his Cabinet, racist statements have poured forth.
One of the exhibits from Der ewige JudeSuch are the double standards of the ‘Jewish’ State.
It is no surprise that Gopstein refers to the Eternal Jew.  This is a figure much favoured by anti-Semites.  The eternal wandering Jew punished for deicide is a standard feature of anti-Semitism.  So much so that perhaps the most anti-Semitic of all the Nazi’s films was the Eternal Jew, , Der Ewige Jude.  Gopstein is in good company.

However Gopstein's anti-Christian hatred is not simply confined to the neo-Nazi section of the Israeli right.  It permeates through religious Zionism and the Zionist right.
Nazi propaganda art  the "Wandering Jew"
In Upper Nazareth, built in order to contain Arab Nazareth (but to where many Arab Nazarenes have gone to live because Nazareth is unable to expand because Arab communities in Israel are denied planning permission and its lands have been confiscated anyway) there has been a virulent campaign against the inflow of Arabs.  The city’s chief rabbi, Isaiah Herzl declared that Xmas trees would be “offensive to Jewish eyes”.  The Mayor, Shimon Gapso, declared that '“As long as I hold office, no non-Jewish symbol will be presented in the city.” 

The Israeli War on Christmas…and Christianity

by Richard Silverstein on December 22, 2015  in Mideast Peace

Fox News and other far-right media sites and politicians have railed for years about the “War on Christmas” supposedly waged by atheists, liberals and other enemies of the Judeo-Christian tradition.  But there is a far more virulent enemy of Christmas and Christianity in our midst.  No, you won’t find him in a Muslim country, the demon du jour of Donald Trump and the far-right.
The Eternal Jew exhibition in Vienna
Instead, you will find him in the Holy Land, Israel, the birthplace of Christianity.  He is Bentzi Gopstein, leader of a Jewish fascist group, Lehava.  In his past, he’s been accused of murdering an Arab couple a week after the assassination of his mentor, Meir Kahane.  No charges were ever brought against him for that crime.  Like white supremacists and Kahane himself, Gopstein has adopted fighting Jewish-Arab miscegenation as his political mantra.

Lehava administers a hostel supported with $120,000 in government funding for “wayward women” who’ve supposedly left relationships with Arab men.  In Knesset hearings, Gopstein and his political supporters have cried rivers of tears about impressionable Jewish women being lured into lives of sexual slavery by Arab men who tempt them.  They offer reams of claims about the severity of the problem, but never any firm statistics.  Nor does anyone ever offer a skeptical view on the matter.
In the past year, Gopstein has expanded his attack to include Christianity as well.  All of it.  He called for the banning of Christianity and the burning down of churches and…lo and behold, a week later the Church of Loaves and Fishes was nearly burned to the ground.  Though arrests were made, no one has been charged for the crime, a standard outcome in Israeli police investigations unless massive political pressure is mounted to lay charges and prosecution.  Jewish terror even co-opts the security apparatus.

This week, just in time for Christmas, Gopstein let loose his latest barrage against the Church.  It’s a memorable screed called Defeating the Vampire, combining overwrought rhetoric with a largely-fictional account of Jewish history:

In recent days, I’ve walked through this land [of Israel] feeling a sense of real disquiet.  I’m not talking about the lack of personal security that derives from a government that is impotent against the Arab enemy…but rather a lack of spiritual security, a destruction of the fortress, a disintegration of the Jewish people’s line of defense against our most deadly enemy of the past hundreds of years: the Church.

He proceeds to outline the ways in which Christianity has allegedly attempted to exterminate the Jewish people:

Against this [the Church’s] unimaginable power stood the Jewish people like a poor sheep surrounded by seventy wolves; like easy prey before all those bloodthirsty animals.  The history of the Jews of Europe…is written in the blood of millions–from the cruel Crusades in which entire [Jewish] communities were wiped out, to pogroms throughout the continent [sic], to countless blood libels, mass expulsions from England, France, Spain and Portugal–all of them were only stations along a cruel journey which our people suffered in Christian Europe.  A journey which reached its end in the smokestacks of Auschwitz, a moment over which the Vatican rubbed its hands with glee [sic].

Despite all this, the Jewish people survived…The Eternal Jew stood tall.  And when the ashes of Auschwitz piled high and the blood soaked into the fetid soil of Europe–when the the desecration of God’s name [the extermination] had reached its peak…God could no longer stand it and raised up out of the smoking embers the State of Israel–a most resounding slap in the face the Church had ever endured.

What was the secret of the Eternal Jew enabling him to survive all these horrors of the Church [sic]? 
Without doubt, it was the burning faith in the justness of our path, the deep loathing of Christianity which every Jewish baby sucks from his mother’s milk…The children of those Jews who were burned like sacrificial sheep, founded the State of Israel, whose very being negated the Church.

…Because we maintain one of the strongest armies in the world the Church has no chance of destroying our bodies…But they place their last hope in the blood-sucking vampire: the missionaries.  If they cannot kill Jews, they can still try to convert them…Stores devoted to selling evangelical literature offer their wares to all on Jerusalem’s Jaffa Road.  Entire settlements are crawling with missionaries.  Many businesses are run by them and serve the evangelicals, in many cases camouflaging their intent and without the knowledge of  their [Jewish] employees.

That same disgust Jews felt toward Christianity, which was the only thing which saved us during our dark days in Europe, that same disgust has faded in the midst of the good life of the era of democracy.  The Christian is no longer perceived as a threatening vampire, but rather as a nice tourist, friendly and a partner in the prevailing western culture we both share.

…In a few days, this cursed religion will celebrate Christmas throughout this land.  To our sorrow we can feel this everywhere.  You see fir trees in stores.  On billboards, you can see flyers inviting the wider public to study about Christianity–right in the heart of Jerusalem.

…How could even the Orthodox and Haredi communities not have raised their voices against this?  Could they too have lost the basic Jewish instinct which was the inheritance of our people for hundreds of years?  Have they too become trapped in the net of democracy, free speech and the politically-correct brotherhood of man?

Christmas has no place in this our holy land.  Evangelicals must not gain a footing here.  Expel the vampires from our land before they once again suck our blood.  We’ve already fed them enough.

For those of you who heard echoes of Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda in Gopstein’s tropes, you heard well.  The notion of the Eternal Jew is of course directly appropriated from the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.  But the most striking phrase was the notion that Christians are blood sucker-vampires.  This is precisely the complaint that echoed in the pages of Der Shtumer: the Jews as leeches sucking the vitality from Europe.  In the case of the Nazis, they were more obsessed with money and high finance, claiming Jews controlled world capital.  Gopstein sees Christians sucking the blood from the millions of Jews murdered, supposedly by direct command of the Church.

Of course, much of his argument is false and fabricated.  I’ve added [sic] after the ones that are the most farcical.

There will be those who argue that Gopstein is an outlier.  He has nothing to do with the real Israel.  Everyone sees him as a madman, etc., etc.  But that is patently false.

Not only is Gopstein an accused murderer, his followers burned down a Jewish-Arab school in Jerusalem.  Other disciples (either direct or indirect) burned the Church of Loaves and Fishes to the ground only a week after he issued a call to undertake such acts.  These are not the acts of the sort of lone gunmen who’ve perpetrated acts of terror lately in the U.S.  This is a powerful leader with a charismatic message that resonates deeply with tens or hundreds of thousands of Israelis.  It is a message the Israeli political and security echelons have no interest in combatting.  Despite calls from the Pope himself and Israeli human rights NGOs for his arrest, he remains free.

It’s also ironic that Israel’s increasingly authoritarian government considers legislative proposals that would force NGOs receiving foreign funding from wearing a sort of “Jewish star” like ones forced on us by the Nazis, whenever they entered the Knesset.  The ironic truth is that rightist NGOs like Lehava, Honenu, Im Tirzu, NGO Monitor, and many others, probably receive far more foreign funding than left-wing NGOs.  The major difference is that the latter receive donations from governments and large foundations, while the rightists receive mostly individual gifts.  You may be certain that if these bills pass you will not see Ronen Shoval (Im Tirzu) or Gerald Steinberg (NGO Monitor) shuffling through the halls of the Knesset with any scarlet letter on their chests.  That fate will be reserved for B’Tselem, Peace Now, New Israel Fund, and their like.

It is truly extraordinary that foreign funders embrace the hate spewed by Gopstein.  He’s very cagey about where his funding comes from.  One source we know for sure is the Israeli government itself.  Its social welfare ministry funds projects sponsored by an NGO called Hemla.  One of them is the hostel for “wayward girls” mentioned above.  Gopstein is the public affairs representative for Hemla and earns a salary from it.

He’s told the media that individual donors are directed to give through the Fund for Saving the Jewish People (FSJP).  One of these is the Falic family based in Hollywood, FL.  This extended family owns Duty Free America, a company which owns duty-free shops around the world.
A Falic-affiliated fund donated $60,000 to FSJP.  They donated more than half the funds that Bibi Netanyahu raised for his campaign in the last Likud primaries.  They also donate millions to a raft of mostly GOP pro-Israel candidates.

As you can see, the Falics are not outliers.  They find the doors of power open in Tel Aviv and Washington DC.  They’ve also endowed Bentzi Gopstein with a seal of approval through their giving to his cause.  Instead of six moves of separation from Gopstein to Netanyahu, there is now only one.  He is close to the beating heart of Israeli political power.

The Falics offered this deceptive defense of their giving to journalist, Uri Blau:

I am committed to giving tzedakah to causes which I care about deeply, such as the well-being and continuity of the Jewish people and the State of Israel. I believe that it is important for Jews to be connected to our roots, our history and our homeland, and to take care of one another.

I believe in diversity, co-existence and integration, as opposed to “anti-assimilation,” but I recognize that this can occur only when each person holds strongly to his or her own ideals, ideologies, religion and convictions. As Tevye succinctly put it in Fiddler on the Roof, “As the Good Book says, ‘Each shall seek his own kind.’ In other words, a bird may love a fish, but where would they build a home together?” In summary, staying true to one’s beliefs can not only give meaning to one’s own life, but can influence the conscience of others to make more sound choices and better judgments, including living together in peace and harmony.

Though it’s touching to see Mr. Falic quote the words of Fiddler on the Roof, I note he’s compared Israeli Jews to birds of prey and Palestinians to fish, their prey.  That does seem just about right, though I’m certain the speaker didn’t catch the irony.  And how Palestinians are supposed to understand from this rhetoric or from Gopstein’s Nazi-like speeches that their “consciences should make better judgements…and live together [with Jews] in peace and harmony” is beyond me.

I recently posted about Donald Trump’s increasingly xenophobic and Islamophobic rhetoric and the tropes it shares with fascist themes.  The call for closing our doors to Muslims, even those who are citizens, is extraordinary.  Even more extraordinary is that such rampant racism gains him supporters, rather than destroying his campaign for the GOP presidential nomination.

Though it appears in the latest polls that even Bernie Sanders could beat Trump in a one-on-one matchup, and many Democrats relish the prospect of running against him–we should recognize Trump as a watershed candidate.  Before him, those whose campaigns were largely based on themes of hate and racism were thoroughly rejected even in their party nomination contest, let alone the general election.  George Wallace, while popular, was largely a fringe candidate.  Barry Goldwater was trounced by Lyndon Johnson.

Trump is a different animal.  He exudes hate, yet his supporters feed off it.  It only makes him stronger.  The rest of the country waits for a day of reckoning which never comes.  His comeuppance never comes.  Instead he glides through the campaign season with the cocky air of Rocky, a heavyweight boxing champ.  Nothing can touch him.
Bentzi Gopstein’s call for ethnic cleansing of Christians and Palestinians from Israel mirror those of Trump here in America.  Israel itself is lurching farther and farther toward fascism and outright religious hatred, if not war.  Israeli extremists like him thrive on this confrontation.  They know the more Jews and Arabs die the closer they are to that final battle between the forces of Light and Dark, between demons (Muslims) and angels (Jews).  They know in their hearts that the Jews will win.  That they will vanquish their enemies and trample them underfoot.  That is the day devoutly and fervently awaited.

Gopstein and Trump represent two poles which attract.  They offer the same solutions (though Trump offers them with considerably more salesmanship and panache).  The outcomes of their winning their contests will be similar for America and Israel: a disaster of monumental proportions.

I have enough faith in America that it will not make this choice.  About Israel, I have far less faith and hope.  It is embracing Gopstein’s vision with a frightful passion.  Whatever ideas of his are not yetmainstream, they will be in a month or a year.  This is the same path followed by his rebbe, Meir Kahane.  In the 1970s they thought him a ranting maniac.  Now the maniac’s ideas trip lightly off the tongues of Israeli cabinet ministers and generals.  Fascism no longer lurks in Israel’s  shadows.  It preens and prances through the halls of power.


Religious rights group calls on police and attorney general to investigate Lehava leader Bentzi Gopstein for incitement to violence in recent op-ed
By Times of Israel staff December 22, 2015, 4:52 am 71

A religious rights organization on Monday called on the police to investigate the head of an extremist anti-assimilation group after he published an op-ed branding Christians “blood-sucking vampires” and calling for them to be expelled from the country.

Bentzi Gopstein, leader of the Lehava organization, penned an article published on the ultra-Orthodox Kooker website last week decrying the “lack of spiritual security” he’s felt in Jerusalem of late because of “our deadly centuries-old enemy — the Christian church.”

Last month, a dozen Lehava protesters headed by Gopstein demonstrated outside a Christmas event at Jerusalem’s YMCA, decrying what they termed the “murder” of Jewish souls.

Shouting, “You murdered us in exile,” and condemning European blood libels and historical persecution of the Jews, the small group waved Israeli flags and sang Hanukkah songs outside the venue, with some signs urging all the “impure” Christians to leave the Holy Land.
A Lehava protester carries a sign reading, ‘Get out, unclean ones,’ at a protest decrying a YMCA Christmas bazaar in Jerusalem on Sunday, November 29, 2015 (Times of Israel)

In his Kooker article published December 17 in Hebrew, Gopstein called the establishment of the State of Israel in the mid-20th century “the most ringing slap in the face the church ever received” after centuries of failed attempts to eliminate the Jews. Since violent methods failed, he writes in his diatribe, “it was decided to invest billions of dollars over the years in order to gain a foothold in the Holy Land and disseminate spiritual poison” through missionary work.
“The Christian is no longer considered a threatening vampire, rather a pleasant, friendly tourist and partner in the Western culture that dominates our lives,” he said, blaming the Israeli education system for not instilling enough Jewish education in students. “The vampires can send a message of thanks to the government of Israel for making their work much easier.”

He called on all willing Jews to raise a cry “and fight the devious phenomenon,” referring to Christianity as “that accursed religion.”
“Christmas has no place in the Holy Land,” he concluded. “Missionary work must not be given a foothold. Let’s throw the vampires out of our land before they drink our blood again.”

Approximately 160,000 Israeli citizens, or 2 percent of the population, is Christian, and a considerable number of Israel’s foreign tourists are adherents to the faith as well.

In response to Gopstein’s remarks, the Israel Religious Action Center called on Israeli legal authorities to launch a criminal investigation into what it deemed to be the Lehava leader’s incitement to violence against another religious group.

“Bentzi Gopstein is capable of doing anything in order to incite against anyone not like him — Arab Muslims, Christians and others, while using blunt language and calling to violence,” Orly Erez-Likhovski said in a statement posted on the group’s Facebook page.

“Unfortunately, against this blatant incitement, accompanied by unruly violence, there’s deafening silence by law enforcement,” she said, calling on Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein to put Lehava leaders and others who incite to violence in the dock.

Lehava was established as an organization aiming to prevent marriage between Jews and Arabs, which is prohibited according to religious Jewish law. The group has become identified with the extreme Jewish right and its members have been seen patrolling downtown Jerusalem on some evenings, looking, they claim, for mixed couples.

Their vigilante patrols have often degenerated into scuffles, and there were several instances over the past year where members of the organization have beaten Arabs. Most of the organization’s members are teens.

Some Israeli politicians have been calling on the government to outlaw the group, whose members have been implicated in several hate crimes.


The "Eternal Jew" or the "Wandering Jew"
The concept of the "Wandering Jew" is far older than National Socialism. It derives from a literary and popular legend, about a Jew who mocked or mistreated Jesus while he was on his way to the cross and who was condemned therefore to a life of wandering on earth until Judgment Day.

The story of this wanderer was first recorded in the chronicles of Roger of Wendover and Matthew of Paris during the thirteenth century. The exact nature of the wanderer's indiscretion varies in different versions of the tale, as do aspects of his character, some of the more common themes being the doom of the "Wandering Jew" to travel the world forever, forsaken by all unfortunate enough to encounter him.

Nazi Propaganda saw in this proof that the Jews have been justifiably persecuted by all racers over the millenium.
The Eternal Jew exhibition first opened in the Library of the German Museum in Munich on November 8, 1937, and ended on January 31, 1938. Billed as a degenerate-art exhibition, it was the largest prewar anti-Semitic exhibit thus far produced by the Nazi's. The exhibit featured photographs pointing out the typically "Jewish" features of political figures, such as Leon Trotsky, and international film star Charlie Chaplin.

The displays emphasized supposed attempts by Jews to bolshevize Germany, It did this by revealing an 'eastern' Jew - wearing a kaftan, and holding gold coins in one hand and a whip in the other. Under his arm is a map of the world, with the imprint of the hammer and sickle. The exhibition attracted 412,300 visitors, over 5,000 per day.

The exhibition moved to Vienna for August 2 through October 23, 1938, and then to Berlin from November 12, 1938 through January 31, 1939. Police reports stated there was a direct correlation rise in anti-Semitic feelings, and in some cases violence against the Jewish community in each city the exhibition was held.
The film Der ewige Jude opened on November 29th, 1940 throughout the German Reich. Each city where the film played had it's own posters. In the Altenkirchen district of Betzdorf, the film was described as a "documentary film about world Jewry". "It is unique because it is no fantasy, but undiluted reality."

The Nazi goal of Der ewige Jude is to be the first film to portray a fully exposed picture of world Jewry, and to be a "valuable tool in the struggle to break the power of the Jews over the Aryan race."

The consistent theme throughout the film of the Jew as parasite in an otherwise healthy host, is found throughout the film in several forms, each of them designed to reveal to Germans the "true" Jew underneath the veneer of European culture that concealed the Jewish parasite.

Jews are introduced as a foreign, swarthy, hook-nosed, untidily bearded, sullen presence that clogs the teeming streets of middle Europe. They haggle, squabble over food at the table, hoard with wealth, conceal it from tax collectors, and grow sleek and fat at the expense of good Germans. Their religion and culture are seen as cabalistic sources of secret powers.

In one famous scene, swarms of rats scurry through cellars and sewers, the shots are intercut with images of Jews emigrating from Palestine to to all corners of the world. The overlaid text conveyed the message:

 "Where rats turn up, they spread diseases and carry extermination into the land. They are cunning, cowardly and cruel, they travel in large packs, exactly the way the Jews infect the races of the world."

Artistically, the film is a "black masterpiece" of the cinematic conventions of 1940; a German version of The March of Time style that included animated maps, falsely labeled stock footage, segments of feature films borrowed to make some ideological point, stills, decoupages of evocative book jackets and headlines, and an omniscient voice-over narration.

The film was directed by Fritz Hippler, the Director of the Film Department of the ministry subordinate to only Joseph Goebbels, for all films produced by the Reich ministry. Born in Berlin in 1909, Hippler studied at Berlin and Heidelberg universities, completing a thesis on Marx, Mill and Lagarde for which he was awarded a doctorate of philosophy.

As a student he was already enthusiastic about the Nazis, joining their various organizations as early as 1926. They promised to create work for all, end corruption and restore Germany's place in the world, this appealed to Hippler who managed to obtain a position working on newsreels. The quality of  of his work did not go un-noticed and several reels  impressed Goebbels who later promoted him to Director in 1939.
Fritz Hippler
Throughout the making of Der ewige Jude, Hippler kept in daily contact with Goebbels, he returned with final footage to Berlin on October 16, 1940. The rushes were developed the same day and shown to Goebbels during the evening. The pictures of half-an-hour with ritual slaughtering, deliberately staged as cruelty to animals, shocked Goebbels who wrote in his diary the next morning:

"Dieses Judentum muss vernichtet werden." (This Jewry must be annihilated).

After having shown these rushes at the Führer’s dinner-table on October 28, 1940 - where everybody according to his diary were deeply disturbed, Goebbels went to Lodz to see for himself on October 31. He wrote in his diary, that the Jewish Question was more a task for the surgeon than a humanitarian one.

The importance of Der ewige Jude lies not in its technique but in its brutal service to the cause of Nazi racism. Hippler's Der ewige Jude,  would "fill the spectator with a feeling of deep-seated gratification for belonging to a people whose leader has absolutely solved the Jewish problem." It is believed that films such as Der ewige Jude helped prepare the German people to accept the eventual policy of genocide inflicted upon Jews.

Pamphlet written by Joseph Goebbels distributed prior to the start of the film,
outlining we are expected to see and think in the film

The film begins with an impressive expedition through the Jewish ghettoes in Poland. We are shown Jewish living quarters, which in our view cannot be called houses. In these dirty rooms lives and prays a race, which earns its living not by work but by haggling and swindling. From the little urchin to the old man, they stand in the streets, trading and bargaining.

Using trick photography, we are shown how the Jewish racial mixture in Asia Minor developed and flooded the entire world. We see a parallel to this in the itinerant routes of rats, which are the parasites and bacillus-carriers among animals, just as the Jews occupy the same position among mankind.

The Jew has always known how to assimilate his external appearance to that of his host. Contrasted are the same Jewish types, first the Eastern Jew with his kaftans', beard, and sideburns, and then the clean-shaven, Western European Jew. This strikingly demonstrates how he has deceived the Aryan people. Under this mask he increased his influence more and more in Aryan nations and climbed to higher-ranking positions. But he could not change his inner being.
 
After the banishment of the Jews from Europe was lifted, following the age of Enlightenment, the Jew succeeded within the course of several decades in dominating the world economy, before the various host nations realized - and this despite the fact that they made up only 1 per cent of the world population. An excerpt from an American film about the Rothschild's, made by Jews, reveals to us the cunning foundations of their banking empire.

Then we see how Jews, working for their international finance, drive the German people into the November Revolution. They then shed their anonymity and step out openly on to the stage of political and cultural life. Thus the men who were responsible for the disgraceful debasement of the German people are paraded before us. Incontestable examples are shown of how they robbed the country and the people of immense sums.

As well as gaining financial supremacy they were able to dominate cultural life. The repulsive pictures of so-called Jewish "art" reveal the complete decline of cultural life at that time.  Using original sequences from contemporary films, the degrading and destructive tendency of Jewish power is exposed. For hundreds of years German artists have glorified figures from the Old Testament, knowing full well the real face of Jewry.

How the Jew actually looks like is shown in scenes shot by Jews themselves in a "culture film" of a Purim festival, which is still celebrated today to commemorate the slaughter of 75,000 anti-Semitic Persians, and the doctrine with which future Rabbis in Jewish schools are educated to be political pedagogues. We look into a Jewish 'Talmud' class and experience the oriental tone of the ceremony in a Jewish synagogue, where Jews conduct business deals among themselves during the holy services.

However, the cruel face of Judaism is most brutally displayed in the final scenes, in which original shots of a kosher butchering are revealed. These film documents of the inhuman slaughter of cattle and sheep without anesthesia provide conclusive evidence of a brutality which is simply inconceivable to all Aryan people. In shining contrast, the film closes with pictures of German people and German order which fill the viewer with a feeling of deep gratification for belonging to a race whose Führer is fundamentally solving the Jewish problem.

Two different versions of the film were made, the original version, and a toned down one without the gory scenes of ritual slaughtering. In Berlin the film opened simultaneously in sixty six theaters with the two versions shown at different times of the day.

One review by the Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung stated:

"Only when the film ends, can the viewer breathe again, from the darkest recess does he come back to the light again."

Despite such press reviews, the commercial success of Der ewige Jude paled in comparison to other anti-Semitic films such as Jud Süss. SD reports from many regions in Germany and Austria were consistent: "The horror scenes disgusted viewers and the documentary aspect was considered nerve racking."

Despite the commercial failure of the film, images were replicated onto posters and publications throughout the Reich and occupied Europe. The goal of eliciting fear, disgust and hatred, toward the Eternal Jews was summed up by one critic:

"One has a deep sense of salvation after seeing this film. We have broken their power over us. We are the initiators of the fight against world Jewry, which now directs its hate, its brutal greed and destructive will toward us. We must win this battle for ourselves, for Europe, for the world."

Hippler was captured by the British in 1944. He escaped prosecution as a criminal when Allied tribunals failed to convict other filmmakers, such as Veit Harlan,(Jud Suss).  After a process of "de-Nazification" he served the American Army as a translator. In later life, he earned his living as a travel agent.

Letters & Articles 2015 - A Year of Surprises

$
0
0

2015 - When the Fightback Began

2015 has been a very significant year for me.  It involved both fighting for my own life as well as the lives of others.  In September I had a liver transplant, which has so far gone well, having been successfully cured of Hepatitis C with a new generation of non-interferon drugs.

This was the subject of my first letter to the Guardian.  I was fortunate to have a wonderful consultant and excellent care from the Sussex County Hospital in Brighton who got me onto a government funded programme for the sickest 500 hepatitis patients in Britain.  The drug, Sofusbuvir in conjunction with Ledaspavir and Ribavirin knocked out the Hep. C completely.

My letter was about the fact that Sofusbuvir, much of the research for which had been undertaken at Cardiff University, before Gilead Sciences took it to completion was costing $1,000 a pill, i.e. $90,000 for a three month course whereas it costs $1 to make.  India refused it a patent forcing Gilead to agree to the production of a cheaper generic drug.  Britain under Cameron of course took no such step.  The pricing of Sofusbuvir out of all proportion to its actual cost is killing people.  At this very moment Mummia Abu Jamal, the former Black Panther journalist who was framed in Pennsylvania for killing a cop, by a racist judge and an all-white jury, has hepatitis C and the US prison service is refusing to pay for his treatment and thousands of other prisoners who have hepatitis.

The key political fight this year has been against what Bob Dylan once called the Masters of War.  The liars and Benns who argued for yet another bombing campaign, this time in Syria, as if all they had erased from their memory what had happened in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya.

Of course the West was involved in a struggle between good and evil in Syria, against Isis, just as it had done against Saddam Hussein.  No matter that the good fight was being fought with Turkey, Isis’s main partner oil trading partner and rear supply base.  A war fought with Saudi Arabia which at this very moment is aiding Isis and Al Qaeda in Yemen, to say nothing of al-Nusra and ahrar al-Sham in Syria.  Such are the hypocrisies of the West.  But to Hilary Benn it is an ‘anti-fascist’ fight!
I am therefore posting both some of the letters that I had printed throughout the year as well as articles in various papers.  I have contributed a weekly Comment piece to my local paper, the Brighton Argus.

Over the summer the British Labour Party elected Jeremy Corbyn, who was initially given odds of 100-1 against, as leader of the Labour Party.  The Right has since done its best to undermine him and unfortunately Corbyn and more especially John MacDonald have refused to launch a significant fightback.  This is the subject of an article I wrote for Weekly Worker.

I am therefore copying underneath the articles and letters which I have written and that have appeared in the press this  year.


Tony Greenstein 

































Neo-Nazi Settler Wedding Guests Celebrate the Murder of Dead Baby Ali Dawabshe by Stabbing His Picture

$
0
0

The Chickens Come Home to Roost for the Zionist State


Following the release of a video clip, almost certainly leaked by Israel’s Shin Bet Internal Security Police, showing wedding guests at a far-right settler wedding party celebrating the firebombing and murder of 3 members of the Dawabshe family (the sole survivor 4 year old Ahmed is still in hospital) including the stabbing of a picture of the dead baby Ali, there has been an orgy of hypocrisy by Zionist  politicians.
 

Leader of the far-right Jewish Home Party Naftali Bennett has been outspoken in his condemnation of the wedding party.  This is the man who has previously taken pleasure in killing Arabs.
Screenshot of a video showing extremist Israeli Jewish wedding-goers celebrating the killings of the Dawabsha family. (screen capture: Channel 10)
At a Cabinet meeting he had an exchange with National Security Adviser Ya’akov Amidror about a prisoner release.  Bennett had a simple solution:

Bennett: “If you catch terrorists, you have to simply kill them.”
Amidror: “Listen, that’s not legal.”
Bennett: “I’ve killed lots of Arabs in my life – and there’s no problem with that.”

Education Minister Bennett waxed lyrical.  He ‘doubled down on his criticism of figures in the religious Zionist community for their condemnation of the Shin Bet, calling them hypocrites.’  

The even further right MK Bezalel ‘Beelzeebub’ Smotrich spoke of an evil price tag ideology,” days after he had criticised those who call settler attacks against Palestinians terrorist.

Even Uri Ariel a far-right supporter of transfer had the audacity to say that “The clip published by Channel 10 news this evening is shocking and one cannot allow the activity of radical groups fueled by hate,”  This is the same Uri Ariel who has previously condemned those who called the neo-Nazi "hill top youth""terrorists" and who had been responsible for the invasion by settler thugs of Al Aqsa Mosque.  Such is his devotion to the settler movement that in January 2012, Ariel admitted to giving IDF troop movement information to such militants in order to facilitate disruption of army activities.  

The hypocritical Zionist ‘left’ has waxed lyrical in its condemnation.  Isaac Herzog, leader of the Labour Party, termed the wedding guests “maniacs.”.  One wonders who armed these maniacs and allowed them to operate unhindered in the settlements.  Tzipi Livni,  the former Foreign Minister railed that “this is the group that wants to destroy the Jewish Israel, to destroy this state from within, to destroy the government from within and sow hate.”

This couldn’t be the same Tzipi Livni who was responsible for Operation Cast Lead in which some 1,400 civilians were killed. 

When Operation Protective Edge, which killed 2,200 Palestinians, including 550 children, was in full swing a popular chant amongst the Nationalist Right was ''There's No School Tomorrow, There's No Children Left in Gaza!'.  There was no condemnation of this or other outbursts of hatred against Palestinians or indeed that tiny minority of Israelis who took to the streets to protest against the war.

Chief of the racists and hate merchants, he of ‘the Arabs are voting in droves’, Benjamin Netanyahu ‘strongly condemned the "shocking images" in the wedding video.  

The context for the release of this video clip, whose date is unknown, is the arrest of 4 of the suspected arsonists who set fire to the Dawabshe’s home.  Shin Bet and the Israeli government has been under immense pressure to find the culprits.  The Israeli Police don’t do forensics and investigations.  As in the case of Palestinians they simply use torture to extract confessions.  What has been new in this case is that the Jewish youth believed responsible for the arson have also been tortured.

This has produced a canpaign by the Jewish Right against the torture of the Jewish youth involved.  Note that these hypocrites have no objection to torture per se, they have no problem with torturing Palestinians but they do object to such methods being used against the flower of the Zionist settler youth.  It is settled policy of the government and the courts that Shin Bet are allowed to use ‘moderate physical pressure’ i.e. torture against Palestinian detainees.  What is new is its use against Jews.  

Naftali  Bennett was quite explicit in this respect when he said that ‘“What was done to the Duma detainees is for certain not more, and probably less, than what is done regularly to Palestinian terror suspects,” he said.

There are not many Western countries, bearing in mind Israel's claim to be 'the only democracy in the Middle East' whose government ministers openly admit to the use of torture.

We should reject this hypocrisy.  The neo-Nazi settler youth are the product of the settler movement.  Both the Zionist right and left has supported and continues to support the settlers.  The killers of baby Ali Dawabshe and his parents learnt their trade in a settlement movement which has demonised the Palestinians for the past 47 years.  In order to justify the colonisation of Palestinian land, they had to dehumanise the Palestinians.  The racism of the settler wedding guests is not new.  They learned it as part of their education.  In a state founded and based on racism it is inevitable that there will be some who will take what they have learnt to its logical conclusion.

But the real objection to the settler wedding guests and the ‘hilltop youth’ (the ultra-racist Kahanists) is that some of them reject the Israeli state per se.  They want a Jewish theocracy, a halachic state.  This is the primary reason why there has now erupted a clash between the state and its Jewish terrorists.

Tony Greenstein 

Clip shows far-right wedding-goers celebrating Duma killings

Israeli youngsters, said to be friends of detainees in deadly firebombing, stab photo of 18-month-old victim; wave firebombs, rifles and knives at Jerusalem event
December 23, 2015

Screenshot of a video showing extremist Israeli Jewish wedding-goers celebrating the killings of the Dawabsha family. (screen capture: Channel 10)

Footage released on Wednesday showed dozens of young Israeli right-wing extremists, said to be linked to the suspected perpetrators of the Dawabsha family murder, celebrating the killing at a wedding last week. The images in the clip immediately sparked wide condemnation.

The video, aired by Channel 10, shows revelers at the Jerusalem celebration waving knives, rifles, pistols and a Molotov cocktail during the wedding.

Amid the festivities, a photo of baby Ali Dawabsha, who was burned to death in the July 31 firebombing in the West Bank village of Duma, is shown being repeatedly stabbed.

The crowd in the video chants the lyrics of a song which include a verse from Judges 16:28, quoting Samson, blinded in Gaza, saying “let me with one blow get revenge on the Philistines for my two eyes”— but changing the word Philistines to Palestine.

The couple whose wedding was being celebrated was said to be friends of Jewish extremists detained in connection with the firebombing attack.

The attack in Duma on July 31 killed three members of a Palestinian family. Only one member of the Dawabsha family — Ahmed, now 5 — survived the attack, and remains hospitalized in Israel. The 18-month-old baby Ali was killed on the night of the attack, while parents Riham and Saad succumbed to their injuries in the succeeding weeks.

Far-right Israeli wedding-goers stab a photo of 18-month-old Ali Dawabsha, killed in a deadly firebombing attack, allegedly by Jewish extremists, in July 2015 (screen capture: Channel 10)
According to the TV report, Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon broadcast the clip to settler leaders a 
few days ago, to underline that dozens of young extremists are passionately supportive of the alleged Jewish terrorists.

The TV report said the footage was a factor in the stream of statements of support from right-wing leaders for the Shin Bet security service in its battle against Jewish terrorism in the last few days.
According to Haaretz reporter Chaim Levinson on Twitter, the bride was arrested in the past for carrying out an attack against Palestinians, along with the wife of one of the main suspects in the Duma case. She received 350 hours of community service for the crime.

The video was met with harsh condemnation from across the political spectrum.

Minutes after the clip was aired, Zionist Union MK and former foreign minister Tzipi Livni got up before the Knesset and railed against the youngsters in the film, saying “this is the group that wants to destroy the Jewish Israel, to destroy this state from within, to destroy the government from within and sow hate.”

Far-right Israeli wedding-goers celebrate the killings of the Dawabsha family (screen capture: Channel 10)
Pointing at Jewish Home MK Bezalel Smotrich, Livni said: “These are the people you protest being interrogated by the Shin Bet.”

“My Judaism is not the Judaism of those dancing on the blood of babies,” she added on Twitter.
Smotrich condemned the “evil price tag ideology,” referring to right-wing attacks against Palestinians, but attempted to disassociate himself from the extremists, saying it “is not the way of religious Zionism, period.”

“The demonic dance with the picture of the murdered baby represents a dangerous ideology and the loss of humanity,” he said, according the Israel National News website.

Opposition leader Isaac Herzog termed the revelers “maniacs.”

“Lowlifes, you forgot what it is to be Jewish. You disgrace the kippah, the prayer shawl, and the name of God. Those who dance at a wedding and celebrate the death of a baby in his sleep are not Jews and not Israeli. They should be locked up as soon as possible,” he said in a tweet.

In a statement, the Joint List of Arab parties said the Israeli government and defense minister, “who let the settlers attack Palestinians without facing punishment, are the first ones to blame for this terror network.”

The party urged Israeli society to “wake up” and see that “the hatred and terror are the inevitable result of military control and occupation of a civilian population.”

A far-right Israeli wedding-goer celebrates the murder of the Dawabsha family (screen capture: Channel 10)
Agriculture Minister Uri Ariel (Jewish Home), an outspoken supporter of the settlement movement, condemned the participants at the wedding.

“The clip published by Channel 10 news this evening is shocking and one cannot allow the activity of radical groups fueled by hate,” Ariel wrote on Facebook.

“Violence and support of violence deserve only condemnation. This is not the path of Zionism and this is not the path of the settlement movement,” wrote Ariel, who a day earlier had called for the Shin Bet to close down its division that deals with Jewish terror cases.

The video clip was also denounced by Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi David Lau, who said it went against Jewish tradition. Other religious figures also spoke out against it.

The video comes as the Shin Bet has faced criticism from some right-wing activists over claims that it has tortured suspects detained in connection with the Duma attack.

An unspecified number of Jewish suspects have been arrested in connection with the attack, which is being investigated as an act of terrorism. Details of the investigation, and the identity of the suspects, have been withheld from publication by a court-imposed gag order.

Earlier Wednesday, Education Minister Naftali Bennett doubled down on his criticism of figures in the religious Zionist community for their condemnation of the Shin Bet, calling them hypocrites.
Saad and Riham Dawabsha, with baby Ali. All three died when the Dawabsha home in the West Bank village of Duma was firebombed, by suspected Jewish extremists, on July 31, 2015 (Channel 2 screenshot)
Speaking at a conference of the right-wing weekly B’sheva, the Jewish Home party leader reiterated 
comments he made a day earlier denouncing right-wing extremists as “terrorists,” and said it was hypocritical to oppose interrogation methods considered acceptable against Palestinians.

“What was done to the Duma detainees is for certain not more, and probably less, than what is done regularly to Palestinian terror suspects,” he said.

See also Israeli Terror Suspect, Amiram Benoliel, Confesses to Dawabsheh Murder , Richard Silverstein

Israeli PM condemns video of Jewish extremists celebrating toddler's death Guardian 24.12.15.



HAPPY XMAS FROM THE ZIONIST STATE

Tories Propose to Prevent Councils Boycotting Repressive Regimes

$
0
0
Boycott of Israel and Saudi Arabia outlawed as local authorities must follow Tory foreign policy

Jewish Communities throughout the world boycotted Nazi Ger many - only the Zionists traded with them
Under pressure from Zionist and similar right-wing bodies in this country, the Tories are intending to introduce regulations which prevent them from boycotting Israeli goods or firms that operate in Israel or the Occupied Territories.
The Tories Opposed the Boycott of Apartheid South Africa and supported 'constructive engagement' with Apartheid
Matthew Hancock - Tory Scumbag Who Supports Israel's Occupation and Repression in Palestine
Of course from the Zionist point of view this is quite logical or consistent.  Whereas 99% of Jewry in the 1930’s supported an economic and cultural boycott of Nazi Germany, the Zionists negotiated a trade agreement, Ha'avara, with the Nazis which resulted in 60% of capital investment in the Jewish economy in Palestine between 1933 and 1939 coming from Nazi Germany! [David Rosenthall, Jewish Frontier, Vol. LXV, No. 3 (632) MAY/JUNE 1998] Israel literally owes its foundation to Hitler. Even the bourgeois Jewish Chronicle condemned Ha'avara as an ‘unclean thing’.
The Sodastream Shop in Brighton Succumbed to the Boycott - We were helped in our campaign by local Zionist campaigners who created more disruption than us!
Boycott has been the traditional weapon of the oppressed – from the boycott of slave grown sugar in the West Indies to the Boycott of Nazi Germany and the boycott of Apartheid in South Africa.
All of these expressions of solidarity with the oppressed have been opposed by the Conservatives in their time.  It is no wonder that they oppose a boycott of Israeli goods today alongside their Zionist friends.
The Response of the Jewish Community in the 1930's was to  Boycott Nazi Germany - only the Zionists and the Jewish bourgeoisie objected
We should demand that Councils ignore these regulations as they are in breach of international law and provide aid and succour  some of the world’s foulest and most repressive regimes, Israel and Saudia Arabia included.
The first known Boycott was the boycott of slave-grown sugar - naturally the Tories opposed this too as the plantation owners were Tories!  The Zionists weren't yet in existence
Yesterday South Africa, today Israel
Perhaps Albert Einstein summed it up best in comments directed against Wilhelm Furtwangler, the world famous conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra.  Einstein stated that 'If the organisation of German musical life may be compared to military organisation, Furtwangler plays the part of a commander-in-chief...'

The Jewish Chronicle advocating the Cultural Boycott - in the 1930's!  Under Editor Stephen Pollard, the JC opposes all anti-racist boycotts
The Daily Express is owned today by Zionist pornographer Richard Desmond - in the 1930's it supported Hitler and twisting truth on its head portrayed the Boycott of Nazi Germany, not as a defensive weapon, but as a declaration of war against Hitler!  Today the Express opposes the Boycott of Apartheid Israel

US actors call for the boycott of Nazi Germany-1938
See also A History of the Boycott – The Weapon of the Oppressed

Tony Greenstein

The Guardian 3.10.15.

Government plans to prevent procurement campaigns that conflict with national policy – such as those against Israel and UK arms companies.
Jewish Chronicle article on the world famous conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic Orchestra, Dr Furtwangler and Einstein's comments on  his role
There was a time when the Jewish Chronicle supported a Boycott against racist states
Councils and local authorities are to be blocked from boycotting Israeli products or pursuing other foreign policy goals that conflict with the government.
Massive Jewish Boycott Meeting in Madison Square Gardens, New York
Conservative aides said the measure was a response to growing concern about the “militant actions of leftwing councils” that they claimed was spurred on by the Labourleadership.
The Jewish Chronicle condemned the Zionist collaborators for making a trade agreement with the Nazis when everyone else was boycotting them - it called Haa'vara an 'unclean thing'
The Successful Boycott of Sodastream in Brighton, Sussex
The Jewish Chronicle's attitude to the Boycott of Sodastream was the same as that of the Daily Mail towards the Boycott of Nazi Germany 

The new rules will stop politically motivated boycott and divestment campaigns by town halls against UK defence companies and against Israel.
Even the Women's Shopping League supported the Boycott of Nazi Germany
The Cabinet Office minister, Matthew Hancock, said the action was intended to prevent “playground politics” from councils.
The Boycott of Slave Grown Sugar
Even in Latvia there was a large Boycott campaign
The government will amend pension legislation to make clear that using pensions and procurement policies to pursue boycotts, divestments and sanctions campaigns against other countries and the UK defence industry are inappropriate, unless they are in line with action on a national level.

The Murder of Laquan McDonald by Chicago Police

$
0
0
Meribah Knight December 28, 2015



It’s nice to have a story, from the liberal Jewish paper The Forward, where Jewish people are in the forefront of the fight against racism.  Normally the story is of murders and racism by Jewish people in the context of the Israeli state and how it is ‘anti-Semitic’ to tell the truth.

We see in this case, the murder of an unarmed black teenager, by armed cops who fire 16 bullets into the kid when he is already lying wounded on the ground.

Chicago Police are literally a law unto themselves.  Earlier this year the Guardian revealed in Homan Square revealed: how Chicago police'disappeared' 7,000 people, how people were held in secret, physically abused and tortured, had no access to lawyers, received little or no food or water and had effectively disappeared.  They weren't booked in and given access to a lawyer as would normally happen in a police station or holding centre.  [see Civil lawsuit alleges abuse at Chicago police Homan Square detention center 
All of this has been presided over by Rahm Emanuel, Chicago’s Mayor, an ultra-Zionist and former Chief of Staff to Obama.  Many and loud are the calls for this reprobate’s resignation.  Under pressure Emanuel has been forced to dismiss Chicago’s Police chief. 

You will see from the two videos above firstly the execution of Laquan McDonald and secondly about the destruction of a crucial video tape from a local Burger King by Police immediately after the shooting and the threats made to witnesses to the shootings, cars stuck in traffic, to disappear.

This is democracy US style.  The judges’ involvement in the case has been to help the Police cover up the murder by allowing them to keep the tape of the murder under wraps until the pressure became too great, not least because the City of Chicago was forced to settle with the family of Laquan McDonald for $5 million.

It also occurred to me that because thousands of people are dying in Syria and Iraq since this incident, that it might be construed, according to the normal Zionist logic, that telling this story is itself anti-American.  Indeed because the Mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, is a Jewish Zionist it is probably anti-Semitic as well since anyone who ever ‘singles out’ Israel for criticism is automatically being anti-Semitic unless they have condemned each and every human rights violation in every other state in the world!  Of course it could just be that Rahm Emanuel got mixed up and thought that Chicago was actually a city in Israel where this type of thing is normal.  It's really hard to say what was going through the Mayor's mind but of one thing I'm sure - it's definitely anti-Semitic to criticise him!

Tony Greenstein

CHICAGO — It all started with a phone call. In early November 2014, Craig Futterman, a civil rights attorney and law professor at the University of Chicago Law School, heard his phone ring. The caller, a source within Chicago law enforcement, told Futterman about the existence of a dash-cam video showing a black teenager being shot by a white police officer. What it depicted, the source said, was shocking.
Homan Square
Weeks earlier, the police department had issued a generic statement about the October 20 shooting of a 17-year-old African American, Laquan McDonald, who police said had lunged at officers with a knife in the city’s Archer Heights neighborhood, a largely Polish enclave in Chicago’s southwest sector. One of the officers shot the teen in the chest, and he was later pronounced dead, the police said. But this video, the source told Futterman, flatly contradicted that account.

“This looked like nothing short of an execution,” Futterman recalled the source saying. “They shot him like he was a dog in the street.”  His source went on to explain that the teen never lunged at the officers but was, in fact, veering away from them when an officer shot him, emptying his pistol and ultimately hitting McDonald 16 times.

Hearing Their Stories: Jamie Kalven (at right, standing) and Craig Futterman (sitting to Kalven’s left) talk with students at Hyde Park Academy about their interactions with police.
Make sure this doesn’t go away, don’t let it get buried, the source told Futterman, who continues to protect this person’s request for anonymity. So shortly after, from his Hyde Park office, Futterman called his longtime colleague, Jamie Kalven, a writer and activist, and they began to dig in.

The two men knew each other well; they’d been working together for nearly two decades on issues of police accountability and social justice. But they also share a heritage: Both hail from Jewish backgrounds, Futterman from the Northern suburbs and Kalven from the city’s South Side. For years they have pushed the Chicago Police Department for transparency and for answers. Today, however, it is not lost on these two Jews that what’s come of their crusade has not only upended the city, but also threatens the political viability of its first Jewish mayor, Rahm Emanuel.

Arrestees often are not processed at the Homan Square facility, in apparent violation of Chicago police directives. Photograph: The Guardian
There is such hostility toward the mayor because of this,” Kalven said, referring to the consequences of their efforts. But, he added, such anger is misguided and shortsighted. Emanuel inherited this problem. “He did not create it. And having his head on a stick is not going to cure it,” Kalven added. “The only way forward…is police reform in Chicago.”

After hearing from Futterman’s tipster, Futterman and Kalven tracked down witnesses, obtained the autopsy of McDonald’s body, gathered confirming accounts and, in a widely distributed statementon December 14, 2014, revealed the existence of the video that the city had sought to keep under wraps.
Rahm Emanuel.
The two men publicly demanded the video’s release. And when the city refused multiple requests, Futterman helped bring a lawsuit against the city, arguing in court that the public had a right to see it.

At the time Futterman initiated his campaign, Emanuel was running for re-election in what turned out to be a very tough race. In February, three days after the incumbent mayor was forced into an unexpected runoff, lawyers for the McDonald family contacted the city seeking $16 million in compensation. By this point, the family lawyers had themselves obtained a copy of the video through a subpoena. Lawyers for the city reached a settlement for $5 million with the family in mid-March, even before the family filed a suit. But the settlement required approval by the City Council, which did not come until April 15—eight days after Emanuel won his runoff.
Image: getty images Rahm Emanuel.
The settlement included a provision requiring that the video of McDonald’s death be kept private until the completion of an investigation.

It was not until November 26, thirteen months after the shooting, that the city produced the video under a judge’s order. It showed exactly what Futterman’s source had described. Just hours before the forced release of the video — and more than one year after the killing — the Cook County state’s attorney announced the indictment of police officer Jason Van Dyke on a charge of first-degree murder for shooting McDonald multiple times.
Image: Patricia Evans  Jamie Kalven.
“There are very few things in life that are black and white, but this pretty much is. It’s an execution,” Futterman said.

Critics have charged that the city fought release of the video at Emanuel’s instigation, to prevent it from exploding his re-election prospects. It’s a charge that the mayor has adamantly and repeatedly denied, saying he himself did not view the video until the public did. Its public release earlier, he said, would have contradicted long-established city policy of holding onto such evidence during the course of a live criminal investigation.

After Van Dyke’s indictment, the policeman’s attorney, Daniel Herber, told the Chicago Tribune
“This is not a murder case,” and that his client has a “valid defense.”

In recent weeks, Futterman and Kalven’s dogged efforts have culminated in massive political fallout. Protesters spilled into the streets of Chicago, disrupting holiday shopping and demanding Emanuel’s resignation. The mayor summarily dismissed the city’s police chief, Garry McCarthy, and the head of the police oversight agency. The Justice Department has launched a wide-ranging investigation into the police department, and some angry residents are demanding a recall election to force the mayor and the state’s attorney out.

Neither state nor city law contain any provisions for a recall election. But the calls to hold Emanuel and other city officials accountable are likely to only intensify with the mortal shootings by Chicago police on Saturday of an unarmed mother of five and a 19-year-old college student, both black, in an apartment building on the city’s predominantly black West Side.

Bettie Jones, 55, was shot through the door of her first-floor apartment, according to her cousin, Evelyn Glover. Reporters on the scene found a single bullet hole in the wooden door to her apartment. Police said Jones was killed by accident and extended their condolences. The college student, Quintonio LeGrier, was shot seven times, according to his mother Janet Cooksey. Family members said police were called after LeGrier, who was said to be suffering from mental illness, threatened his father with a metal baseball bat.

The police department provided scant additional information, saying an unspecified weapon was recovered and no officers were hurt. Police did not say whether there was a video of the incident and provided no information on the officers involved.

Whatever happens now, nearly all agree that Kalven and Futterman’s work helped expose the lack of transparency and failed response by the city, setting off the subsequent firestorm. But for Kalven and Futterman, their work on police accountably in Chicago has been more of a slow burn, spanning 15 years of daily phone calls and twice-weekly meetings, plotting their strategy and next steps. Their partnership has been a fruitful collaboration between a civil rights lawyer and an activist, working to empower the city’s most vulnerable citizens. “It’s a symbiotic relationship,” Futterman said.

In early November they launched the Citizens Police Data Project, an unparalleled public database of 56,000 misconduct complaint records for more than 8,500 Chicago police officers. It is the result of a decade of diligent work together and a successful 2014 landmark case, Kalven v. Chicago, which held that documents of allegations of police abuse are public information. But the police union is actively fighting the decision, and a judge barred the release of any misconduct records older than four years while the city and union go through arbitration. If the union doesn’t prevail, the database will soon be flooded with the disciplinary history of every Chicago police officer since 1967.
“If we win, having built the database infrastructure, we will make this extraordinary body of information public,” Kalven said. Indeed, no such thing exists in the country.

Kalven, 67, who has deep-set eyes framed by a full head of silver hair and a matching beard, is the son of the renowned lawyer and First Amendment scholar Harry Kalven Jr. The elder Kalven, a professor at the University of Chicago, kept the company of legends such as writer Saul Bellow and legal scholar Hans Zeisel. (He once defended controversial nightclub comedian Lenny Bruce.)
Kalven was raised in a secular Jewish household in the racially integrated Hyde Park neighborhood, where he still lives today with his wife Patsy Evans, a photographer. But it was not until his father died unexpectedly in 1974 of a heart attack at age 60 that Kalven took on a task that became a journey tinged with a sense of religious mission.

At his death, Kalven’s father left behind more than 1,000 pages of unedited manuscript for a book on freedom of speech and civil liberties. Kalven took it upon himself to finish what his father had started and spent the next 14 years on it.

“The work on my father’s book was this intensely talmudic exercise,” Kalven said; so much so that in the afterword of the completed book, titled “A Worthy Tradition: Freedom of Speech in America,” 
Kalven cited a quote from the Talmud itself: “It is not upon you to finish the work; neither are you free to desist from it.”

Kalven’s work as a self-proclaimed “human rights” journalist and community organizer includes a decade he spent working in Chicago’s public housing projects — primarily Stateway Gardens in the city’s Bronzeville neighborhood — turning vacant lots into gardens, cleaning out decrepit apartments, planting scores of trees on its grounds.

It was there, he says, that he saw police misconduct run rampant.

“It took me a while to see how different and disturbing patterns of policing were,” he said. “Once I saw it, I could not not see it. It became more and more central to my work to document and understand.”

Futterman, 49, who is the director of the Police Accountability Clinic at University of Chicago Mandel Legal Aid Clinic, grew up in the staunchly middle-class suburb of Niles, to the city’s northwest, in, he said, “a Jewish home with a strong sense of a Jewish identity.” But Futterman, who stands 6 feet tall with a broad smile and a smoothly shaved head, spent much of his childhood on Chicago’s predominantly black South Side with his grandparents, with whom he was very close. They were the only Jewish family in the mostly African-American Auburn Gresham neighborhood, and Futterman said he was welcomed by neighbors and found an extended family there. He observed for himself the stark realities of the city’s pernicious segregation and socioeconomic inequalities. But there was also a point of connection. “As a Jewish person, I identified far more with discrimination and racism,” he said.

Married now for 21 years to Kenyatta Tatum Futterman, who is African American, Futterman finds that his notions of race and religion are all the more entwined. The couple has two daughters, both of whom celebrated their bat mitzvahs at Temple Sinai, a Reform congregation that is home to the now retired rabbi who married Futterman and his wife. “I have black and Jewish family members. It’s who I am. It’s who my family is. I don’t consider those identities in tension with one another,” he explained.

After working as a Cook County public defender and civil rights lawyer at a boutique firm, Futterman took a teaching job at Stanford University’s law school, where he also directed the school’s public interest program. When he left California in 2000 for a job at the University of Chicago, a mutual friend introduced him to Kalven. The connection was immediate. Futterman was looking to do a citywide project on police misconduct. With Kalven’s help he began to focus on the areas of the city where Kalven, in his work at Stateway Gardens, had seen officers act with impunity.

“Our collaboration came to be very central to that project,” Kalven said. Over time, the combination of Kalven’s reporting skills and Futterman’s legal work resulted in multiple federal and civil rights suits. Futterman and his students would regularly work out of Kalven’s office in a Stateway high rise.

“Craig and Jamie’s values are so similar,” said Sunny Fischer, the former executive director of the Richard H. Driehaus Foundation and a longtime friend of Kalven’s. “It’s just a fabulous partnership, and it has made a huge difference for the city and people and communities that were abandoned.” 
Fischer currently serves on the governing board of the Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law.

Kalven and Futterman both say they are concerned with the issue of black-on-black violence, which some point out kills many more people than police shootings. But Futterman said, “That is not the fundamental focus of the work that I do.” Choosing the battle they feel they are in a position to fight, they see their work to be the fight for police accountability and transparency.

Lately, Futterman and Kalven have been working around the clock. There is so much more to be done, and both are acutely aware that this tsunami of attention — from MSNBC, The Huffington Post, The New York Times, The New Yorker and Politico — must be harnessed.

Futterman reminds me in our interview that the tip about the McDonald video “is far from the first call I have gotten like this.” What’s more, the police union is fighting the release of the police records Futterman and Kalven fought for, and won, in court. The union is citing a provision of its contract with the city that says misconduct files should be destroyed after five or seven years, depending on the category of the file.

In other words, in the midst of a DOJ inquiry into the city’s police department, its history dating back to 1967 is at risk of going up in flames. “The stakes are really high,” Kalven said. “It’s like the institution blinding itself.”

The Fraternal Order of Police did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

And so, Kalven and Futterman continue their fight. Both admit they have had little sleep and even less time to process and reflect on what they’ve done, or how their work has pushed this city over a difficult but necessary precipice toward honesty and transparency, and meaningful reform.

But there was a time — in the midst of fighting for the video and pleading McDonald’s case to the public — when Futterman and Kalven felt like the city was stuck in a cycle of denial and dishonesty. 
“Part of what this case revealed is the very nature of the norm,” Futterman said. “Immediately the machine of denial goes into effect and the code of silence goes into effect, and this case is an example of that.”

Today both men see an important shift — post-Ferguson, post-Baltimore, post-Staten Island, post-Chicago.

“Collectively, in Chicago and around the nation, we are in a very different place,” Futterman said, citing the work of young organizers and massive protests after the killings of black men by police or in their custody.

It’s “forcing all of us to grapple with the everyday realities and police abuse in black and brown communities,” he said. “It’s forcing us to care.”

Contact Meribah Knight at feedback@forward.com

Jingo - the ideal New Year’s Game Everyone Can Play

$
0
0

See how many excuses for Israel you can score!

(Apologies - Jewdas seem to have missed out the 'new' anti-Semitism and the singling out of Israel from all the other wicked Gentile nations)




Defending the 'Auschwitz Borders' against Unarmed Civilians as Sami Madi is mowed down

$
0
0
Despite Israel's claim that its main opponent in Gaza is Hamas, it continues to kill peaceful protesters against the siege and blockade of Gaza.  In the instance below Israel opened fire on unarmed demonstrators who approached the boundary of Gaza and Israel.  T

In Auschwitz, any prisoner who approached the electrified fences was immediately the target of machine gun fire from the watchtowers and many died as a result.  Israelis call what was formerly known as the Green Line, dividing 1948-1967 Israel from the West Bank and Gaza, the 'Auschwitz borders'.  Little did we know that what they meant by that was the execution of any Palestinian who had the audacity to approach the border.

We mourn  you Sami.

Tony Greenstein

The daughter of Palestinian Sami Madi is comforted by a relative as she cries during her father's funeral in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza. AFP PHOTO / SAID KHATIB / AFP / SAID KHATIB
Shawki Madi still cannot believe the embrace from his father that Friday would be their last.
The 16-year-old boy was playing football with friends on 11 December when a relative came to tell him that his father had been killed and that he should go home.

I did not believe it, but I ran home and found everyone in tears,” Shawki told The Electronic Intifada.

Shawki’s father, Sami Madi, 41, had led a demonstration that day to mark the 48th anniversary of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP).
A relative of Sami Madi mourns over his coffin
Demonstrators headed for the boundary with Israel by al-Bureij refugee camp in central Gaza.
There, Israeli soldiers opened fire. It was not the first such demonstration since the “intifada of the knives” erupted in Jerusalem in October. At least 20Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces in Gaza since then, most of them during demonstrations.
Palestinians carry the body of Sami Madi during his funeral in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, on 12 December.  Yasser Qudih APA images

On this Friday, 17 unarmed people were wounded, including two children and a journalist. Only Sami was killed.

The PFLP had called for a “day of rage”— a common phrase denoting a day of popular demonstration and anger — to commemorate the anniversary, and urged its supporters to prove that Gaza can still play a role even when the focus is elsewhere. Demonstrating at the boundary was meant to show solidarity with those in the West Bank who are engaged in daily confrontations with the Israeli occupation.

That Gaza had played little role in these events disturbed Sami, said his father Shawki, for whom Sami’s son was named. “Demonstrating at the border gave him some relief; it proved that Gaza should not be out of the game,” he said.

The 68-year-old man denounced the deadly use of live fire against the unarmed protesters. “What kind of threat did my son and other protesters pose to heavily armed soldiers?” he asked. He referred to the footage of the demonstration as proof. “All they wanted to do was carry the Palestinian flag.”
Video from a protest in the same area last month shows Israeli forces firing on and critically wounding 22-year-old Muhammad al-Bhaisy after he mounted a Palestinian flag on the boundary fence.

Devoted comrade

Sami was a lifelong PFLP activist. His affiliation to the left wing Palestinian resistance faction began during the first Palestinian intifada in the mid-1980s when as a teenager he would throw stones at vehicles going to and from the Israeli settlements built on Gaza’s land.

He was wounded in both legs at 19 by two Israeli rubber-coated steel bullets and his father remembers him as a “rebellious” youth. “That was observed in the first intifada,” Shawki said.
As a law student, Sami represented the PFLP in universities and colleges across Gaza, where he organized activities to raise the political and the revolutionary awareness of Palestinian students.
In Deir al-Balah, where he was born and raised, his small rented apartment looks shabby. Its foundations were weakened during Israel’s bombardments last year as well as by floods during Gaza’s rainy season.

He is well-known here among other residents. He was the head of the PFLP’s factional committee in Deir al-Balah, a group that responded to emergencies as part of its duties. During Israeli attacks, members of the committee would help evacuate people in areas under attack.

To be effective, they had to be quick. And Sami was fast. According to Aysar Aman, the PFLP representative in central Gaza, Sami’s speed of thought and action was “a lifesaver” for many in Deir al-Balah and other areas.

Aman remembers Sami fondly. “He was a devoted comrade. He provided leadership. He was always effective,” Aman said.

He also used to distribute food parcels for people in remote areas during wars, said Aman, a job that demanded real courage.

“He managed to deliver basic relief for people in wars, even though he knew that he was a potential target,” he added.
Family man

Sami’s funeral saw people from near and far flock to his house to offer condolences, much to the family’s surprise. He was remembered in a speech given by the PFLP’s leader in Gaza, Jamil Mizher, on 12 December, in another rally marking the movement’s 48th anniversary.

Calling him “a defiant fighter whose blood will be a further step on liberation’s path,” Mizher added, “He was a dedicated comrade, and an eloquent orator whose deeds matched his words.”

Sami was also the head of the media committee of the PFLP in which capacity he would produce documentaries about the Palestinian cause. What would prove to be his last production is about the Nakba— the ethnic cleansing of Palestine in 1948 — and will be shown as part of the movement’s anniversary commemorations.

Above all, Sami was a family man. The eldest son of Shawki, he was, in the words of his father, “obliging and responsible.”

A former policeman, he drew a wage with the Palestinian Authority with which he would help pay for his siblings’ education.

“We are all indebted to him,” said his brother Mahmoud, for whom Sami paid university tuition fees.
Sami leaves behind seven children, the youngest a two-year-old girl.

“What breaks my heart is that his children have started to call me ‘dad’ instead of ‘grandfather.’ They are not prepared to absorb the ordeal of losing their father,” Shawki said.

Isra Saleh el-Namey is a journalist from Gaza. 

Israeli ambassador flings Nazi label at Israeli leaders, after latest authoritarian step

$
0
0
And for those who doubt any of this, don’t forget to repeat the mantra ‘Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East’

It comes to a pretty pass when Israel's own ambassador compares the latest piece of racist legislation to that of the Nazis!

Tony Greenstein

Israel forces left-wing NGO’s that receive foreign funding to wear special stickers in the Knesset

Philip Weiss on December 29, 2015

Ambassador Caspi posts image of Hermann Goering to warn Israel about what it is becoming
In Peace Now’s daily news digest, thisquote tops the list today:
Quote of the day:
From Peace Now Blog
“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are under attack and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.”

–A quote by Nazi war criminal Hermann Goering, posted by Israeli Ambassador to Switzerland, Yigal Caspi, on Facebook, following the passing of the NGO bill.**
Yigal Caspi, image on twitter
Caspi has removed the quotation. He clearly intended the comment as a warning to Israeli leaders. He is now under investigation for the statement. The NGO bill is a new law that forces left leaning human-rights groups that receive substantial funds from overseas to wear labels when they come to the Israeli Knesset. Peace Now continues, “Another hot topic today was the comparisons to Nazis.”
Hebrew University lecturer Dr. Ofer Cassif wrote on Facebook that Justice Minister Shaked is ‘Neo-Nazi scum’ and told Army Radio afterward, “I think it’s fair to compare Israel to Germany in the 1930s, and not to the years of genocide. Cassif pointed to the Im Tirtzu video and Shaked’s NGO law. The article in Ynet noted that the Facebook posts come in the wake of the passing of the NGO bill, but it doesn’t mention that the bill requires the (mostly left-wing) NGO representatives to wear a special badge when they visit the Knesset committees to indicate that they receive more than 50% of their contributions from foreign states. 

Cassif shared on Facebook the post by his colleague Professor Amiram Goldblum, who sharply criticized Shaked for not revealing that she received ‘blood money’ contributions from a Jewish Belgian donor who is now in jail for selling arms to rebels in Sierra Leone. Private donations are not required to be revealed by the bill. Cassif was not alone in his comparison of Israel’s right-wing government to the Nazis. 

Israeli Ambassador to Switzerland, Yigal Caspi, posted a quote by a Nazi warcriminal that described how fascist governments get their people to follow them, by “denouncing the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.” Caspi added: “We’re on the right path…” 

Now, the ambassador faces punishment by the Foreign Ministry. Oddly, the article by Yedioth’s Itamar Eichner did not mention the context of the posting of the quote: the government’s approval of the NGO bill that labels left-wing Israeli human rights organizations.

Let’s be clear: anyone on the American left who used Nazi analogies for Israel was shunned for doing so, but Israeli leaders throw the Nazi stuff around readily. (For good reason; we all know that victims model their abuser when they gain any power.)

The Nazi charges of course go to the treatment of Palestinians. The NGOs all care about Palestinians. In its news list, Peace Now also mentions the latest failure in the investigation of the Duma murderers, Jewish zealots who torched a sleeping Palestinian family in occupied territory last summer. (Peace Now is virtually alone among liberal Zionist groups in recognizing the significance of the Duma murders as evidence of lawlessness, racism, and the fear among Palestinians.)

Many friends are saying that Israel is cracking up. “The end,” “Imploding,” “It’s over,” are two comments I’ve heard in the last day or two. Even J Street seems rattled (“deeply concerned and disappointed”). New Yorker editor David Remnick just got back from Jerusalem and said on the radio this morning that the situation is “tragic” and that Israel bears the greater share of responsibility for the failure of peace talks.


This crisis has long been evident to Palestinians. The knife attacks are of course a symptom of their loss of any faith in the many promises of freedom they have been given. Now the questions are: How long can Israel play out this crisis, as yet another burp in the managed-conflict model of persecution. And having long said that the status quo is unsustainable, will American leaders at last take a stand against apartheid and colonization? Who will speak up here, and show real leadership? Bernie? (And, to be parochial: how many secular American Jews will openly take on their parents and say what they believe in their hearts, that Jewish nationalism, the idea of a “Jewish democracy” established on lands belonging largely to others, is a snare and a delusion?)

When Nuremberg Came to Israel

$
0
0
In Israel - mixed marriages are a no-no
You might, in your innocence, think that a book on an Arab-Jewish romance would be just the thing that would be welcomed as a way of breaking down barriers and enhancing understanding and tolerance between Palestinians and Israeli Jews.   However you would be very foolish to do so, because Israel operates under a different value system to most other societies. 

Israel is a Jewish racial state and miscegenation, the mixing of the ‘races’ is strictly forbidden in Israel.  Not legally of course, because Israel has to formally adhere to western values, but in the accepted and unwritten Zionist consensus.  A consensus that includes a shared practice and beliefs.  This consensus operates across all of Israel’s Zionist political parties from Likud to Labour.

Of course this is nothing new when it comes to settler colonial states.  Marriage and sex between the coloniser and colonised was banned or looked  upon with extreme disfavour in British colonies from India to Southern Africa.  It was termed ‘the Black peril’.   In South Africa the 1927 and 1950 Immorality Acts and the 1957 Sexual Offences Act forbade interracial sex and marriage. 

Nazi Germany had the 1935 Nuremberg Laws and specifically the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honour which specifically forbade sexual relations or marriage between Aryans and Jews (later amended to Romanis and Blacks).  Israel has no such Act but then it doesn’t need to ban Arabs and Jews from marrying.  It’s just that it is impossible for them to do so since there is no civil marriage in Israel. 
Benny Gopstein, Kahanist and Head of Lehava, fascist anti-miscegenation organisation
Of course it is still possible for Arabs and Jews to have sex and relationships outside of marriage which is why Israel’s Social Affairs Ministry, in its wisdom has given a grant of around £120,000 each year, about half its running costs, to Hemla, the ‘charitable’ wing of the fascist anti-miscegenation organisation, Lehava.  [A Strange Kind of Mercy, http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/a-strange-kind-of-mercy-1.364417]   The head of Lehava, who is also employed by Hemla, Benny Gopstein, supports the burning down of mixed Arab-Jewish schools (its supporters were convicted of arson at the Hand in Hand school in Jerusalem) and Christian churches.  The Knesset under the guidance of Israel’s Deputy Foreign Minister, Tzipi Hotoveli agreed to fund the good work of Hemla in helping to ‘rescue’ Jewish girls who had fallen for the wiles of Arab men.  Radical Jewishgroup’s head advocates burning churches 
Hemla - the 'charitable organisation' in  Jerusalem, funded by the Israeli government, which rescues fallen Jewish girls who have been seduced into relationships with Arab men
Because of western sensitivities, the criminalisation of interracial sex in Israel cannot be made a crime, though an Israeli Arab was gaoled for passing himself off as a Jew for the purpose of having sex with an Jewish woman.  Arab who posed as a Jew jailed for rape 'bydeception' 
Gopstein and thugs patrolling Jerusalem looking out for Arab men who might 'endanger' Jewish women.  'Jewish girls for a Jewish state' is their slogan
Extending this logic, then a married man who has sex with a woman, after telling her that he is single, could also be prosecuted for rape, even though the sexual intercourse was consensual.
So it is therefore quite understandable that a novel encouraging inter-racial sexual relations should be banned from schools where impressionable youngsters, who don’t understand the evils of Arab-Jewish romance, will be protected from harm.

It is worth reading the article Israel Bans Novel on Arab-Jewish Romance From Schools for 'Threatening Jewish Identity' in Ha'aretz to get the full flavour of the deeply ingrained racism in Israeli society.  The Ministry of Education, which has banned Dorit Rabinyan’s book, Borderlife, is headed by one of the principal racists of the Israeli government, Naftali Bennett of Habayit Hayehudi.
Gopstein temporarily under arrest
The acting Chair of the Education Ministry's pedagogic secretariat, Dalia Fenig [she is the acting Chair because Bennett dismissed the previous Chair] explained her reasons thus:  

“The work is contemporary and therefore presents the reader in a very tangible and powerful way with the dilemma of the institutionalization of the love while he [the reader] doesn’t have the full tools to weigh the decisions of such a nature,”

In other words, a young reader might be seduced by the message of love, regardless of the 'race' of the characters in the book, forgetting that Zionism dictates that the Jewish people must not become 'impure' by marrying out.  Fenig asserted that: 

The story is based on a romantic motif of impossible prohibited/secret love. Young people of adolescent age tend to romanticize and don’t, in many cases, have the systemic vision that includes considerations involving maintaining the national-ethnic identity of the people and the significance of miscegenation.”

And in this statement you get the full measure of the biological racism at the heart of Zionism and Israeli society.  As the author Dorit Rabinyan noted, 'There is something ironic in the fact that the novel that deals with the Jewish fear of assimilation in the Middle East was eventually rejected by this very fear.”

Tony Greenstein

Dorit Rabinyan reading from Persian Brides, an earlier novel
Israel takes another step down a very dark path. Here is the news from Haaretz today:

Israel Bans Novel on Arab-Jewish Romance From Schools for ‘Threatening Jewish Identity’

Israel’s Education Ministry has disqualified a novel that describes a love story between an Israeli woman and a Palestinian man from use by high schools..

Move comes despite the fact that the official responsible for teaching of literature in secular state schools recommended the book for use in advanced literature classes, as did a professional committee of academics and educators…

“Young people of adolescent age tend to romanticizing and don’t, in many cases, have the systemic vision that includes considerations involving maintaining the identity of the people and the significance of assimilation.”

The novel is Borderlife by Dorit Rabinyan. It is blurbed by Amos Oz. A description:

'What begins in the cold of early New York winter ends on a Jaffa beach at summer’s blinding peak. A chance encounter brings two strangers together: Liat, an Israeli from Tel Aviv, and Hilmi, a Palestinian born in Hebron. For one frozen winter away from home, on snowy streets, filled with longing for a Middle Eastern sun, Liat and Hilmi demarcate the place reserved only for them, an intimate short-term place, a universe for two. At the fissures and margins of things, in corners and in gaps, the reality lurking in Israel peers and snarls at them. The story, with its twists and passions, follows them even when they each go their own way – Liat returning to Tel Aviv and Hilmi to the village of Jifna, north of Ramallah – refusing to end.'

What will liberal Zionists say about this?  When do you conclude that this kind of intolerance and racism is built into the very idea of religious nationalism? Henry Siegman writes in Haaretz today that American liberal values are not shared by Israel. And yes, we’re trying to live up to them over here; but it’s impossible to imagine this kind of official action here.

Thanks to Ofer Neiman


Move comes despite the fact that the official responsible for teaching of literature in secular state schools recommended the book for use in advanced literature classes, as did a professional committee of academics and educators.

Or Kashti Dec 31, 2015 12:57 AM

Students taking a matriculation exam at a high school in Hadera. Alon Ron
Israel’s Education Ministry has disqualified a novel that describes a love story between an Israeli woman and a Palestinian man from use by high schools around the country. The move comes even though the official responsible for literature instruction in secular state schools recommended the book for use in advanced literature classes, as did a professional committee of academics and educators, at the request of a number of teachers.

Among the reasons stated for the disqualification of Dorit Rabinyan’s “Gader Haya” (literally “Hedgerow,” but known in English as “Borderlife”) is the need to maintain what was referred to as “the identity and the heritage of students in every sector,” and the belief that “intimate relations between Jews and non-Jews threatens the separate identity.” The Education Ministry also expressed concern that “young people of adolescent age don’t have the systemic view that includes considerations involving maintaining the national-ethnic identity of the people and the significance of miscegenation.”

The book, published in Hebrew by Am Oved about a year and a half ago, tells the story of Liat, an Israeli translator, and Hilmi, a Palestinian artist, who meet and fall in love in New York, until they part ways for her to return to Tel Aviv and he to the West Bank city of Ramallah. The book was among this year’s winners of the Bernstein Prize for young writers.

A source familiar with the ministry’s approach to the book said that in recent months a large number of literature teachers asked that “Borderlife” be included in advanced literature classes. After consideration of the request, a professional committee headed by Prof. Rafi Weichert from the University of Haifa approved the request. The committee included academics, Education Ministry representatives and veteran teachers. The panel’s role is to advise the ministry on various educational issues, including approval of curriculum.

According to the source, members of the professional committee, as well as the person in charge of literature studies, “thought that the book is appropriate for students in the upper grades of high schools – both from an artistic and literary standpoint and regarding the topic it raises. Another thing to remember is that the number of students who study advanced literature classes is anyhow low, and the choice of books is very wide.”

Another source in the Education Ministry said that the process took a number of weeks, and that “it’s hard to believe that we reached a stage where there’s a need to apologize for wanting to include a new and excellent book into the curriculum.” 
Dorit Rabinyan. Credit David Bachar
Education Minister Naftali Bennett’s office said: “The minister backs the decision made by the professionals.”

Two senior ministry officials, Eliraz Kraus, who is in charge of society-and-humanity studies, and the acting chair of the pedagogic secretariat, Dalia Fenig, made the decision to disqualify “Borderlife.”
At the beginning of December, the head of literature studies at the ministry, Shlomo Herzig, appealed their decision, but his appeal was recently denied.

“The hasty use, as I see it, of the disqualification of a work of literature from the body of work approved for instruction and included in literature curriculum doesn’t seem acceptable to me,” Herzig wrote to Fenig. “In all my all too many years as head of literature studies, I don’t recall even a single instance that a work of literature recommended by a professional committee by virtue of its authority, after thorough and deep discussion, was not approved for use by the chairman of the pedagogic secretariat.”

Herzig cites a portion of Fenig’s first letter of opposition to the book, which noted concern that it would encourage romantic relations between Jews and Arabs. “The acute problem of Israeli society today is the terrible ignorance and racism that is spreading in it, and not concern over intermarriage,” Herzig wrote. “The idea that a work of literature is liable to be the trigger for romanticizing such a connection in reality is simply ridiculous.” He added that he would expect the Education Ministry to be “a lighthouse of progress and enlightenment and not be dragged along by empty, baseless fears.”

“The most horrible sin that comes to mind in teaching literature (and other subjects) is eliminating all or some work which we don’t favor out of ethical considerations. In such a situation, there is no reason to teach literature at all. If we would have wanted our students to study only ‘respectable’ and conservative works, we would be left without a curriculum, or with a list of shallow and dull works of literature. Stellar international works such as ‘Crime and Punishment’ (the murder of elderly women), ‘Anna Karenina’ (betrayal and adultery), ‘Macbeth’ (the murder of a king and all of his relatives and members of his household) would not [get close] to a literature curriculum in an ethical literary ‘respectable’ world.”

Herzig asked for a rehearing of the issue at the pedagogic secretariat, which Fenig is temporarily heading since Bennett dismissed the previous chairman, Dr. Nir Michaeli. The post of chairman is considered one of the senior positions at the Education Ministry. The rehearing, in which Herzig and members of the professional committee members took part, didn’t reverse the decision to disqualify the book.

On Tuesday, Fenig sent another letter in which she explained the reasons for her decision. She noted that “in the Israeli reality of the Jewish-Arab conflict,” the book “in some classes” could “create the opposite result from what the work is seeing to present,” but dedicated most of her comments to concern over contact between Jews and Arabs.

“The work is contemporary and therefore presents the reader in a very tangible and powerful way with the dilemma of the institutionalization of the love while he [the reader] doesn’t have the full tools to weigh the decisions of such a nature,”Fenig asserted. “The story is based on a romantic motif of impossible prohibited/secret love. Young people of adolescent age tend to romanticize and don’t, in many cases, have the systemic vision that includes considerations involving maintaining the national-ethnic identity of the people and the significance of miscegenation.”

Fenig added: “Works of literature are very powerful. And critical discussion to be held in class, if it is held, will not stand up to the very powerful message in the work that what was right and good was fulfilling the love between Hilmi and Liat.”

She predicted that many parents in the state school system would strongly object to having their children study the novel and would view it as a violation of the relationship of trust between parents and the school system. “It should be remembered that the choice of studying the work is the teachers’ and not the students’. Intimate relations and certainly the open option of institutionalizing [a relationship] through marriage and having a family, even if it doesn’t come to fruition in the story, between Jews and non-Jews is perceived among large segments of society as a threat to a separate identity.”

Rabinyan’s previous publications – “Our Weddings” and “Am Oved”– are taught in schools. According to the author, “It’s a great honor that my creations pierce the souls of young people and affect them. I would be happy if Israeli literature teachers were given the authority to choose whether to teach ‘Borderlife’ as well.”

She added, “I write novels for adults and ‘Borderlife’ also tells the story of intelligent adults. The hero of the story grew up and developed within the borderlines set by Israeli society, among the Jewish majority, the Arab minority and the Palestinian neighbors. Her difficult choice, to turn away from love, is the choice of a young woman whose main Zionist identity is deeply ingrained within her. There is something ironic in the fact that the novel that deals with the Jewish fear of assimilation in the Middle East was eventually rejected by this very fear.”

The Education Ministry said, “Professionals discussed the topic of including the work in the curriculum. After carefully examining all the considerations, and after weighting the advantages and disadvantages, the professionals decided to not include the work in the curriculum for five-unit literature studies,” referring to advanced literature classes.

Literary works that also told the stories of Jews who marry outside the faith include Haim Bialik’s “Behind the Fence,” Isaac Bashevis Singer’s “The Slave,” Shmuel Yosef Agnon’s “The Lady and the Peddler” and Sami Michael in “A Trumpet in the Wadi.” All were and some still are taught in schools.

The Hidden Side of Apartheid Israel

$
0
0
I’m not talking about the West Bank, but Israel behind the so-called Green Line.  Virtually every aspect of life – education, employment, housing, welfare is segregated.  Towns and villages are established that are Jewish only – part of the programme to ‘Judaify’ the Galilee, Jerusalem or the Negev.

Of course none of this is actually stipulated in legislation.  There are no signs saying ‘No Arabs’ but there doesn’t need to be.  In the West Bank the army patrols under orders to prevent Arabs using ‘Jewish only’ roads.
Israeli Palestinian couple barred from renting a house in a Jewish village
In Israel  proper there is a complex interconnection of adminstrative practices, Zionist organisations which pursue of ‘Jews only’ policy and deceptively labelled legislation which guarantees that Arabs and Jews will not mix and that Arab services such as housing will remain eternally inferior.

‘Under the guise of the deceptively mundane name "Amendment to the Cooperative Associations Bill," the Knesset's Constitution, Law and Justice Committee this week finalized a bill intended to bypass previous rulings of the High Court of Justice. If indeed this legislation is approved by the Knesset plenum, it will not be possible to describe it as anything other than an apartheid law.'

The legislation was passed, as the Access to Communities Law and it enabled villages of communities in Israel to block Arabs buying houses or renting land in their villages because they would not ‘fit in’ to the social fabric.  Below is an article describing this process in the US Jewish Forward magazine.

Israel's Virulent Housing Bias Runs Deep — and It's Not Only Aimed at Arabs

Naomi Zeveloff December 29, 2015
AFULA, Israel - From her backyard deck in Yafia, an Arab village west of Nazareth, Iman Sharary, 53, pointed to a plot of land in the distance where her sons will build their homes.
She would have preferred her children stay in Yafia, but with land at a premium in the village, she and her husband sought and won the tender to build in a less expensive area. Afula Illit is a tree-lined suburb about 10 miles south of Yafia. It’s also predominantly Jewish.
After demands from Jewish residents of South Tel Aviv, there are now separate kindergartens for African refugee children
Now, the Sharary family is at the center of a local controversy with national proportions. One of dozens of Arab families from northern Israel that won tenders to build 49 homes in Afula Illit, the Shararys and their fellow Arab bidders face the fury of many of their potential Jewish neighbors.

Palestinian workers stand under a shelter to keep dry from the rain as they wait for transportation after crossing from the West Bank town of Qalqilya to work in Israel, at the Israeli army's checkpoint near Kibbutz Eyal in central Israel. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday, May 20, 2015, called off a proposed plan to segregate Palestinians from Israelis on West Bank buses, overruling his defense minister amid a flurry of criticism in an attempt to avert the first crisis of his new government. (AP Photo/Oded Balilty, File)
 Days after the tender process results were made public, a group of about 200 Afula residents staged a protest, calling on Mayor Yitzhak Meron to revoke the tenders. Demonstrators denounced him as a “traitor” and a “terrorist,” according to press reports. “He wants to build a mosque,” one sign at the protest read.
Protesting Against the Demolition of Al Araqab, a Bedouin village in the Negev
The Afula episode is only the latest real estate controversy with a racial tinge in Israel. According to the Walla news site, Jewish residents of Ofakim, a city west of Beersheba, won tenders to build in the city but canceled the transaction once they learned that 14 Bedouin residents were planning on settling in the same area.

Image: Naomi Zeveloff, Not in My City: Adeil Eluz, a gas station manager in Afula, is protesting against the prospect of Arabs moving in nearby.
And in November, the Bemuna construction company posted a video advertisement of an Ashkenazi family whose Hanukkah celebration was interrupted by Mizrahi neighbors — Jews of Arab origin — depicted as raucously ignorant of their Ashkenazi holiday traditions. The video, which the company later deleted, was an advertisement for a new housing development in Kiryat Gat that presumably would be free of Mizrahim. “Do you dream of owning your own home?” the voiceover said. “Want neighbors after your own heart?”

Now, Israel’s attorney general has demanded the Israel Land Authority to look into the charge of racial discrimination at Bemuna in the sale of the apartments.
Just as with South Africa's pass system, so Israeli Police scrutinise a Palestinian's Identity Card before telling him that he can only walk on one side of the road
These incidents and others in recent years speak to the deep segregation in Israel. With a few exceptions, like Haifa and Jaffa, Israel is a country split along ethnic and religious lines, with different school systems and population centers for each group. Officially speaking, “there is no legal basis in creating the segregation” when it comes to housing inside the Green Line, said Talya Steiner, a researcher at the Israel Democracy Institute. “It just kind of evolved.”

But the High Court has sanctioned such segregation in recent years by allowing Bemuna, the company with the anti-Mizrachi advertisement, to build housing explicitly marketed to Orthodox, so-called “national religious” Jews, who are predominantly Ashkenazi, in an Arab section of Jaffa.
There are other ways that the state maintains segregation and even helps to deepen inequality between sectors. One has to do with the ultra-Orthodox. Because Haredim, as they are known in Hebrew, have larger families and educate their children in sex-segregated schools, the Housing Ministry acknowledges and supports their need for separate neighborhoods to maintain their lifestyle. Yet the Housing Ministry ran up against “not in my backyard” attitudes from several municipalities when it tried to plan Haredi neighborhoods in cities with secular and national religious majorities. Now there is a major housing shortage for ultra-Orthodox Israelis.

Another form of state-sanctioned segregation is seen in small communities in Israel, such as kibbutzim or moshavim. These communities may screen new members based on standards such as “unsuitability to the community’s social life” or its “social-cultural fabric,” or to “unique characteristics of the community as defined in its bylaws,” according to a law upheld by the high court in 2014. Critics say this is actually code language to weed out Arabs, homosexuals or anyone outside the community norm.

Beyond the issue of segregation, Israel’s Arab villages and cities suffer from a lack of planning, which exacerbates the housing shortage in these areas. In 2000, after 13 Arab citizens were killed in demonstrations at the start of the second intifada, a state commission found that inequality between the Jewish and Arab sectors in the realms of planning and building was a central cause of the unrest. The commission recommended new plans for Arab localities. But according to a 2012 report by Bimkom, a planning rights organization, planning in Arab cities still lags far behind that in Jewish areas, leading to “housing crises and lack of public buildings for services.”

Poor city planning in Arab areas is at least part of the reason that some Arabs are moving out of their home communities and into Jewish towns. As Sharary said of her family’s purchase in Afula, “Arabs need it very much.”

“The story of Afula is a symptom of a much greater issue,” Steiner said. “There is a socioeconomic development pushing young Arab couples to leave Arab cities and find quality of life in adjacent neighborhoods.”

Many of the Arab buyers in Afula — such as the Shararys, who are a family of accountants — come from sturdier economic backgrounds than the Jews who are now protesting their presence in the city.
There is a counterintuitive socioeconomic aspect here,” said Rachelle Alterman, a planning expert at Israel’s Technion. “We are talking about an upwardly mobile, upper-middle income, or certainly a higher-educated Arab population in Afula, which is lower-middle income Jewish. There is this reverse disparity.”

Afula’s Jewish protesters are expressing their opposition to these new neighbors loud and clear. One anonymous activist posted a photo of Meron wrapped in a keffiyeh, the Palestinian national scarf, on Facebook. Right-wing activists mocked up similar images of Yitzhak Rabin before his murder, and also, more recently, of President Reuven Rivlin for his outreach to Arab citizens. According to a report on the Israeli website Mynet, the police are investigating the picture’s provenance.
One of the protesters, David Suissa, is chief of staff to Construction and Housing Minister Yoav Galant of the center-right Kulanu party. Issawi Frej, an Israeli-Arab member of the Knesset, called for his firing.

The Housing Ministry should campaign against racism in housing and not promote it,”he said.
The mayor’s spokesman, Moty Priel, said that the municipality is “unable to and should not intervene” in the tender process. Because the land in question is state owned, any citizen — regardless of race, religion or gender — may participate in the auction, which is held by the ILA.
An ILA spokesman told the Forward that the tender was conducted “according to the rules.”
That hasn’t placated the protesters. Adeil Eluz, manager of a gas station in Afula, said that the tender should have first been open to locals in Afula and then to people who have served in the army — a move that would exclude most Arab Israelis, who are not drafted into the army.

Image: Naomi Zeveloff   Working the Legal Front: Attorney Ilan Vaknin, who represents 10 Jewish families who lost an auction for tenders to build homes in Afula, says he and his clients ‘want to keep the Jewish character’ of the city. He is calling for an investigation into where the Arab families who won the bids got their money.
“It’s not against the Arab people,” he said. “It’s against the priority of the mayor and his councilors to give land to outside people instead of local people.”

Ilan Vaknin, an attorney representing 10 Jewish families who lost the auction, as well as other Afula residents, is less guarded in his assessment.

“We want to keep the Jewish character of the city,” he said. “And if we take in 50 [Arabs] in this little place, this will change the place from one side to the other.” Afula’s total population is 41,000 residents.

Vaknin said he suspects that some of the Arab buyers coordinated their bids, which would run afoul of the ILA process.

“Maybe an Islamist organization brought money to buy the Jewish land,” he said. “We want the police to check it.” The mayor’s office said it would look into the allegations.

Sharary believes that the protesters are driven by fear. The uproar hasn’t prompted her family to reconsider their bid. “It’s a good opportunity to make Afula another mixed town,” she said.


Contact Naomi Zeveloff at zeveloff@forward.com or on Twitter, @NaomiZeveloff

The Only Democracy in the Middle East? The Most Hateful State in the Middle East

$
0
0

Videos of Hate

Below is a selection of videos demonstrating just how democratic and peace loving Israel is the champion of racism and hate.  It is a world leader in racist hate mongering.  It is a side of Israel that the western press and politicians are keen to pretend doesn’t exist.  As I showed in my post When Nuremberg Came to Israelthis racism isn’t merely a product of individual antagonisms but is sponsored at the highest levels of the state.

When the Education Ministry of a country can ban a book portraying a love affair between an Arab girl and a Jewish boy, then it is clear that it is the state which is responsible for the racism that is manifested in the thuggery that is in evidence on the streets of Jerusalem.  The opposition of the state to intermarriage and relationships between Arabs and Jews is the most primeval, biological form of race hatred.  It was expressed in the Nuremberg laws with their concept of Rassenchande (racial pollution) and the penalties of death for sexual relationships between a Jew man and a German woman.

It is always, whether in Nazi Germany or Zionist Israel the relationship between the woman of the herrenvolk (master race) that is criminalised.  In Germany Hitler forbade charging a Jewish  woman who had sex with a German man with the offence of  Rassenchande.  The whole concept involved in this racist supremacism is one of ownership of the woman by the man.  The slogan ‘Jewish girls for the Jewish people’ expresses this idea perfectly.  The role of the Jewish woman is to service the nation by producing pure Jewish children.  Arab blood is impure and defiles and poisons the purity of the race.

Tony Greenstein 

Kach Movement - Israeli Price Tagger


Knife Dance of the Hilltop Youth

Lehava׃ The Israeli Group Keeping Jewish⁄Arab Lovers Apart


Sex with Jewish girl costs Arab man 18 months in Israeli jail

The ethnic cleansing of Africans in Israel

$
0
0

The Top 9 Israeli Government anti-Refugee Racists 2015



mobfire - the people want the Africans to be burned
Anti-African racism was peddled by both center-left Zionist Union candidate Isaac Herzog and right-wing Zionist incumbent Benjamin Netanyahu while campaigning ahead of the March election. Oren ZivActiveStills

Since 2012, the number of non-Jewish refugees from African countries in present-day Israel has shrunk from a peak of approximately 64,000 to fewer than 46,000.
Israel’s successful efforts to reduce the number of Africans living in territory it controls must be recognized for what it is: ethnic cleansing.

For the last four years, I have compiled an annual listof the public figures most responsible for Israel’s racist treatment of Africans.

The list reads as both an indictment of populist opinion-makers and a retrospective of the assaults on refugees that have taken place in the last 12 months.
9. Yisrael Katz - transport minister

In April this year, around 800 refugees drownedwhen the boat carrying them sank in the Mediterranean.
African Refugees Leaving Holot Internment Camp
In the face of this horrific tragedy, a top Israeli minister chose to revel in the government’s successful efforts to keep refugees out. Yisrael Katz, a leading figure in the right-wing Likud party who heads both ministries for transportation and intelligence and atomic energy, wrotein a Facebook post:
“Europe is having a difficult time dealing with the migrants, and with creating solutions for this difficult issue. While there are differences between us (the migrants traveling to Europe must cross a sea while those heading for Israel have a direct overland connection), you can see the rectitude of our government’s policy to build a fence on the border with Egypt, which blocks the job-seeking migrants before they enter Israel. The elections are over — you can give us some credit now.”
Racist ringleaders
The same week that Katz posted his morbid message, it emerged that among a group of African men who Islamic State militants in Libyahad executed for not being Muslims were three Eritreans who Israel had previously deportedfor not being Jews.
Infiltrators is a loaded term that was used to refer to Palestinian refugees, expelled from Palestine who tried to return.  Its use with refugees is intended to convey the message that the refugees are 'as bad as' the Arabs
Taking a cue from Katz, some Israelis responded to the news over social media with expressions of joy and calls for more of the same.

8. Ben-Dror Yemini - journalist

For years, Ben-Dror Yemini has used his regular column in Israel’s best-selling daily newspaper Yediot Ahronotto attack Africans, as well as Palestinians and progressive Israeli Jews. This August, one of his articles may have shattered all previous records for the depths to which an establishment journalist is willing to descend in support of Israel’s war on Africans.
In it, Yemini arguesthat African men should be transferred out of Israeli cities and into desert detention centers, in order to prevent romantic relationships between them and Jewish Israeli women, specifically, Black Jewish Israeli women. Yemini notes that this motive would be rejected as racist if it were stated aloud, so he advises against raising this point publicly.

Suggesting that Jews in south Tel Aviv were paying an “unbearable price” because of the Africans living among them, he claims that there are arguments for reducing the number of Africans in city centers that “cannot be presented because they are outside the rules of political correctness.”
Racist riot against refugees
7. Tie: Nissan Ben Hamo and Rafi Ben Shitrit - city mayors

In August, after Israel’s high court ordered the release of African refugees who had been held in the Holot detention center for more than a year, the government grudgingly agreed to let them go, but with a condition.

In the final days before the deadline decreed by the court, the government issueddocuments to 1,200 of those being released, declaring that they were not permitted to live or work in either Tel Aviv or the Red Sea resort of Eilat.
Eritrean refugees mourn their comrade who was killed by a lynch mob in Beersheva bus station
The decision to restrict entrance to the two cities which contain the largest African communities in Israel posed a serious challenge for the released internees. Barred from accessing their only real support system in Israel — family and friends — the refugees scrambled to find lodging for the night in smaller towns where they didn’t have close contacts.

Within hours of leaving Holot, 20 were arrested in Tel Aviv for violating the conditions of their release.

Residents in Tel Aviv protest against African refugees in August. Keren ManorActiveStills

On the morning that the first 600 were released from Holot, Nissan Ben Hamo, the mayor or Arad, wrote on Facebook that he would not permit any of these Africans to settle in that city. Ben Hamo followed up his tough talk by posting police officers at entrances to the town with instructions to stop Africans coming in.

Ben Hamo also called upon residents to “maintain alertness” and threatened to mobilize the entire town to resist the arrival of Africans, potentially with physical force. He wrote on his Facebook page: 
Holot Internment Camp
“If we have to strengthen our struggle on this issue, I won’t hesitate to call on all residents to join the fight for the city’s well-being.”

Soon, the local authority of Bisan(Beit Shean), a town in the north of present-day Israel, issued a similar declaration that it would not permit African refugees to settle there. Rafi Ben Shitrit, the mayor, urged the town’s police commander to take “immediate action to prevent illegal infiltrators from staying in Beit Shean,” insisting that they were “not only unwanted but dangerous.”

6. Moshe Yaalon - defense minister

In August, Israeli soldiers shot and wounded three citizens of African states attempting to enter Israel from Egypt. When asked about the incident, the army provided several different accounts of the event that contradicted one another.

And when Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon was asked about the incident in Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, he refused to comment.

Yaalon displayed a similar nonchalance about the shooting of an African a few months later.

In October, after a gunman opened fire at the central bus station in the southern city of Bir al-Saba(Beer Sheva), killing an Israeli soldier and wounding 11 others, an Israeli security guard shotan innocent passerby, Eritrean refugee Haftom Zarhum.

Other Israelis at the scene proceeded to kick Zarhum in the face and slam a large bench onto him as he writhed on the floor, cursing him all the while. The crowd then blocked medics who tried to evacuate him to the local hospital.

Eritreans mourn in Tel Aviv on 21 October during a memorial for Haftom Zarhum, who died after he was shot by an Israeli security guard and beaten by a mob in Bir al-Saba. Oren ZivActiveStills

The killing of Zarhum would seem to be an open and shut case of a murderous hate crime. His attackers were caught on camera assaulting him.

They were even interviewedon Israel’s Channel 2 and gleefully took credit for stomping Zarhum to death.

A week later, one of Zarhum’s attackers returnedto Channel 2 and said that he had no regrets over his role in the incident.

And yet, Yaalon’s defense ministry decidedthat Zarhum would not be recognized as a victim of terrorism because he entered Israel “illegally.” Without this status, his surviving family members are not entitled to any Israeli government compensation.

More than two months have passed since Zarhum was killed. No charges have yet been filed against the men who were responsible for his death.

5. Issac Herzog - opposition leader

Another one of the ways that Israeli society becomes increasingly racist is when centrist parties like Labor adopt right-wing rhetoric in order to chase after right-wing votes.

In recent years, Labor has not played the foil to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, but instead acceded to almost all of his hawkish proposals. Instead of standing firm against Israel’s lurch to the right, Labor has attempted to ply votes away from Likud with right-wing proposals.

That tendency has increased ever since Isaac Herzog was elected to lead the party in November 2013. It has been especially evident in Herzog’s solid support for Netanyahu’s military campaigns in Gaza and the West Bank, but also in his support for expelling Africans from Israel.

It was not always so. When the Knesset first voted to amend the country’s “anti-infiltration” law in January 2012 to sanction the roundup, detention and expulsion of African refugees, Herzog opposedthe measure.

When the Knesset voted to amend the law a second time in December 2013, Herzog didn’t show up for the vote. And by the time the Knesset voted to toughen it a third time in December 2014, he voted in favor of the amendment, along with several other Labor lawmakers.

In May 2012, Herzog wrote an opinion piece, challengingarguments by human rights groups that Eritreans in Israel deserved protection as refugees.

In March 2015, Herzog repeatedthis refrainin an attempt to peel anti-African votes away from Netanyahu on the eve of the Israeli national elections, saying, “We need to negotiate with Eritrea on the return of the Eritreans back to Eritrea.”

This year, Labor led a successful effort to abolish the Knesset’s committee on foreign workers, one of the few forums in which the concerns of refugees could receive a hearing in parliament.

In September 2015, Labor publicly complained that Netanyahu’s government has not done nearly enough to expel Africans from the country. In a public statement, Herzog’s Labor Party wholeheartedly adopted the far-right’s propaganda points, insistingwithout any basis that most refugees in Israel have no valid claim to refugee status.

“The crisis of the refugees from Syria is not similar to the issue of the infiltrators from Africa who are mostly migrant workers,” the statement read. “If only Bibi’s government had created immigration laws, it would be possible to send back to their country those who are in Israel for their welfare and for work. But the Likud government is only good at talking, and it is responsible for the troubles of the residents of south Tel Aviv.”

4. Ayelet Shaked - justice minister
During her first term as a Knesset member, from 2013 to 2015, Ayelet Shakedheadedthe parliamentary “lobby to return the infiltrators to their countries,” a group dedicated to expelling all African refugees from Israel.

In her second term, Shaked was appointed justice minister, a position she has not shied away from using to advance the lobby’s objectives.

Each time Israel’s high court has struck down amendments to the “anti-infiltration” law as a violation of the country’s basic laws, right-wing lawmakers have raged against the judicial decisions and plotted to neuter the court’s ability to void legislation.

To this end, Shaked introduceda bill in the Knesset to limit the high court’s power to overturn laws. And as judges entered the eleventh hour of deliberations over the Knesset’s third amendment to the “anti-infiltration law” this year, Shaked began to uploadvideos to the Internet which purported to show African refugees in a negative light.

Shaked expressed a desire to pressure the judges into issuing a ruling that would leave the Africans under lock and key.

Within hours, Shaked removedone of the videos she had uploaded after it was pointed out to her that the footage had been filmed in Turkey, not Israel.

Ultimately, under threat of losing some of their powers, the high court judges agreed to let the government’s third amendment stand, with the caveatthat refugees could only be detained for a year.
Disappointed that her victory was only partial, Shaked has begun to examine ways of filing criminal charges against Africans who enter Israel.

3. Gilad Erdan - public security minister

During Gilad Erdan’sbrief term as interior minister, he securedthe passage of the third amendment to the “anti-infiltration” law that enabled the incarceration of Africans in desert detention centers.
In the new Netanyahu government, Erdan heads the information, strategic affairs and public security ministries.

But before taking on his new roles, Erdan decidedthat any African who did not have a refugee status application pending must return to Africa, or be imprisoned indefinitely if they refused.

In July, an Israeli court threw out an appeal by human rights groups to quash this draconian directive.
A report by two groups working with refugees in Israel found that some of the Sudanese nationals that Israel had sent back to Sudan were being tortured by government forces upon their return.

African refugees jailed in Holot desert prison camp pray after eating a meal breaking the Ramadan fast in July. Oren ZivActiveStills

For the remainder of 2015, Erdan’s attacks on refugees consisted not of legal injunctions, but rather of racist incitement.

In April, a massive earthquake shook Nepal. This tragic event was mainly a cause for consternation in Israel because the country is a popular destination for Israeli tourists, and also a popular source of surrogate mothers to bring babies to term for gay Israeli couples.

Then serving as interior minister, Erdan responded rapidly to the quake by ordering the airlift of Israeli citizens out of the danger zone, and to also bring along a small number of local women who were in the final stages of pregnancy with Israeli fetuses.

Appearing on a popular television news show to discuss the development, Erdan emphasized that the Nepalese women’s presence in the country was “temporary.”

“We won’t convert them [to Judaism] and let them stay here,” he said.

The show’s host retorted sarcastically, “Of course, after the birth they will obviously end up in Holot,” referring to Israel’s desert detention center for African refugees.

In response, Erdan burst out in hearty laughter.

Four months later, after Erdan had already left his post at the interior ministry, he admittedthat the true purpose of the third amendment to the “anti-infiltration” law was to incarcerate Africans in order to put pressure on them to leave Israel.

As public security minister in the current government, Erdan has used news of Islamic State’s activities in Africa as a pretext to call for tightening the screws even further on refugees in Israel.

Without evidence, he has warnedthat African refugees could be Islamic State recruits, casting them as “a real security risk.” Erdan has prodded Netanyahu’s Counter-Terrorism Bureau into considering some African refugees as terrorists.

2. Silvan Shalom - interior minister

In Israel, the person with the most influence over the lives of refugees is the interior minister, responsible for deciding who is and who isn’t allowed to enter the country. For the bulk of 2015, that person was Likud legislator Silvan Shalom.

It came as no surprise when Shalom maintained the anti-African policies of his predecessors. At least as far back as 2011, Shalom publicly identified refugees as a “threat.” At that time, when citizens of African states accounted for 13 percent of the population of the southern city of Eilat, Shalom, then minister for development of the Naqab (Negev) and Galileeregions, proposedthe building of a border fence to keep Africans out of Israel.

“The fence is critical for the defense of the city of Eilat from terror cells and of course from huge waves of infiltrators flooding the city,” Shalom said.

Though Shalom’s hardline stance came as no shock, the level of anti-Black racism that emanated from his own household managed to exceed the expectations of some outside observers.

Just a month into his term as interior minister, his wife, the broadcaster Judy Shalom Nir Mozes, publicly insultedthe US president in a reductionist and racist tweet: “Do u know what Obama Coffee is? Black and weak.”

In August, Shalom decreedthat any African refugee freed from Israel’s desert detention centers by a high court order would henceforth be forbidden from living or working in either Tel Aviv or Eilat, turning those cities into “sundown towns.”

Many Israeli cities have long operated as de facto sundown towns. Palestinian citizens of Israel are harassed and run out of these cities once the sun sets, ostensibly in order to prevent romances between Jews and people of other religions.

While some of the groups who chase non-Jews out of town after dark are vigilantes who operate independently, others work in concert with the police and the municipalities.

Also in August, in an effort to undercut the refugee claims of Eritreans, who make up three quarters of the asylum-seeker population in Israel, Shalom defended the dictatorship in Eritrea. “You apparently don’t know what is happening in the country,” he responded to the accusation that Eritrea is an autocratic regime, but admitted that his belief was based on testimony by Eritrea’s own ambassador to Israel.

“Of course. Who [else] would provide the information?” he said.

Before the month ended, Shalom authorized a new rule that would put almost every non-Jewish African living in Israel at risk of being rounded up and taken to the desert detention center Holot.

Prior to the new protocol, only Eritreans and Sudanese who had already lived in Israel for many years could be summoned to Holot. Shalom’s new criteria stipulated that any Eritrean or Sudanese in Israel can be detained in Holot, regardless of the date that they entered the country.

In November, Shalom’s ministry distributed the proposed text of a fourth amendment to the “anti-infiltration” law, seeking to increase the duration that refugees can be incarcerated at Holot. In addition, the new amendment specifies that even asylum-seekers who are parents to young children can now also be forced to live at Holot.

In the last days of December 2015, Shalom resigned his post and quit the Knesset after six women came forward and accused him of serious sex crimes.

1. Benjamin Netanyahu - prime minister
Just days before national elections were held in March, Prime Benjamin Netanyahu published a videorecounting what he considered to be the greatest accomplishments of his last term in office.

Among these, he took credit for preventing the entry of African refugees or in his words, “infiltrators.”

We shut off, completely closed off access to terrorists, to infiltrators to the State of Israel,” he said.  “The only state that managed to control its borders.”

This was no idle boast. Eritreans and Sudanese make up more than 90 percent of the asylum-seekers living in Israel. And yet Israel has awarded refugee status to only four of the former and zero of the latter.

In the words of an editorialpublished by the Tel Aviv newspaper Haaretz in February, “Israel is the least moral country in the world when it comes to awarding asylum to those who deserve it.”

Once Netanyahu secured reelection, he set to the task of divvying out government ministries among party loyalists and coalition partners.

Among those appointed to serve in his new cabinet were all three Likud lawmakers who were featured speakersat a May 2012 anti-African rally in Tel Aviv that devolved into a full-on race riot: Danny Danon, Yariv Levin and Miri Regev.

For years, Netanyahu has led a team of ministers who demonize Africans in the minds of the Israeli public by associating them with terrorism and fatal diseases.

But Netanyahu knows that it isn’t appropriate for the head of the government of a self-styled Western democracy to cast all refugees as criminals.

So while he calls refugees “infiltrators” in Hebrew, his English-language statements mistranslatehis slur word as “migrants.”

For four years running, Netanyahu has led Israel’s war on refugees: promoting racists to positions of power, ensuring the passage of anti-African legislation and inciting racial hatred against a defenseless community.

Haaretz accurately summed up Netanyahu’s anti-African legacy in an editorial it published in July, under the headline, “Israel thinks African asylum-seekers aren’t human beings.

David Sheen is an independent writer and filmmaker. Born in Toronto, he now lives in Dimona in present-day Israel. Website: www.davidsheen.com. Twitter: @davidsheen

SAUDI ARABIA - CHAIRMAN OF THE UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

$
0
0
The Day Satire Died
Listening to BBC 24 coverage is couldn't believe they put on a creature by the name of Fahad Naza.  I submitted a complaint at the outrageous nature of BBC coverage which will no doubt be kicked into the long grass.

Tony Greenstein

I had the misfortune to listen to a Fahad Naza or something similar explaining the difficulties the Saudi regime faced in the wake of 47 executions.  The BBC has an appalling record in respect of prettifying the Saudi regime but putting this creature on to defend the executions was despicable, even by your standards.

If this was the Russian regime and Putin you would have adopted a completely different approach and emphasised the question of human rights.  That didn't get a look in.

This reptile even described the 47 executed as having gone through and exhausted the Saudi judicial appeal process when it is a matter of fact that there is no such process.  There are merely arbitrary decisions handed down by Saudi judges in coordination with the regime and appeals and trials held in the absence of the accused's lawyers and without any evidence being produced and subject to challenge.

Naza described the Saudi regime as being forced into having to take the action it did, because of 'terrorism' when he might have mentioned it is this very regime that has long sponsored terrorism, Isis included.  He also 'forgot' to mention the Shi'ite cleric who had been guilty of nothing more than political opposition to the vicious Saudi regime.  We know nothing about the other people murdered except that no trial in Saudi Arabia is fair.

What the BBC of course did not do, given your complicity in bolstering the Saudi regime over the years, is mention the hypocrisy of the Saudis chairing the UN Human Rights Council and the British governments hypocrisy in supporting and voting for their election to that position.  That, unlike the breaking of diplomatic relations with Iran, was not considered newsworthy.  I wonder why other than the slavish adherence to British foreign policy norms.

It is difficult to believe that the BBC can get any lower.  But then you always manage it.  Your coverage is just a grovelling echo of David Cameron's amoral approach to the Saudi barbarians.

Unprovoked Israeli Army Raid & Destruction of Equipment in the Tanweer Social Centre

$
0
0

Below is a story which speaks volumes about the nature of the Israeli occupation.  Its violence has nothing to do with ‘terrorism’ but in destroying the capacity of the Palestinians to live their lives and therefore resist.

Night raid in Tanweer Center in Nablus. Photo credit : Ziad Ameireh.
What we see is Israeli state terrorism in the wanton destruction of the property of a cultural centre.  Nablus is in Area C, which is supposed to be immune to the Israeli military but of course Israel’s terrorist army has carte blanche to invade anywhere Palestinians live.  Needless to say the role of Abbas’s PA is to protect the Israeli security state, not to protect Palestinians from that state.

Tony Greenstein

Tanweer cultural centre in Nablus raided at night, equipment stolen and damaged

On the night of the 10th of December, the Israeli forces raided the Palestinian cultural Centre Tanweer, near the old city of Nablus, and stole hardwares, wifi keys and a laptop after searching the whole centre. The organisation lost all of their data from the raid.
Night raid in Tanweer Center in Nablus. Photo credit : Ziad Ameireh.
When the volunteers arrived at 11 am the next day, they found the door broken and everything spread on the floor. Volunteers from the centre have been working on getting the place back into shape since then, but much of the furniture and computer equipment have been severely damaged. The Rachel Corrie computer room, established in 2011, was as well raided and the computers are at the moment unusable. The team is thinking of launching a fundraising campaign to help replace the lost equipment.
Night raid in Tanweer Center in Nablus. Photo credit : Ziad Ameireh.
The volunteers’ coordinator has been arrested around three weeks ago during a night raid, as well as about seven of the organisation’s volunteers. Tanweer is not involved in any political activism; it’s a cultural center working to educate the youth from the old city of Nablus and therefore the volunteers don’t understand the reason for this targeting of their work.
Night raid in Tanweer Center in Nablus. Photo credit : Ziad Ameireh.
The coordinators, along with Palestinian volunteers, organise activities, support classes, computer courses and any cultural events. “You attack a cultural center, it means that you don’t want people to be enlightened”, said Mustafa Azizi, one of the volunteers.
Night raid in Tanweer Center in Nablus. Photo credit : Ziad Ameireh.
TANWEER PRESS RELEASE

The civil society association ‘Tanweer, Palestinian Cultural Enlightenment Forum’ in Nablus, West Bank, occupied Palestine was raided by the Apartheid Israel occupation, (AIO) military forces on the 9th of December 2015. The AIO military’s targets were a public access computer facility named the ‘Rachel Corrie Room’ in memorial, established in 2011, in addition to the written courses for educating youth and the furnishings of Tanweer.  

During the AIO military operation at Tanweer - besides turning everything inside-out - the internal hard drives of all nine computers were confiscated, together with the WiFi keys, a laptop, a 1Tb USB key, as well as a server computer.
Night raid in Tanweer Center in Nablus. Photo credit : Ziad Ameireh.
It is noteworthy that the policy of AIO towards this Palestinian civil association is seeking to tighten the noose on their activity by raiding them and arresting their board members, so as to prevent cultural development for the minds of Palestinian youth. For Tanweer, the AIO military forces arrested 3 of its board members during the last 3 years, the most recent being Wael Faqeh, the coordinator of voluntary work, including the international solidarity friends in Tanweer, who was detained October 25that the AIO military check-point near Ramallah, while travelling for a workshop. His tribunal hearing is to take place December 30th by military tribunal, as Palestinians are still under AIO military laws despite the Oslo accord and its Palestinian authority.
Night raid in Tanweer Center in Nablus. Photo credit : Ziad Ameireh.
The Tanweer Internet radio program ‘Enlightened Voice For A Free Palestine’, which was initiated in cooperation with  Italian radio ‘Nurvo Resistance Radio’, on September 1, 2015 was able to reach a half million listeners in Italy, Spain, the USA and France. Its purpose is to educate the world about the reality of the occupation in Nablus and is likely the foremost reason why the military raid took place.
Night raid in Tanweer Center in Nablus. Photo credit : Ziad Ameireh.
As a result, this notice is being launched to rebuild the Rachel Corrie computer room by an appeal for funds to the Tanweer Forum. The nine hard drives, WiFi keys and laptop will amount to 5,500 NIS ($3,000 USD).

Additional funding would set up a new server to host the Tanweer website, as well as generate revenue by hosting web site services.
Night raid in Tanweer Center in Nablus. Photo credit : Ziad Ameireh.
Donations may be deposited with the Montréal, Canada Caisse Desjardins account here following.       

Account for donations :         Account # 815-92166-006957-5
Caisse Desjardins Portugaise – Siège social
4244, boulevard St-Laurent,
Montréal (Québec), H2W 1Z3
514 842-8077

- Languages spoken :français, English, Spanish, portugais

Please don't hesitate to contact us for any additional information through the following email:


see also Tanweer's Facebook Page 
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1059798097385522&id=232780910087249&fref=nf 

Zionists Threaten Bethany Koval US High School Student for Posting Support for Palestinians

$
0
0
Whenever I think that the Zionists have just about sunk as low as they can get, they surprise me and dredge the sewer even deeper!  Bethany Koval, a 16 year old teen in New Jersey was called in to the Principal’s office to see Fair Lawn High School’s Assistant Principal, Frank Guadagnino.

Guadagnino then intimidated her into signing a statement, threatening legal and other action against her, unless she stopped tweeting her criticism of Israel’s murderous actions in Gaza.

It seems that not satisfied with trying to suppress free speech on university campuses the Zionists and their willing dupes are now trying to do the same in high schools too.  Soon they will asking to vet the use reading material in nurseries and kindergartens.

It’s not for nothing that the USA is known as  the land of the free!

The school’s defence is here

Tony Greenstein

New Jersey teenager threatened with legal action by high school over pro-Palestine activism

Annie Robbins on January 7, 2016

Screenshot: @bendykoval

Bethany Koval, a remarkably brazen and aware 16 year old teenage activist from Fair Lawn, New Jersey studying at Fair Lawn High School was targeted for her political activism yesterday. What began over Koval’s commentary of the Gaza beach bombing: “I spoke of the death tolls and called Israel’s govt a terrorist“, resulted in her being called down to the principle’s office, intimidated, threatened with legal action, and coerced into signing a statement.
Fairlawn's pathetic defence
As Koval tweeted her experience all day throughout the process, activists on social media swiftly rallied in support and started a hashtag,  #IStandwithBenny. News of her harassment spread like wildfire nationally and internationally. It’s already gone viral.

Principal just called me down. I'm about to be exposed for being anti-Israel. Pray for me.
— benny (@bendykoval) January 6, 2016

“I have a right to speak” begins Koval’s coerced written statement, photographed (below), and tweeted out to the world. “Mr. Guaginino intimidated me into writing this without an attorney”, referencing Fair Lawn High School Assistant Principal, Frank Guadagnino.

She’s smart and defiant. “I expressed my political opinions online recording the Israeli government, and I will continue to do so. I will not be silenced by fear. I will not be intimidated into submission.”

Eleven days before on December 27, Bethany Koval started an extended information thread on her twitter feed consisting of numerous tweets explaining in simple clear terms why Israel is an apartheid state. She began somewhat benignly, like this:
Israel is an apartheid state. Here's why, in simple terms: coming from an Israeli Jew.
[THREAD]
— benny (@bendykoval) December 27, 2015

No slouch, Bethany’s opening tweets responsibly quoted Oxford Dictionaries:
 “Apartheid” can be defined as segregation on grounds other than race. Some say this term doesn’t apply to Israel due to fair voting rights. But “segregation” can be defined as “the enforced separation of different racial groups in a country, community, or establishment”.

Then she linked to the Times of Israel‘s Ex-Shin Bet chief calls for West Bank road segregation, articles in Haaretz, as well as the horrendous and now infamous settler wedding knife dance video exposing the stabbing of Ali Dawabshe’s image, the 18-month old Palestinian baby burned alive on July 31. The entire extended thread is available hereand Muftah republished many of the tweets in How a New Jersey Teenager Was Railroaded by Her School for Being Pro-Palestine.

Here is the full statement she was coerced into writing after clearly stating “I don’t want to make a statement” and stressing I believe I have a right to an attorney.

I was denied my right to an attorney. I was forced to make a writer statement, but I begged them to revoke it. pic.twitter.com/izgyLANgMJ

— benny (@bendykoval) January 6, 2016

Here he intimidates me into making a statement without legal presence. pic.twitter.com/P9q6zzRPcV
— benny (@bendykoval) January 6, 2016

During her holiday break on December 22, Koval was engaged in a conversation about Palestine/Israel and the viability of a 2 state solution, the discussion turned to Hamas. Koval tweeted she didn’t think Hamas was extreme; “Hamas is just painted that way Hateful rhetoric against Hamas is what allowed the Gaza bombing”. Another student at her school took offense to her tweets and began discussing them with friends. It occurred to Koval she could get in trouble and that her opinions could be construed as “hate speech“.

She explained in her statement to the authorities “A girl…told her friends I had no right to speak on this, and erased my Jewish ethnicity”.  Unfortunately challenging the ethnicity of Jews who expose Israel’s atrocities is not uncommon. Koval wrote she retaliated by writing a tweet about it, a “general message”. Hence, students reported her and she was accused of being a bully, a charge that is punishable by suspension and/or expulsion (pdf) in the state of New Jersey.

“Why I am accused of “bullying”, I think because I wish for a Free Palestine. The freedom of speech is chained and beaten in this school.”

Renowned scholar Steven Salaita tweeted out “Zionists are now going after teenagers. No surprise.” News of her predicament was translated into Arabic and spread fast through social media:
Screenshot

Activist from all over the world inundated the school and the district communicating their displeasure, resulting in Koval requesting all communication to the school stop.
Although support has been pouring in from all over the world. Benny tweeted her parents didn’t support her views.

Both of my parents disagree with me

— benny (@bendykoval) January 6, 2016

After reading an alarming tweet that her parents were “REALLY mad” and concerned about her situation at home, I spoke with Bethany Koval. She’s now retained New York attorney Stanley Cohen and evidently Cohen has put her nervous mom at ease, “He spoke with her and she really calmed down”.

It’s a lot to handle having your child the focus of so much attention over such a heated controversy, but her mom’s warming to the situation, somewhat.

I asked Bethany if she was prepared for celebrity.

“No, not really. I don’t want to be the face of the movement, I want Palestinians to be the face of the movement. It’s not right when privileged people get credit for what under privileged people have been saying for a long time.”

Have you been contacted by any mainstream publications?

“The New York Times”

Do you feel like you are raising the consciousness around you, at school perhaps?

“It’s going to be odd to go back, I see the divide between friend groups. Some students in my school have contacted me and let me know they’re listening, letting me know they are supportive. I didn’t expect, I didn’t see this coming.”

Meanwhile, online she’s swiftly becoming a role model for free speech pro Palestinian youth activists. Smart, moral, politically savvy, conscious, and classy too:

When Zionists expect me to be in favor of the Palestinian genocide because I'm an Israeli Jew pic.twitter.com/ixgCfE3Rua
— benny (@bendykoval) January 6, 2016

Israel and Saudi Arabia - The Roots of a Special Relationship

$
0
0
This is an important and well-researched article.  It shows beyond doubt how the Saudi regime, which ousted its rivals in Arabia in the period 1921-1925, worked closely with British imperialism.  Ibn Saud was unleashed as a weapon of the British against those Arab rulers who refused to accept the Zionist colonisation of Palestine.  In other words, the corrupt Ibn Saud clan were quislings and traitors from the start.  Their barbarous and medieval practices, which involved stoning, flogging and mass executions, were justified by the Wahhabi faith in the same way that religion justifies repression in many countries.  Just as today Phillip Hammond justifies the 47 executions by the Saudis as the inevitable consequence of Sharia Law, thus demonstrating his own ignorance as well as the priorities and concerns of present day British imperialism.

 Tony Greenstein
Abdel Aziz Ibn Saud with Sir Percy Cox
Israel and Saudi Arabia have worked for years together.  Another example is in Lebanon where the Saudis supported the Phalangists against the leftist Lebanese National Movement.  In this they also worked with the Israelis.  The instance of co-operation with Israel in Yemen in the 1950’s when Nasser supported the Republicans is well known.

Today Israel and Saudi Arabia work hand in glove in opposing Iran and supporting the ‘moderate’ terrorists in Syria.

Tony Greenstein


Churchill and Ibn Saud in Egypt 1945
The covert alliance between the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the Zionist entity of Israel should be no surprise to any student of British imperialism. The problem is the study of British imperialism has very few students. Indeed, one can peruse any undergraduate or post-graduate British university prospectus and rarely find a module in a Politics degree on the British Empire let alone a dedicated degree or Masters degree. Of course if the European led imperialist carnage in the four years between 1914 – 1918 tickles your cerebral cells then it’s not too difficult to find an appropriate institution to teach this subject, but if you would like to delve into how and why the British Empire waged war on mankind for almost four hundred years you’re practically on your own in this endeavour. One must admit, that from the British establishment’s perspective, this is a formidable and remarkable achievement.
Ibn Saud
In late 2014, according to the American journal, “Foreign Affairs”, the Saudi petroleum Minister, Ali al-Naimi is reported to have said “His Majesty King Abdullah has always been a model for good relations between Saudi Arabia and other states and the Jewish state is no exception.” Recently, Abdullah’s successor, King Salman expressed similar concerns to those of Israel’s to the growing agreement between the United States and Iran over the latter’s nuclear programme. This led some to report that Israel and KSA presented a “united front” in their opposition to the nuclear deal. This was not the first time the Zionists and Saudis have found themselves in the same corner in dealing with a perceived common foe. In North Yemen in the 1960’s, the Saudis were financing a British imperialist led mercenary army campaign against revolutionary republicans who had assumed authority after overthrowing the authoritarian, Imam. Gamal Abdul-Nasser’s Egypt militarily backed the republicans, while the British induced the Saudis to finance and arm the remaining remnants of the Imam’s supporters. Furthermore, the British organised the Israelis to drop arms for the British proxies in North Yemen, 14 times. The British, in effect, militarily but covertly, brought the Zionists and Saudis together in 1960’s North Yemen against their common foe.

However, one must go back to the 1920’s to fully appreciate the origins of this informal and indirect alliance between Saudi Arabia and the Zionist entity. The defeat of the Ottoman Empire by British imperialism in World War One, left three distinct authorities in the Arabian peninsula: Sharif of Hijaz: Hussain bin Ali of Hijaz (in the west), Ibn Rashid of Ha’il (in the north) and Emir Ibn Saud of Najd (in the east) and his religiously fanatical followers, the Wahhabis.
Fahd bin Abdul Aziz Al Saud & fellow tyrant
Ibn Saud had entered the war early in January 1915 on the side of the British, but was quickly defeated and his British handler, William Shakespear was killed by the Ottoman Empire’s ally Ibn Rashid. This defeat greatly hampered Ibn Saud’s utility to the Empire and left him militarily hamstrung for a year.[1] The Sharif contributed the most to the Ottoman Empire’s defeat by switching allegiances and leading the so-called ‘Arab Revolt’ in June 1916 which removed the Turkish presence from Arabia. He was convinced to totally alter his position because the British had strongly led him to believe, via correspondence with Henry McMahon, the British High Commissioner in Egypt, that a unified Arab country from Gaza to the Persian Gulf will be established with the defeat of the Turks. The letters exchanged between Sharif Hussain and Henry McMahon are known as the McMahon-Hussain Correspondence.
The Saud clan circa 1911
Understandably, the Sharif as soon as the war ended wanted to hold the British to their war time promises, or what he perceived to be their war time promises, as expressed in the aforementioned correspondence. The British, on the other hand, wanted the Sharif to accept the Empire’s new reality which was a division of the Arab world between them and the French (Sykes-Picot agreement) and the implementation of the Balfour Declaration, which guaranteed ‘a national home for the Jewish people’ in Palestine by colonisation with European Jews. This new reality was contained in the British written, Anglo-Hijaz Treaty, which the Sharif was profoundly averse to signing.[2] After all, the revolt of 1916 against the Turks was dubbed the ‘Arab Revolt’ not the ‘Hijazi Revolt’.
Ibn Saud with President Roosevelt
Actually, the Sharif let it be known that he will never sell out Palestine to the Empire’s Balfour Declaration; he will never acquiescence to the establishment of Zionism in Palestine or accept the new random borders drawn across Arabia by British and French imperialists. For their part the British began referring to him as an ‘obstructionist’, a ‘nuisance’ and of having a ‘recalcitrant’ attitude.
The British let it be known to the Sharif that they were prepared to take drastic measures to bring about his approval of the new reality regardless of the service that he had rendered them during the War. After the Cairo Conference in March 1921, where the new Colonial Secretary Winston Churchill met with all the British operatives in the Middle East, T.E. Lawrence (i.e. of Arabia) was dispatched to meet the Sharif to bribe and bully him to accept Britain’s Zionist colonial project in Palestine. Initially, Lawrence and the Empire offered 80,000 rupees.[3] The Sharif rejected it outright. Lawrence then offered him an annual payment of £100,000.[4] The Sharif refused to compromise and sell Palestine to British Zionism.
TE Lawrence of Arabia - who helped implement a Zionist agenda with the Arab revolt
When financial bribery failed to persuade the Sharif, Lawrence threatened him with an Ibn Saud takeover. Lawrence claimed that “politically and militarily, the survival of Hijaz as a viable independent Hashemite kingdom was wholly dependent on the political will of Britain, who had the means to protect and maintain his rule in the region.” [5] In between negotiating with the Sharif, Lawrence made the time to visit other leaders in the Arabian peninsula and informed them that they if they don’t tow the British line and avoid entering into an alliance with the Sharif, the Empire will unleash Ibn Saud and his Wahhabis who after all is at Britain’s ‘beck and call’.[6]

Simultaneously, after the Conference, Churchill travelled to Jerusalem and met with the Sharif’s son, Abdullah, who had been made the ruler, “Emir”, of a new territory called “Transjordan.” Churchill informed Abdullah that he should persuade “his father to accept the Palestine mandate and sign a treaty to such effect,” if not “the British would unleash Ibn Saud against Hijaz.”[7] In the meantime the British were planning to unleash Ibn Saud on the ruler of Ha’il, Ibn Rashid.

Ibn Rashid had rejected all overtures from the British Empire made to him via Ibn Saud, to be another of its puppets.[8] More so, Ibn Rashid expanded his territory north to the new mandated Palestinian border as well as to the borders of Iraq in the summer of 1920. The British became concerned that an alliance maybe brewing between Ibn Rashid who controlled the northern part of the peninsula and the Sharif who controlled the western part. More so, the Empire wanted the land routes between the Palestinian ports on the Mediterranean Sea and the Persian Gulf under the rule of a friendly party. At the Cairo Conference, Churchill agreed with an imperial officer, Sir Percy Cox that “Ibn Saud should be ‘given the opportunity to occupy Hail.’”[9] By the end of 1920, the British were showering Ibn Saud with “a monthly ‘grant’ of £10,000 in gold, on top of his monthly subsidy. He also received abundant arms supplies, totalling more than 10,000 rifles, in addition to the critical siege and four field guns” with British-Indian instructors.[10] Finally, in September 1921, the British unleashed Ibn Saud on Ha’il which officially surrendered in November 1921. It was after this victory the British bestowed a new title on Ibn Saud. He was no longer to be “Emir of Najd and Chief of its Tribes” but “Sultan of Najd and its Dependencies”. Ha’il had dissolved into a dependency of the Empire’s Sultan of Najd.

If the Empire thought that the Sharif, with Ibn Saud now on his border and armed to the teeth by the British, would finally become more amenable to the division of Arabia and the British Zionist colonial project in Palestine they were short lived. A new round of talks between Abdulla’s son, acting on behalf of his father in Transjordan and the Empire resulted in a draft treaty accepting Zionism. When it was delivered to the Sharif with an accompanying letter from his son requesting that he “accept reality”, he didn’t even bother to read the treaty and instead composed a draft treaty himself rejecting the new divisions of Arabia as well as the Balfour Declaration and sent it to London to be ratified![11]

Ever since 1919 the British had gradually decreased Hussain’s subsidy to the extent that by the early 1920’s they had suspended it, while at the same time continued subsidising Ibn Saud right through the early 1920’s.[12] After a further three rounds of negotiations in Amman and London, it dawned on the Empire that Hussain will never relinquish Palestine to Great Britain’s Zionist project or accept the new divisions in Arab lands.[13]In March 1923, the British informed Ibn Saud that it will cease his subsidy but not without awarding him an advance ‘grant’ of £50,000 upfront, which amounted to a year’s subsidy.[14]

In March 1924, a year after the British awarded the ‘grant’ to Ibn Saud, the Empire announced that it had terminated all discussions with Sharif Hussain to reach an agreement.[15] Within weeks the forces of Ibn Saud and his Wahhabi followers began to administer what the British foreign secretary, Lord Curzon called the “final kick” to Sharif Hussain and attacked Hijazi territory.[16] By September 1924, Ibn Saud had overrun the summer capital of Sharif Hussain, Ta’if. The Empire then wrote to Sharif’s sons, who had been awarded kingdoms in Iraq and Transjordan not to provide any assistance to their besieged father or in diplomatic terms they were informed “to give no countenance to interference in the Hedjaz”.[17] In Ta’if, Ibn Saud’s Wahhabis committed their customary massacres, slaughtering women and children as well as going into mosques and killing traditional Islamic scholars.[18] They captured the holiest place in Islam, Mecca, in mid-October 1924. Sharif Hussain was forced to abdicate and went to exile to the Hijazi port of Akaba. He was replaced as monarch by his son Ali who made Jeddah his governmental base. As Ibn Saud moved to lay siege to the rest of Hijaz, the British found the time to begin incorporating the northern Hijazi port of Akaba into Transjordan. Fearing that Sharif Hussain may use Akaba as a base to rally Arabs against the Empire’s Ibn Saud, the Empire let it be known that in no uncertain terms that he must leave Akaba or Ibn Saud will attack the port. For his part, Sharif Hussain responded that he had,

“never acknowledged the mandates on Arab countries and still protest against the British Government which has made Palestine a national home for the Jews.”[19]

Sharif Hussain was forced out of Akaba, a port he had liberated from the Ottoman Empire during the ‘Arab Revolt’, on the 18th June 1925 on HMS Cornflower.

Ibn Saud had begun his siege of Jeddah in January 1925 and the city finally surrendered in December 1925 bringing to an end over 1000 years of rule by the Prophet Muhammad’s descendants. The British officially recognised Ibn Saud as the new King of Hijaz in February 1926 with other European powers following suit within weeks. The new unified Wahhabi state was rebranded by the Empire in 1932 as the “Kingdom of Saudi Arabia” (KSA). A certain George Rendel, an officer working at the Middle East desk at the Foreign Office in London, claimed credit for the new name.
On the propaganda level, the British served the Wahhabi takeover of Hijaz on three fronts. Firstly, they portrayed and argued that Ibn Saud’s invasion of Hijaz was motivated by religious fanaticism rather than by British imperialism’s geo-political considerations.[20] This deception is propounded to this day, most recently in Adam Curtis’s acclaimed BBC “Bitter Lake” documentary, whereby he states that the “fierce intolerant vision of wahhabism” drove the “Bedouins” to create Saudi Arabia.[21] Secondly, the British portrayed Ibn Saud’s Wahhabi fanatics as a benign and misunderstood force who only wanted to bring Islam back to its purest form.[22] To this day, these Islamist jihadis are portrayed in the most benign manner when their armed insurrections is supported by Britain and the West such as 1980’s Afghanistan or in today’s Syria, where they are referred to in the western media as “moderate rebels.” Thirdly, British historians portray Ibn Saud as an independent force and not as a British instrument used to horn away anyone perceived to be surplus to imperial requirements. For example, Professor Eugene Rogan’s recent study on the history on Arabs claims that “Ibn Saud had no interest in fighting” the Ottoman Empire. This is far from accurate as Ibn Saud joined the war in 1915. He further disingenuously claims that Ibn Saud was only interested in advancing “his own objectives” which fortuitously always dovetailed with those of the British Empire.[23]

In conclusion, one of the most overlooked aspects of the Balfour Declaration is the British Empire’s commitment to “use their best endeavours to facilitate” the creation of “a national home for the Jewish people”. Obviously, many nations in the world today were created by the Empire but what makes Saudi Arabia’s borders distinctive is that its northern and north-eastern borders are the product of the Empire facilitating the creation of Israel. At the very least the dissolution of the two Arab sheikhdoms of Ha’il and Hijaz by Ibn Saud’s Wahhabis is based in their leaders’ rejection to facilitate the British Empire’s Zionist project in Palestine.

Therefore, it is very clear that the British Empire’s drive to impose Zionism in Palestine is embedded in the geographical DNA of contemporary Saudi Arabia. There is further irony in the fact that the two holiest sites in Islam are today governed by the Saudi clan and Wahhabi teachings because the Empire was laying the foundations for Zionism in Palestine in the 1920s. Contemporaneously, it is no surprise that both Israeland Saudi Arabia are keen in militarily intervening on the side of “moderate rebels” i.e. jihadis, in the current war on Syria, a country which covertly and overtly rejects the Zionist colonisation of Palestine.

As the United States, the ‘successor’ to the British Empire in defending western interests in the Middle East, is perceived to be growing more hesitant in engaging militarily in the Middle East, there is an inevitability that the two nations rooted in the Empire’s Balfour Declaration, Israel and Saudi Arabia, would develop a more overt alliance to defend their common interests.

Notes
[1] Gary Troeller, “The Birth of Saudi Arabia” (London: Frank Cass, 1976) pg.91.
[2] Askar H. al-Enazy, “ The Creation of Saudi Arabia: Ibn Saud and British Imperial Policy, 1914-1927” (London: Routledge, 2010), pg. 105-106.
[3] ibid., pg. 109.
[4] ibid., pg.111.
[5] ibid.
[6] ibid.
[7] ibid., pg 107.
[8] ibid., pg. 45-46 and pg.101-102.
[9] ibid., pg.104.
[10] ibid.
[11] ibid., pg. 113.
[12] ibid., pg.110 and Troeller, op. cit., pg.166.
[13] al-Enazy op cit., pg.112-125.
[14] al-Enazy, op. cit., pg.120.
[15] ibid., pg.129.
[16] ibid., pg. 106 and Troeller op. cit., 152.
[17] al-Enazy, op. cit., pg. 136 and Troeller op. cit., pg.219.
[18] David Howarth, “The Desert King: The Life of Ibn Saud” (London: Quartet Books, 1980), pg. 133 and Randall Baker, “King Husain and the Kingdom of Hejaz” (Cambridge: The Oleander Press, 1979), pg.201-202.
[19] Quoted in al-Enazy op. cit., pg. 144.
[20] ibid., pg. 138 and Troeller op. cit., pg. 216.
[21]In the original full length BBC iPlayer version this segment begins towards the end at 2 hrs 12 minutes 24 seconds.
[22] al-Enazy op. cit., pg. 153.
[23] Eugene Rogan, “The Arabs: A History”, (London: Penguin Books, 2009), pg.220.


Arabs and Jews protest ‘book ban’ with a kiss

$
0
0

Video of Palestinians and Jews Kissing in Defiance of Ban on Borderlife in Schools
Borderlife - The book that Israel's Education Ministry banned
As I recently blogged in When Nuremberg came to Israel Israel’s Ministry of Education, under arch-racist Naftali Bennett, banned a book, Borderlife by Dorit Rabinyan,  about a romance between Jewish and Arab teenagers.  Because Israel is a state founded on the same principles of Nazi Germany, as epitomised in the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 which banned sexual relations between Jews and ‘Aryans’, it was felt necessary by  the Education Ministry to ban a book which might be seen to endorse romantic relationships across racial borders.  Over half of Israel’s Jewish population see intermarriage and sexual relations between Jews and Arabs as ‘national treason’.  Note that they see it in terms of loyalty to the state not as something that is religiously forbidden.
Dorit Rabinyan

Of course the publicity this has gathered is embarrassing to the Israeli state.  How do you explain in normal Western society that something that is taken for granted here is forbidden on racial grounds in Israel?  Imagine  banning a book depicting a romance between Black and White teenagers in Britain.  Only the British National Party and National Front would object.  But to those who have some knowledge of Israel, it is a well known fact that in Israel you can’t have a marriage between a Jew and an Arab, because there is  no civil marriage.  Civil marriage, which is the norm in all western society, is forbidden in Israel precisely in order to protect the Jewish gene pool.  When decisions like this are made then the nature of Israel as a racist state is revealed to the whole world, hence why it is reported that Arabs and Jews protest ‘book ban’ with a kiss that the decision is being looked at by the Attorney General.
The forbidden kiss

However a group of people have got together to make a video of kissing across racial lines.  No doubt Goebbels would have disapproved almost as strongly as Netanyahu.

The West's Evangelical Christians Turn a Blind Eye to Attacks on Palestinian Christians

$
0
0
Christian Cemetery Vandalised and Crosses Destroyed at Latin Patriarchate in Jerusalem
Vandalism and destruction of crosses and gravestones in Christian cemetery in Beit Shemesh
'Jesus is a monkey'is daubed in Hebrew graffitti on the Church of Multiplication of Loaves
 
 Many of the most ardent Zionists, the religious settlers in particular, are vehemently anti-Christian.  There’s none of this Judeo-Christian heritage for them.  Admittedly the idea of a Judeo-Christian tradition is a myth which resulted from Israel’s strategic need to cultivate Europe and secure reparations and arms supplies. 
Benzi Gopstein - fuhrer of the state-funded neo-Nazi Lehava group which advocates burning down churches and mosques
The latest act of vandalism is quite likely to have been caused by the anti-miscegenation neo-Nazi group, Lehava, half of whose funds come from the Israeli government via its ‘charitable’ wing Hemla.  [Hemla looks after ‘fallen’ Jewish girls who have had the misfortune to have had relationships with Arab men, thus polluting the Jewish gene pool]
As the Telegraph’s Robert Tait reported  (6.8.15.)
“The leader of a far-Right Israeli group has risked arrest by apparently voicing support for arson attacks on Christian churches amid an official crackdown on Jewish extremism.
Christian Zionists just love the idea of Jews perishing in the flames of Armageddon, as per Revelations, in order to enable The Rapture
"Benzi Gopstein, the outspoken head of Lehava - which has drawn notoriety for its violent assaults on Jewish-Arab assimilation - made the remarks at a panel discussion for Jewish yeshiva students when asked by a fellow panelist if he believed burning down churches in Israel was justified.”
Arab Christians in Israel demonstrating against the decision of the Education Ministry to cut the funding of Christian schools to 29% (many Muslims go to them too) Jewish Orthodox schools receive 100% state funding
Tait went on to report that:

“However, Shin Bet - Israel's domestic intelligence agency - recently concluded that there are no legal grounds for similarly outlawing Lehava, despite a request from Mr Ya'alon to consider doing so.”  
Ya’alon is Israel’s Defence (War) Minister.  Israel’s Northern Islamic League, which engages in such terrorist activities as providing grants for Arabs living in poverty, food kitchens, running kindergartens etc. has been outlawed  in a blatant example of Israel's prevailing Islamaphobia.  It has never been engaged in ‘terrorist’ activity, but has organised demonstrations and campaigns against Zionist attacks on the Gold Dome mosque in Jerusalem.  But the Northern Islamic League is Arab not Jewish therefore it is, according to Zionist logic right to ban it whereas an organisation whose leader advocates the burning of Churches and Mosques is allowed to operate freely.
Arson at a West Bank mosque
If a Palestinian had made these remarks, about how burning down synagogues was desirable, his feet would not have touched the floor.  He would have been put in detention and would be facing a minimum of three years in prison or administrative detention.  However Gopstein is Jewish not Arab, so he has not been arrested, despite the conviction of 2 of his supporters for arson at the mixed Jewish school ‘Hand in  Hand’ in Jerusalem.  Because they were Jewish they got 2 and 2½ years in prison (Arabs would have got at least 10 years inside because they would have been classed as ‘terrorists’). 
Gopstein with Lehava thugs on the lookout in Jerusalem for Arab men in 'Jewish' areas - they campaign to stop Jewish and non-Jewish relationships
The decision not to arrest Gopstein is however understandable from a Zionist perspective.  When Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur wrote a book ‘Torat HaMelechwhich was a guide book on how, in accordance with Jewish law, one might kill Gentiles (non-Jews) legally, there were also calls for their arrest.  Indeed they were, briefly arrested, but no charges were ever brought.  Why?  Because in Israel although racism is an offence, there is an exclusion clause.  Racism and incitement to racial hatred on religious grounds is not an offence.  This exclusion clause was absolutely necessary because Israel is a Jewish state which, by definition, discriminates against non-Jews on religious national grounds.  Hence why the neo-Nazi Jewish MK, Rabbi Meir Kahane (who was later debarred from running for the Knesset) voted for the law!

In a reportThe King's Torah: A Rabbinic Text or a Call to Terror? in Israel's sole liberal paper, Ha’aretz (22.1.10)  it is reported that Torat HaMelech (the King’s Torah)
Destruction of Mosque
“looks like any other religious commentary you'd find in an Orthodox Judaica bookstore - but reads like a rabbinic instruction manual outlining acceptable scenarios for killing non-Jewish babies, children and adults.” 

According to Daniel Estrin, Torat HaMelech states, quite correctly from my own knowledge of the Talmud and Jewish law that

“The prohibition 'Thou Shalt Not Murder' applies only "to a Jew who kills a Jew," write Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur of the West Bank settlement of Yitzhar. Non-Jews are "uncompassionate by nature" and attacks on them "curb their evil inclination," while babies and children of Israel's enemies may be killed since "it is clear that they will grow to harm us."
Arson at the Church of Multiplication of Loaves on the Sea of Galilee
But there are some fools and idiots who nonetheless claim that Zionism is not racist.  Indeed they go further and claim, like Graham Cox, the Evangelical Christian and Tory candidate in Hove at the General Election, that Israel is

“a beacon of freedom in the Middle East and the only place where every lifestyle and belief system – from gays to Christians and Muslims and other faiths; in fact, all social and religious minorities – are protected,” 

Indeed Cox went on to say, at a General Election meeting hosted by the far-right Sussex Friends of Israel that:


“As a member of the Church of England I’m constantly impressed that Israel is the only country in the region where number of Christians is rising and their lives are thriving.”

Their lives are certainly thriving.  So much so that, according to the Jerusalem Post, the employment rate for Christians stands at 54% – 63.8% for men and 45.3% for women. For Arab Christians it is even worse - the rates are 48% – with men at 59.5% and women at 37.7%, compared with a national average of 75% and 66% respectively. 

Graham Cox is an evangelical Christian.  For Evangelical Christians, Palestinian Christians are invisible.  Their creed is the idea of the 'Jewish return' to Palestine/Israel.  The motive for such a belief, which originated with people like George Elliot (Daniel Deronda) and Lords Palmerstone, Shaftesbury and Balfour was thoroughly anti-Semitic.  They didn't want Jews in this country but were more than happy for them to be part of Britain's colonisation of the Middle East.

Tony Greenstein

Destruction of Crosses at Latin Patriarchate in Jerusalem
Vandals have destroyed dozens of crosses at a Christian cemetery west of Jerusalem, the Latin Patriarchate in the city said Saturday, urging Israeli authorities to bring the culprits to justice.

The church did not say who was behind the desecration but in recent years there have been a spate of hate crimes known as “price tag” attacks targeting churches and Christian cemeteries, with the perpetrators believed to be Jewish extremists.

The attacks, that have escalated in the wake of the break down of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks last year, intend to exact a price for Israeli government policies seen as detrimental to the settlement enterprise. Such attacks have long been a problem in the West Bank. But suspected Jewish extremists increasingly are targeting Israeli Arab citizens, mosques and churches within the country’s borders.

“Salesian fathers responsible for the monastery in Beit Jamal reported that unknown persons desecrated their monastery’s cemetery,” the patriarchate said in a statement.

“The fathers reported also that tens of crosses were destroyed at their cemetery,” it said, condemning the attack which apparently took place in December.

The Beit Jamal monastery, next to the town of Beit Shemesh, is known for its good relations with Israelis who visit to buy its ceramics.

Vandals had desecrated the cemetery of the Catholic monastery of Beit Jamal, which is run by the Salesian order, in September 1981, said the statement.

The patriarchate urged “the police… and the Israeli authorities in general to invest every possible effort” to bring to justice those responsible for this and past desecrations.

“We do hope that more efforts be made to educate all inhabitants of the country to respect each other despite their different religious backgrounds,” said the English language statement.

In April, vandals smashed gravestones at a Maronite Christian cemetery in a village near Israel’s northern border with Lebanon.

In June, arsonists attacked the Church of the Multiplication in Tabgha, on the shores of the Sea of Galilee where many Christians believe Jesus fed 5,000 people in the miracle of the five loaves and two fish.

One building within the compound was totally destroyed in the blaze but the church itself was not damaged.

Hebrew graffiti was scrawled on another building that read “idols will be cast out” or destroyed — part of a common Jewish prayer.

Two suspected Jewish extremists were charged in connection with the arson and graffiti, and Israel said it would compensate church officials for the damage.
JTA contributed to this report.


Christ at the Checkpoint Conference - Christian Zionists Tell Jesus to Cut the Criticism of the Money Lenders! 





Viewing all 2413 articles
Browse latest View live